Article Comments - 2009 Subaru Forester XT First Drive and Full Test

71 messages, Last post on Aug 26, 2009 at 11:14 AM

You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Wagon, SUV

First Drive: 2009 Subaru Forester XT - First Impressions: The style factor is up, but so is the practicality.(more)

Full Test: 2009 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Limited - Bottom Line: Bigger and better, the quirky little Forester has become a grown-up SUV. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 6 of 8: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; Prev; Next; Last

#48 of 71 whatever works for the buyer by kurtamaxxxguy May 29, 2008 (8:37 am)
When I drove CR-V, RAV4, Forester, etc., each one had strengths and weaknesses. Motor Trend and Car and Driver (latter comparo without the new Forester) pointed variations out in more detail than I can here. It also depends on how the vehicle is used and where driven. Though in its recent supercar mountain road compario, Edmunds put the STI last, they also wrote its suspension travel would give it an advantage on rougher roads.
#49 of 71 Re: Not good enough? [dcampagna] by ateixeira May 29, 2008 (9:14 am)
Replying to: dcampagna (May 29, 2008 3:55 am) The wheel bearings changed to a new, sealed design from model year 2003 onwards. The head gasket issue was addressed in 2002. Consumer Reports reliability ratings for engines show a notable improvement under the "Engine - Major" category right around that time, confirming the new gasket material was indeed better. I find it a little strange that you didn't experience that problem in 10 years yet that's one reason you left Subaru. Congrats on your CR-V.
#50 of 71 Forester...the previous genreration by subewannabe May 29, 2008 (7:12 pm)
I enjoy the back and forth regarding the 09 re-do. Unless Subaru secretly sold out to GM without telling anyone, I just dont see how anyone can ask for a better combination of utility and performance than a Forester XT. My 04 has 57K flawless miles and counting, and still hauls all the crap, tows what it cant haul, and passes Audis like they are standing still.
#51 of 71 Wood Grain by tkay May 30, 2008 (10:02 am)
Wonder if that could be a dealer installed option. It does look a heck of lot better. The silver plastic looks pretty rank!!
#52 of 71 C&D Preview by ateixeira Jun 02, 2008 (9:32 am)
They list 0-60 for the XT at 6.2 seconds, quicker than a V6 RAV4. MT got 6.6, and Edmunds got 6.8. That's what we've seen so far. The rest of the C&D review is generally positive but they didn't do a fully instrumented test, so hopefully we get more in a comparo soon.
#53 of 71 Re: Not good enough? [dcampagna] by p0926 Jun 02, 2008 (1:06 pm)
Replying to: dcampagna (May 29, 2008 3:55 am) Although I know it's subjective, I just can't get over how ugly the new CR-V looks. I much preferred the more functional/utilitarian look of the previous generation. As for Toyota having more reliable drivetrains... didn't I just read somewhere that Toyota felt it necessary to extend the warranties on older RAV4s due to drivetrain problems? Just goes to show you that nobody is perfect -Frank P.S. I agree with Juice, you go 10 years with no problems with either wheel bearings or head gaskets (both of which were addressed by Subaru) and then you use those as reasons why you didn't get another
#54 of 71 Re: Good article but odd pricing comparison [kurtamaxxxguy] by dcwestby Jun 27, 2008 (6:18 am)
Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (May 15, 2008 11:35 am) I find it also weird that any comparisons so far have refrained from mentioning the Nissan Rogue, even tho the Rogue is only a first year car... Replies to this message: kurtamaxxxguy (Jun 27, 2008 7:17 am) ateixeira (Jun 30, 2008 7:25 am)
#55 of 71 Re: Good article but odd pricing comparison [dcwestby] by kurtamaxxxguy Jun 27, 2008 (7:17 am)
Replying to: dcwestby (Jun 27, 2008 6:18 am) Motor Trend addressed that in its recent 5-way compario and I remember the Rogue coming in second, mainly because of the way it handled (ride was pretty harsh, though).
#56 of 71 Re: Good article but odd pricing comparison [dcwestby] by ateixeira Jun 30, 2008 (7:25 am)
Replying to: dcwestby (Jun 27, 2008 6:18 am) I think perhaps it's because the Rogue is a tad smaller and really pushes the styling envelope, so it's form over function. Forester is much more conservative, and function over form. One's an egg, the other is a box. We're practical so we prefer the box.
#57 of 71 2009 Forester Air Conditioner inadequacies by phdewi Jul 08, 2008 (3:31 pm)
Hey Has anyone with a new 2009 forester had trouble keeping comfortable in 80 to 90 deg days? My AC is not up to the task of keeping the car cool. On a sunny day, there is so much glass that the AC will not overcome the heat load. The dealer tested my AC and says that it meets factory specs. However I am still not able to keep the inside temperature below about 80deg, even with the recirculating air setting. Replies to this message: kurtamaxxxguy (Jul 08, 2008 3:47 pm) buckhuntr (Jul 16, 2008 6:47 pm) red927 (Jul 18, 2008 7:57 am)