Sign In Join 



Are The Japanese Poised to Dethrone the 911 AND the Z06?

194 messages,  Last post on Nov 24, 2008 at 12:05 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Nissan GT-R, Automotive News, Motorsports, Coupe


Messages Page 14 of 20
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
20
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#125 of 194
For those that are keeping score. by bigmclargehuge
Mar 20, 2008 (5:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bigmclargehuge (Mar 18, 2008 10:59 am)

Time to chalk another one up for Nissan
 
1) Edmunds tested this car's 0-60, 1/4-mile, slalom and skidpad against the 911 Turbo, the Z06, and the Viper. Result: resounding win for Nissan.
  
2) Autocar raced this car on a track against the M3 and the GT3. Result: resounding win for Nissan.
  
3) Evo.co.uk has now tested acceleration against the Z06, handling against the R8, and track time against the GT3. Result: resounding win for Nissan.
 
4) Road and Track tested 0-60, 1/4-mile, slalom, skidpad, and track time against the Porsche Turbo and the Z06. Result: resounding win for Nissan.
  
One thing of note, this was the US-Spec version. So any skeptics wondering if we're getting the real deal? We are.
 
"Simply put, the GT-R is the most potent automobile to ever come from Japan, and will surely have manufacturers in America and Europe rethinking their ways. If it weren't for the car's $69,850 asking price (an estimated $72,880 for our test car) — and the fact it wears a Nissan badge — the GT-R might well be considered the most exotic car on the planet."
 
I'm willing to believe 2 things:
 
1) The Z06 is capable of 0-60 in the high 2's and 1/4-mile in the high 10's, with a higher trap speed than the GT-R. So in a straight line, the Vette is still king.
 
2) The GT-R powers through corners like nothing else in its class. Its likely that the Nissan test drivers were not exaggerating or lying. The GT-R is, and always was, capable of a 7:35 Nurburgring time.
#126 of 194
Re: For those that are keeping score. [bigmclargehuge] by lemmer
Mar 21, 2008 (7:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: bigmclargehuge (Mar 20, 2008 5:58 pm)

The R&T article has made me a believer in the GT-R. They didn't really leave any room for discussion about which car was best on that track.
 
Porsche should just give up on AWD cars considering they've never created an AWD car that people liked as well as their RWD counterparts.
 
That all being said, the GT-R did get whipped in trap speed. It seems to be fading fast once you get much over a 100 mph. I would like to see what would happen on a higher speed track.
 
Also, for the lovers of the luxury/sports compromise, if you add up R&T's handling and ride scores, the Z06 is the winner.
 
For those who prefer driving excitement above all else (ok, this is me), the Z06 wins.
 
For track performance above all else, the GT-R is the winner...but I haven't heard anyone claim this is their primary requirement.
#127 of 194
Re: For those that are keeping score. [lemmer] by bigmclargehuge
Mar 21, 2008 (7:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemmer (Mar 21, 2008 7:21 am)

I disagree with Porsche dropping the Turbo.. I've long said it had untapped potential, and the GT-R proves that. A few tweaks and the 911 Turbo should be right back in the running.
 
I've actually gone so far to theorize that Porsche has intentionally restricted the Turbo, so that they don't offend the purist base. I have no evidence to that effect though, so its just a theory.
 
I don't deny that each of these cars was just as remarkable when it came out. The Z06 broke new ground for affordable performance. The 997T is actually quite good value next to its Ferrari competition. But its a few years later now, and Nissan wants to play.
 
So for this precise moment in time, that Nissan is my favorite of this bunch, but the ZR-1, C7 Z06, or 998 Porsches might be just as impressive.
 
I have no loyalty, I want them to battle it out so that we all get the best they can manufacture.
 
Kings are born first from conquest, second by inheritance.
#128 of 194
R&T Redux by lemmer
Mar 25, 2008 (5:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemmer (Mar 21, 2008 7:21 am)

There is a small firestorm going on in the R&T forums with some heavy allegations of sandbagging on the part of Millen. Based on all of the objective performance data, the other lap times sure seem a little slow in comparison to the GT-R. It doesn't help that he has links to the article on his website and states his company has big plans for this car. It seems like a substantial conflict of interest.
#129 of 194
Re: R&T Redux [lemmer] by bigmclargehuge
Mar 25, 2008 (7:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemmer (Mar 25, 2008 5:20 am)

You'd think R&T would have thought that through ahead of time. But allegations don't prove or disprove either side. I've seen plenty of loyalist excuses so far, and this potential conflict of interest just gives them ammunition.
 
However, there is still no evidence to suggest that the GT-R would not be faster than these 2 cars on a track, from any source.
 
The degree to which it is faster will have something to do with driver ability and familiarity with the vehicles. Professionals with the GT-R (and Millen is no exception) have come close to Enzo times on tracks already. So were the previous drivers in the Enzo 'sandbagging' so that a year later the GT-R might catch up? Not likely.
 
Even if all 3 were exactly the same speed, the fact that the GT-R can even accomplish that despite being significantly heavier already proves that the other 2 have untapped potential. They technically should be performing better than they are.
 
Its not the driver's fault if the 911T and Z06 can't catch an Enzo. That's Porsche and Chevy's fault, and it might just be physically impossible to do. If a driver in a GT-R can catch an Enzo.... well done Nissan.
#130 of 194
Re: R&T Redux [bigmclargehuge] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Apr 02, 2008 (7:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: bigmclargehuge (Mar 25, 2008 7:19 am)

Do you think ANY of these cars, showroom stock, could possibly sustain speeds over 175 mph for any length of time without hand-grenading? These speeds seem somewhat irrelevant to the real world.
 
The reason I see a bright future for the GT-R, and the reason I see it as ground-breaking, is that the platform seems to have a great deal of room for development, whereas cars like the Viper and Vette need to be re-invented for the future IMO.
#133 of 194
Re: R&T Redux [Mr_Shiftright] by tedebear
Apr 14, 2008 (2:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Apr 02, 2008 7:13 am)

I noticed the Nissan didn't dare go up against an 08 Viper ACR. With no cupholders you'd think the Viper wouldn't stand a chance but who knows.
 
Some of these magazine tests should be required to put a disclaimer at the start of the article on how much ad revenue each of the manufacturers in the test contributed.
#134 of 194
Re: R&T Redux [tedebear] by bigmclargehuge
Apr 15, 2008 (12:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tedebear (Apr 14, 2008 2:02 pm)

Give it time. The Viper ACR might be more in the same category as the lightened, strengthened GT-R Spec.-V. But it might be a while before we see those 2 go head-to-head in a test.

Messages Page 14 of 20
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
20
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement