Sign In Join 



Are The Japanese Poised to Dethrone the 911 AND the Z06?

194 messages,  Last post on Nov 24, 2008 at 12:05 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Nissan GT-R, Automotive News, Motorsports, Coupe


Messages Page 20 of 20
1
...
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#185 of 194
Re: Elated or tired of auto-mags anti-US bias? [revmatt] by bigmclargehuge
Aug 03, 2008 (8:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: revmatt (Aug 01, 2008 10:33 pm)

You're still not describing the GT-R accurately. Its not 'sporty' by any means, and certainly doesn't fit the description of 'family car.' Its a touring car. And a bang/buck borderline supercar.
 
Its not hype, its called data:
 
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0508_ct_GTRZ06911_chart.pdf
 
Same old stuff we already knew. If you want straight-line bragging rights, the Z06 always was the way to go.
 
And if any car has taken a lot of crap from the existence of the GT-R, its Porsche, not Chevy. The 997T came in last here, mind you. Its not an anti-American review.
 
If you expected the stock GT-R to be a 1/4-mile monster, you would have bought the wrong car. Hang out at NAGTROC, and I'm sure no knowledgeable person would have advised you to do that.
 
Why would you have bought a car you didn't prefer anyway just because your wife told you to? Keep the Mustang for cry-it-out-loud. Or get the Camaro when it comes out if that's your cup of tea.
 
But when you say 'the GT-R CANNOT keep up', thats probably more driver style than the car's ability. You can't drive it like a RWD car. It took me a long time switching between drivetrain types to get the confidence to toss and power through corners. Its really not the same style at all.
 
Its not feasible that with every magazine putting the GT-R around almost any track with corners faster than a Z06 is all hype. The Stig wasn't paid 2 years in advance to sandbag the Z06, because one day the GT-R might be sent to Top Gear. The Z06 is a 3-year old model. It was hot stuff when it came out, but it was bound to get beat at some point.
#186 of 194
Re: Elated or tired of auto-mags anti-US bias? [bigmclargehuge] by tedebear
Aug 03, 2008 (10:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: bigmclargehuge (Aug 03, 2008 8:10 am)

It's interesting that no one mentions the Viper ACR, although it finished ahead of both the GT-R and Z06, according to Road & Track. Perhaps that's the reason.
 
Here's the article: 4-Track-Free-for-All
 
Here's a quote from the article: "The results are clear. You want to go to the track? Buy a Viper ACR and destroy the competition for roughly $100,000. Want to amaze your friends by defying physics? Get a Nissan GT-R."
#187 of 194
Re: ACR [tedebear] by bigmclargehuge
Aug 03, 2008 (3:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tedebear (Aug 03, 2008 10:51 am)

From C&D:
 
the shocks have 13 compression settings and 18 rebound settings. Jeff Reece, an attending Chrysler engineer, suggested relaxing them back a notch or two for our undulating venue while jacking the ride height a quarter-inch to keep the body off the bump stops. As the Viper became more pliable, our courage returned and lap times fell. Car setup is in the ACR’s lesson plan, too.
 
Because every test the ACR wins, Chrysler sends an engineer to setup the suspension mid-test for optimum lap times. Its not like you get an engineer in the trunk at puchase. If the ACR was going to be the fastest with a single setup, they probably wouldn't have sent the engineer.
 
The drivers said that if the GT2 came with a Porsche engineer, the GT2 would have done much better as well. So putting things in perspective, that's why the ACR doesn't always get the credit.
 
Even for having a stock setup, the GT-R nearly keeps up with the 'tuned' ACR in the long-track test (Willow Springs) below.
 
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0908_cvr_willowsprings.pdf
 
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0908_cvr_streetsofwillow.pdf
 
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0908_cvr_autocross.pdf
 
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0908_cvr_oval.pdf
 
That's why its so impressive. On the high-speed courses its among the fastest stock setups out there. And keeps up on all the other courses as well.
 
It doesn't win everything, it has a niche.
#188 of 194
I thought this article was about the GT-R vs Z06 and 911? by revmatt
Aug 03, 2008 (3:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tedebear (Aug 03, 2008 10:51 am)

Add $20,000.00 worth of upgrades to the Z06 and GT-R and the Viper would not even be in the same race!
 
True, I am unaccustomed to awd. My previous SVTs and wifes Jag do not handle AT ALL like the GT-R!
It just feels odd! I do not get a real feel... "road talking to me" like my current other vehicles... or previous ones...
I still have a hard time BUYING the MT and R&T articles!
 
#189 of 194
Re: I thought this article was about the GT-R vs Z06 and 911? [revmatt] by tedebear
Aug 03, 2008 (4:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: revmatt (Aug 03, 2008 3:55 pm)

Add $20,000.00 worth of upgrades to the Z06 and GT-R and the Viper would not even be in the same race!
 
The same could be said of the ACR Viper if you add $20k worth of upgrades to it. The test was run with the original equipment from the factory.
#190 of 194
Re: I thought this article was about the GT-R vs Z06 and 911? [tedebear] by bigmclargehuge
Aug 03, 2008 (5:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tedebear (Aug 03, 2008 4:51 pm)

Here I'm going to have to agree with Revmatt,
 
The ACR already is a stripped out track horse. Do the same treatment to the Z06 (read: ultra-wide Michelin Pilot Sport Cups, aero tune + adjustable suspension + strip anything unnecessary from interior) and you'd have a factory C6R for 100K, which should give the ACR a significant run for its money.
 
Just because Dodge road-legalizes a club racer doesn't mean it maintains all the functionality of a touring car. The fact that the GT-R comes very close indeed to a tuned ACR says a lot.
#191 of 194
Re: I thought this article was about the GT-R vs Z06 and 911? [revmatt] by bigmclargehuge
Aug 03, 2008 (6:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: revmatt (Aug 03, 2008 3:55 pm)

Whereas I'm getting to be almost too confident when it comes to tossing an AWD car around corners and giving it the power. The traditional feedback from the steering wheel won't really exist in the same way.
 
Thats actually why the gamers have an easier time with driving rally-style cars. Their mind is trained to take queues only from the eyes, never the hands.
 
But I think its pretty unfathomable that:
 
MT
Edmunds
EVO magazine
R & T
Autocar
Top Gear
 
And a handful of others are all sandbagging other cars. Nissan has got to be doing something right.
#192 of 194
Re: I thought this article was about the GT-R vs Z06 and 911? [revmatt] by revmatt
Aug 03, 2008 (6:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: revmatt (Aug 03, 2008 3:55 pm)

$20,000.00 would bring the GT-R and Z06 closer to the cost of the Viper!
#193 of 194
Re: I thought this article was about the GT-R vs Z06 and 911? [revmatt] by bigmclargehuge
Aug 04, 2008 (5:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: bigmclargehuge (Aug 03, 2008 5:36 pm)

I watched this on Friday, but couldn't find it all weekend until I got back to work today and checked my history tab.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsP-4Cjm3mk
 
I'm not positive how good this guy's times actually are on this particular track, but it certainly does look like he's carrying tremendous speed through the corners.
 
Audi R8 sounds better though, IMO. I really wish that car has more power
 
The rest of the video is funny yet stupid.
#194 of 194
Thanks Captain Obvious! by bigmclargehuge
Nov 24, 2008 (12:05 pm)
Reply
Drivers Republic set out to prove a GT-R on Bridgestones is slower than a GT2... ok... we knew that already but they seem to feel like they've stuck automotive journalistic gold.
 
Result:
 
GT-R claim on Bridestones (dry): 7:38
GT2 claim (dry): 7:32
 
6 seconds faster
 
GT-R in the cold and wet on Bridgestones: 7:55
GT2 in the cold and wet: 7:49
 
6 seconds faster
 
Wow. Shocker.
 
This proves nothing about the GT-R on Dunlops, or how fast they are in the dry.
 
But this is exactly what Nissan claimed the results would be on those tires.
 
With both cars 17 seconds behind their claim, its only natural that if one would be faster than this, so would the other.
 
The only thing Sport Auto and Drivers Republic have managed to prove so far is that cars are not hovercraft. They slow down over water.

Messages Page 20 of 20
1
...
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement