Inside Line 2008 Comparison Test - Crossover vs. Minivan vs. SUV

38 messages, Last post on Mar 25, 2009 at 1:19 PM

You are in the Honda Odyssey Forum. Your Host is Karens

What is this discussion about? Honda Odyssey, GMC Acadia, Toyota Sequoia, Car Comparisons, SUV, Van

2008 Comparison Test: Crossover vs. Minivan vs. SUV - Put simply, neither the Sequoia nor the Acadia could touch the Odyssey's ability to swallow stuff, or its ease of loading and unloading passengers or cargo. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 3 of 5: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; Prev; Next; Last

#17 of 38 Data and Charts error by empowah Mar 10, 2008 (7:48 pm)
The '08 Acadia gets 16/22 in AWD form (new testing procedure), not 17/24.
#18 of 38 Re: Sticker Shock [altimadude00] by bobber1 Mar 10, 2008 (7:56 pm)
Replying to: altimadude00 (Mar 10, 2008 7:21 pm) You can buy stripped down versions of all these much closer to that price and still have more features then you would have gotten in a vehicle 10 years ago. When I buy one, I look at it as a 10 to 15 year investment, so the prices quoted don't bug me too much(however I only paid about $26,000 for pretty nice Honda Odyssey EX). Replies to this message: bobw3 (Mar 11, 2008 5:01 am)
#19 of 38 Re: Sticker Shock [bobber1] by bobw3 Mar 11, 2008 (5:01 am)
Replying to: bobber1 (Mar 10, 2008 7:56 pm) You're right...you can get a pretty well equiped Odyssey/Sienna for under $30K, which can't be said for a CUV/SUV. Inside the biggest difference is space behind the 3rd row, but then you can always load the roof if you can't stand being seen in a minivan!
#20 of 38 Please save us from these useless comparisons! by traveler73 Mar 11, 2008 (12:59 pm)
Why is it that every automotive magazine now has re-define the apples to oranges comparison by doing these pieces on dissimilar vehicles which will ultimately be purchased by very dissimilar people. These articles prove nothing except for the preference of the writers as there is little real basis for comparison. Please do us a favor and stop wasting space that could be afforded to more interesting and useful articles! Replies to this message: drive571 (Mar 11, 2008 2:27 pm) traveler73 (Mar 11, 2008 3:10 pm) bobber1 (Mar 11, 2008 3:20 pm) bobw3 (Mar 12, 2008 4:54 am) and 6 more... shoeymis (Mar 11, 2008 8:41 pm)
#21 of 38 Re: Please save us from these useless comparisons! [traveler73] by drive571 Mar 11, 2008 (2:27 pm)
Replying to: traveler73 (Mar 11, 2008 12:59 pm) These three vehicles, despite their engineering differences, are bought by the exact same demographic: spendy parents who have a real or perceived need for lots of seats and space. I frankly don't think there's any argument there. Replies to this message: traveler73 (Mar 11, 2008 3:10 pm) bobber1 (Mar 11, 2008 3:20 pm) bobw3 (Mar 12, 2008 4:54 am) brutus22 (Mar 12, 2008 11:07 am) and 5 more...
#22 of 38 Re: Please save us from these useless comparisons! [drive571] by traveler73 Mar 11, 2008 (3:10 pm)
Replying to: drive571 (Mar 11, 2008 2:27 pm) Try telling the Sequoia owner he or she is the same person that purchases an Odyssey--that's where demographics go astray ---sure the Honda and minivans in general are more utilitarian for the average person...but by that logic everybody would own one of the ugly things-----sorry, but some people who need that room, still would rather walk than admit the loss of their attractiveness, put on the sweat pants, and plop till they drop a load of kids into a minivan. Replies to this message: bobber1 (Mar 11, 2008 3:20 pm) bobw3 (Mar 12, 2008 4:54 am) brutus22 (Mar 12, 2008 11:07 am) bobw3 (Mar 13, 2008 10:17 am) and 4 more...
#23 of 38 Re: Please save us from these useless comparisons! [traveler73] by bobber1 Mar 11, 2008 (3:20 pm)
Replying to: traveler73 (Mar 11, 2008 3:10 pm) That sounds like one of those "oversensitive egos" described in the article.
#24 of 38 Re: the contenders [jkavanagh] by ahightower Mar 11, 2008 (6:04 pm)
Replying to: jkavanagh (Mar 10, 2008 5:37 pm) Maybe the standard size garage in "fly-over country" is bigger. Isn't 20' standard?
#25 of 38 Re: Please save us from these useless comparisons! [traveler73] by shoeymis Mar 11, 2008 (8:41 pm)
Replying to: traveler73 (Mar 11, 2008 12:59 pm) I couldn't agree more with your statement. Everybody knows that if you don't need to tow anything or ever go "off-road" that a mini-van wins the competition pretty much hands down. Let's face it a whole lot of people own boats, ATV's, snowmobiles, campers, etc. or just plain don't like mini-vans. For those people a mini-van is not even an option. The towing capacity of almost all car based mini-vans is 3500 lbs. Even a small 18ft boat ski boat will weight that much with gear in it, so the mini-van is useless to a family with a boat. And to get a Sequoia with all the luxuxy of a $43k Acadia you would probably be up above $50k so price vs options is definitely a decision that needs to be made if a person is actually trying to compare an Acadia and a Sequoia.
#26 of 38 Wise pick is the Acadia by dvsutton Mar 11, 2008 (10:38 pm)
I guess the only smart pick is the Acadia. If I want transmission problems and constant rotor replacements, along with dash rattles and sliding door failures, I would pick the Odyssey because those are all of the problems associated with my wifes Honda Odyssey that has 15k miles on it. If I want to have broken camshafts and engine failure due to sludge, of course I would pick the Toyota. Then they can deny any fault on their part for months while I threaten a lawsuit. Then finally come clean and call it a "service bulliten", that way the can escape any negetive media coverage about it. Just like the Toyota Camry I had. So The GMC Acadia would be my pick. Replies to this message: bobw3 (Mar 12, 2008 4:41 am)