You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Acura TSX
Article Comments - 2009 Acura TSX First Drive and Full Test

83 messages, Last post on Jul 28, 2009 at 2:15 PM
You are in the Acura TSX Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
First Drive: 2009 Acura TSX - First Impressions: Acura builds a better TSX for 2009, but it forgets to add a couple must-have ingredients (like chic styling, competitive power and raw desirability) to entice the young, sophisticated buyers it seeks. (more)
Full Test: 2009 Acura TSX - Bottom Line: A more relaxed and sophisticated commuter device than the original TSX, but it no longer makes the cut as a driver's car. (more)
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Mar 21, 2008 9:48 pm) These new buyers will not be car enthusiasts looking for a fun-to-drive car with good all around performance. So, Acura will no longer lure buyers from smaller sporty models (RSX, Civic, GTI, etc.). Now, when other car mfg's are listening to the current owners and the editors of magazines and making changes that people see as needed to stay with the brand, Acura maintains the same engine size in the TSX and doesn't add an AWD option. Even worse, it added 140 lbs. That doesn't help it stay competitive. Maybe they'll drop the RDX engine (240 hp, turbo) and SH-AWD system in it as a "Type S" model in 2010. We can only hope! It only makes sense. The first year shows off the new style and the 2nd year adds the goodies everyone has been expecting. Obviously, they will increase the price point in '09 too. Yeah, Acura will lose the enthusiast drivers, but will gain the female, empty nesters for this model in '09. Now, this makes sense why the 6-speeds are limited and why they have lower resale values than the automatics. More people buying these cars want automatic and aren't into the sporting driving characteristics. In regards to the VW R32, that is a completely different car with a different buyer. Those are more competitive with the rally racers (Evo and STi). A TSX is not a competitor to the R32, EVO or STi. Also, the person earlier mentioned reliability. So, you can drop the German cars off your list of Mfg's above. Grab any Consumer Reports magazine and Audi, VW and BMW have all black circles. People don't buy German cars for reliability. They are fun to drive, but do spend a lot of time in the shop. This is Acura and Honda's strength compared to those brands. Yes, an '07 or '08 model year will not yet have the bad marks against it in Consumer reports. It takes two years for the true reliability issues to come out. Or look at any "Consumer Review" of these cars on Edmunds and you'll see people saying they thought the new models would be more reliable and they were wrong. So, be wary of German makes if you want reliability. I considered buying the new VW Tiguan this spring. It is cool looking and has the 2.0T engine that is in many VW's and the Audi A4. Although, there have been so many issues with this engine in the different models, that I decided to look back at Acura again. I'm waiting for the next update to the RDX. |
|
|
Replying to: thundrbunny (Mar 22, 2008 11:17 am) The R32 is a very nice car, no doubt, but you're talking apples and oranges. The R32 costs $5,000 more than the TSX, and is a compact coupe. I don't think Acura is losing any sleep over the R32 - it's a market they're not interested in. I doubt if any TSX owners were laughing at you. I'm guessing they were all STI and Evo owners. |
|
|
Replying to: jay108 (Mar 22, 2008 12:54 pm) Depends on how you define "deal." Sorry, I guess I just don't get why you're trying to compare a compact sporty 2-door economy car to a larger less sporty 4-door near-luxury sedan. I guess I would equate it to saying the Honda CBR600 is a better deal than the Civic Si. There's no comparison - apples and oranges, as they say. |
|
|
Replying to: tbone12 (Mar 22, 2008 1:03 pm) Couldn't agree more with your entire post. Well said. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: tbone12 (Mar 22, 2008 1:03 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: thundrbunny (Mar 22, 2008 8:26 pm) And believe empirical data rather than anecdotes. |
|
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Mar 22, 2008 7:57 pm) I guess we can disagree on the value of the TSX. We are looking for a mini van replacement and with three kids, need a pretty good back seat, so the accord is the direction I want to go in. An accord with V6 and leather seems like a good deal at around $30K for us. My friends wife has the TSX and it's a bit tight for adult in the back, but it's fast and handles great. I'm probably too much of a tight wad to understand the value of 'near-luxury' cars. I look more at $/lb.
|
|
|
Replying to: jay108 (Mar 23, 2008 3:28 am) |
|
|
Replying to: jay108 (Mar 23, 2008 3:28 am) I think the perceived "value" of a car decreases rapidly as you climb up the luxury ladder. Down close to the luxury "bottom," I think $28,000 is a more than fair price for the TSX 's bigger/more powerful engine, more sophisticated suspension, electronic brake assist, auto transmission w/sport-shift, heated power leather seats, xenon headlights, trip computer, illuminated vanity mirrors, heated outside mirrors with integrated turn signals, 360W 8 speaker 6CD stereo w/2 subwoofers, Bluetooth, 2 driver memory settings, fog lights, more comfortable/luxuriously trimmed cabin, auto-dimming rearview mirror, remote operating sunroof, smoother/quieter ride, etc. It's a whole lot more car than a $21,000 Civic. On the other hand, park an Accord EX-L V6 next to a Mercedes E350 and, although the Merc is a beautiful car, you have to wonder what you get for the extra $25,000 it costs over the Honda. Bottom line - value is a personal judgment that is on sliding scale. Your definition of luxury, your income level, your vehicle priorities, etc. will all determine what you think is a "good deal."
|
|
|
Let's get some feedback on the article which is the subject of this discussion. Check the link at the top of the page.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Acura TSX
Article Comments - 2009 Acura TSX First Drive and Full Test
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Acura TSX



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats