Sign In Join 



Mazda5: No Traction/ Stability Control. Is this an issue?

71 messages,  Last post on Apr 07, 2009 at 11:22 AM

You are in the Mazda Mazda5 Forum. Your Host is Karens

What is this discussion about? Mazda MAZDA5, Car Safety, Van


Messages Page 2 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#8 of 71
Re: Mazda5: No Traction/ Stability Control. Is this an issue? [athenasius] by maltb
Mar 06, 2008 (7:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: athenasius (Mar 05, 2008 7:34 pm)

"but try to control the braking for 4 different wheels when going around a corner and one wheel starts to slip."
 
That's what Electronic Brakeforce Distribution is for (part of the ABS).
 
And perhaps it sounds like a manufacturer because I understand manufacturing (silly huh?).
 
Let's look at it this way. Let's say it costs $750k to develop DSC (a very low guess). Assuming sales of 10,000 cars a year and only the top 3% are going to get DSC. If we want to amortize the program over 2 years of sales, there's a $1,250 hit on each car. Now that we have killed the profit on the car, we can figure out what the components of the DSC cost.
 
Oh wait, you said they already have it at the factory. In that case, the factory should give it up for free and also certify it for the north american market (for free) as well.
 
I think next time my neighbor has his house painted, I'll see if I can get mine painted for the cost of the paint.
#9 of 71
Stability Control by mbros2k
Mar 08, 2008 (11:16 pm)
Reply
If you've done even a little homework, the answer is obvious...Do not even consider buying a new car without stability control. I complained to Mazda when the Mazda5 first came out, but to no avail. Too bad for Mazda5 sales, because there are lots of good cars out there with it, including most of Mazda's other fine models. Stability control is the greatest safety device since seat belts. Don't let yourself be fooled.
#10 of 71
Re: Stability Control [mbros2k] by coolmazda5
Mar 09, 2008 (4:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: mbros2k (Mar 08, 2008 11:16 pm)

I understand that for some owners stability control is essential, that is what I'm reading in this thread, yet if we do some homework you can see the numbers speak by themselves with regards to sales. These numbers come with ZERO marketing for the car. Mazda is happy that the Mazda5 sells on its own (mostly word of mouth), so not too bad sales after all huh? Yes, it is a relative small number but I believe their focus is on their cash cows, Mazda3, CX-7, CX-9 and they are preparing to launch the new Mazda6...
 
The MAZDA5 multi-activity vehicle, which has been freshened for 2008,
sold 2,021 units, a 29.1 percent increase, and the best month for the
vehicle since March, 2006. January sales were led in volume by MAZDA3,
which reported sales of 7,893 units.

 
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/03-03-200- - 8/0004766727&EDATE=
#11 of 71
Stability Control by mbros2k
Mar 09, 2008 (1:45 pm)
Reply
Sorry, a car without stability control just won't cut it with today's competition and emphasis on safety. A car without it should be ignored by any consumer who drives on public roads... Notice how Mazda has money to develop chrome grills with logos, satin finish gas caps, and rear spoilers. It just shows you where Ford's priorities lie, and why they're going broke fast.
#12 of 71
Re: Stability Control [mbros2k] by coolmazda5
Mar 09, 2008 (2:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mbros2k (Mar 09, 2008 1:45 pm)

Talking about doing some homework, what a shortsighted view you provide. Mazda is not a division of Ford, Ford owns a stake of Mazda, which is different. And stability control was created after ugly Ford, GM and Chrysler SUVs starting flipping around due to poor design, while Mazda actually has a very good one (it is not just badges and chrome). Its performance design principle makes the stability control a nice to have, but not essential.
 
As a real homework, read this article fully, that should give you more accurate information. I have extracted some highlights:
 
Quirky Japanese carmaker becomes fastest growing U.S. brand
 
Mazda's net profit increased to $627 million in the year ended March 31, 2007, from $568 million in 2006 and $427 million in 2005. The black ink puts it in stark contrast to Ford Motor Co., which owns a controlling stake in Mazda. Ford continues to lose U.S. market share and reported a $2.7 billion loss for 2007. That makes Mazda's contribution to Ford's coffers -- $204 million last year, up from $168 million in 2006 -- all the more welcome.
 
But Mazda provides Ford with something more valuable than cash. Mazda-designed architecture underlies most of Ford's new vehicles. The company has become a major part of Ford's research and development efforts, as well as the model for its new, global product development system.

 
http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080208/AUTO01/802080360&imw=- - Y
#13 of 71
Mazda by mbros2k
Mar 09, 2008 (2:48 pm)
Reply
#14 of 71
Mazda by mbros2k
Mar 09, 2008 (2:54 pm)
Reply
Mazda certainly makes some great cars! Stability control will appear on all their cars soon enough anyway, thanks to their own fine engineers, Consumer Reports, the Insurance Institute, the U.S Government and, yeah, guys like me.
#15 of 71
Re: Stability Control [mbros2k] by maltb
Mar 10, 2008 (8:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: mbros2k (Mar 09, 2008 1:45 pm)

Don't forget that satin finish fuel doors (not available for Mazda5) and rear spoilers (standard on Mazda5) sell cars; moreso than DSC. I can agree that this is sad, but it's what keeps the business going.
#16 of 71
Re: Stability Control [maltb] by mrbwa1
Mar 10, 2008 (2:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: maltb (Mar 10, 2008 8:10 am)

Don't forget that satin finish fuel doors (not available for Mazda5) and rear spoilers (standard on Mazda5) sell cars; moreso than DSC. I can agree that this is sad, but it's what keeps the business going.
 
Shouldn't that statement read: " Don't forget that satin finish fuel doors (not available for Mazda5) and rear spoilers make dealers money" ? After all, the dealer-installed options are where the profit is. That's why out dealer was probably willing to sell our 5 at invoice, as they still got like $250 for the auto-dimming mirror.
 
As for stability control, I really think it is a good thing, but don't really see it as a necessity. It sounds like the US is going to mandate it in the not so distant future, so then the argument will be a non-issue.
 
Either way, it seems like it should at least be an option/standard of the GT model and available on the touring and sport, even if it is part of some bundle with an MP3 stereo and moonroof (sport) (isn't that how they alwas package the must have items?)
#17 of 71
Re: Stability Control [maltb] by coolmazda5
Mar 10, 2008 (4:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: maltb (Mar 10, 2008 8:10 am)

This is a free market, you either buy it or buy something else (even a Rondo with ESC if you want), it is not my money after all. I respect people's requirements about ESC, no problem. I just gave my (solicited) opinion based on the experience of the 2 Mazda5 I own (one for almost 3 years, my 2nd one for almost 3 months).
 
What I disagree is the distorted facts presented in a car forum like this. Many members here claim to be car "experts" and seem to have tons of years in the forums, yet their replies seem completely off the real facts and sometimes based on purely personal feelings rather than informed reality. If you don't like Mazdas just say it, I don't care really, but don't invent BS theories around why they are making money or why not or why they are crap if the facts are not there to back them up.
 

Messages Page 2 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement