Sign In Join 



2009 Mazda5

44 messages,  Last post on Nov 25, 2008 at 1:37 PM

You are in the Mazda Mazda5 Forum. Your Host is Karens

What is this discussion about? Mazda MAZDA5, Future Vehicle, Van


Messages Page 3 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#15 of 44
Re: 2009 Mazda5 engine and ESC? [motormope] by coolmazda5
May 17, 2008 (5:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: motormope (May 16, 2008 11:57 am)

Other forum posted the Canada specs for 2009. No ESC nor 2.5L, changes in packages and colors only.
#16 of 44
Re: 2009 Mazda5 engine and ESC? [coolmazda5] by athenasius
May 18, 2008 (6:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: coolmazda5 (May 17, 2008 5:37 am)

what is the link to the other forum? please (just to prove i am Canadian and oh ever so polite eh lol )
#17 of 44
New Engine Rumors by chiefbongo
Jul 23, 2008 (10:49 am)
Reply
I'd read rumors of a new engine that got 1 mpg better gas mileage and added a few more horses to boot. I was driving past a Mazda dealership and decided to get a firsthand look at the interior and let my 3 year old clamber around in it.
 
The sales guy confirmed that the 2009 would have a new, improved engine. But, generally, details on other features are few and far between.
 
I'm in the burbs north of Seattle. We get rain like 200 days a year and a few days of light snow here and there. The 5 doesn't offer AWD or even traction control, so I'm wondering if they might be upgrading the safety features for 2009. I like the 5, but if they don't step up their game on safety, it's going to be a hard sell to the wife.
#18 of 44
New engine rumors? by wp746911
Jul 23, 2008 (7:21 pm)
Reply
Where are these rumors from? I would be interested in knowing if there was any solid information what the mazda5 will have in 2009. I guess I could just wait until September to see, but curious if someone knows...
#19 of 44
Minimal changes for 2009 Mazda5 by bargainseeker
Jul 28, 2008 (1:37 pm)
Reply
According to this press release, the Mazda5 will have minimal changes for 2009. According to it, the only changes for 2009 will be:
 
"New Liquid Silver exterior color to replace Sunlight Silver (late availability)
Sand interior color now available with Stormy Blue and Brilliant Black exterior colors."
 
Since we will not buy a family vehicle without Electronic Stability Control, that rules out the Mazda5 for us for at least another year.
#20 of 44
Re: Minimal changes for 2009 Mazda5 [bargainseeker] by coolmazda5
Jul 28, 2008 (6:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bargainseeker (Jul 28, 2008 1:37 pm)

yeah, that was my guess. The Mazda3 and the Mazda6 will keep Mazda busy at least for one more year. No ESC, that's OK...
#21 of 44
NO ESC = NO MAZDA5 FOR ME by autoholic75
Aug 08, 2008 (9:29 am)
Reply
NO ESC = NO MAZDA5 FOR ME
 
This should have been my first Mazda purchase and the start of a long valuable consumer relationship between Mazda and me. Instead, this glaring lack of proper, soon to be mandated, safety feature technology has bittered this consumer to the core. After patiently waiting, and taking the time to personally write (by both s-mail and e-mail way back in Feb) all explaining the expectations of ESC in the ’09 model; I am utterly disappointed they have stuck with the status quo; ignoring my (and many others) call for an updated M5 with ESC.
 
I am sure that by the time Mazda sees right; there will be lots of new space wagons as competition here in the US. Look for new products in late ’09-’10, that will surely all come with ESC standard. GM, Subaru, Honda and others are all rumored to have Mazda5 class competition under development. With the cost of fuel on the rise, and a move to smaller more efficient autos already apparent - this niche segment will expand rapidly. Mazda, who was poised to strike while the fire was hot, with an outstanding product in the Mazda5 (save the obvious oversight of no ESC) will blow this perfect opportunity to become a leader in a new segment. No, instead they have settled for a sub par safety reputation; choosing the easy road, the lazy road, the road that leads to mediocrity.
 
For me, I will move on to something else for my purchase. I cannot continue to wait for Mazda USA to wake up… a different brand for me, for sure. Likely, I will be less passionate about its shape and size than I was about the 5 - but at least I will be confident in it safety performance; which is the bottom line for first time parents – purchasing a car for their first new baby.
 
Mazda… you’re dead to me.
#22 of 44
Re: NO ESC = NO MAZDA5 FOR ME [autoholic75] by chiefbongo
Aug 08, 2008 (10:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: autoholic75 (Aug 08, 2008 9:29 am)

You know, I was thinking that way. But then I thought the auto safety statistics might be something like some of scare tactics the pharmaceutical industry uses to get you to buy medicine you don't need. And while ESC/DSC is a decent value add, the real statistics might surprise you.
 
I wrote an article titled
"Is Electronic Stability Control Worth It?". It doesn't say that it is or isn't. It goes into what your actual odds of an injury accident or fatal accident are, how the odds are influenced by ESC/DSC, and what your cost differential would be between the Mazda 5 and a Toyota Sienna. Then it's up to you to make up your mind.
 
Here's a quote... "They claim it will save 10,000 lives a year. In a population of 300,000,000, that puts your odds of being in the group of people whose lives were saved by Electronic Stability Control at 1 in 30,000 in any given year. If you're not in that 1 in 30,000 group, either you weren't in an accident at all, you weren't in a potentially fatal accident, or you were in a fatal accident, but you were one of the 20,000+ people who would still die anyway, Electronic Stability Control or not."
 
I ended up deciding that the Mazda 5 would be an okay choice. It really doesn't have much more cargo room than a Honda CRV, but the small size, sliding doors, and captain's chairs in the first two rows make it easier to fit into a tight garage, yet still get two little kids into the rear seats without having to back out first.
 
Last, worth noting... I have a new baby due in November. It will be our second, and I've been looking at the 5 as an upgrade from my 5-door. My current car has neither stability control or ABS (the 5 has ABS), but I carted first kid around in it in the snow without ever feeling it wasn't safe enough.
 
But, then again, I don't have a lead foot, I maintain a more-than-safe following distance to ensure I have plenty of reaction time, and I don't take my eye off the road while in motion, which probably puts me in a group of 1 in 30,000 drivers all by itself.
#23 of 44
Re: NO ESC = NO MAZDA5 FOR ME [autoholic75] by coolmazda5
Aug 08, 2008 (10:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: autoholic75 (Aug 08, 2008 9:29 am)

I understand your concern, but I think Mazda is not too worried of missing potential buyers today. The car keeps on selling like pancakes with ZERO advertising, there have not been any Mazda5 bad news related to the lack of ESC on the car since launched 3+ years ago (it is very well designed with low gravity center) and production is on full steam (they are named one of the fastest movers on the lots and dealers cannot get enough of them) so by the time it really sees it as a sales threat with ESC they'll just put one on (or just wait until is mandatory and put it in)...
#24 of 44
Re: NO ESC = NO MAZDA5 FOR ME [chiefbongo] by autoholic75
Aug 08, 2008 (1:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chiefbongo (Aug 08, 2008 10:16 am)

I hear what your saying and I would tend to agree with you that it might be a logical option to offer a choice of leaving DSC out…. say if cost was a concern. Maybe a manufacturer wants to provide discount pricing on a model to entice consumers who might otherwise shop models at a lower price point. So for some, who just want get into the segment, DSC may not be that critical and could be removed – not for me, but I understand the logic. However, to leave it entirely off a model, not even as a premium option, makes no sense at all; especially in a family hauler. This car is a mini-van for peat’s sake! Who builds a mini-van with without stability control? no one but Mazda.
 
For me this DSC thing is not an option. I made a decision long ago that my next car for my new family, would be a new one, with all the latest in safety features that money can buy, especially stability control (ESC/DSC). Basically, it comes down to a personal experience. Back 15 years ago, when I was just a kid, I lost control of a car at highway speeds and nearly paid the ultimate price. You would be amazed at how your priorities shift once you have spent nine days in intensive care. Lucky for me, I came out of it all just fine in the end – probably learned a valuable lesson as a teenager – to respect speed at an early age. Before you write me off to negligent teenage driving, know that I wasn’t… just simply avoiding an animal on the hwy. Also, prior to my accident I had 6 years of go-cart racing experience; and at the time, I thought I knew how to handle a vehicle in a dynamic situation. I had plenty of experience for sure. But no one can maintain 100% awareness all of the time – and even the best drivers in the world make mistakes.
 
I do agree that safe driving skills are fundamental for staying out of accidents. As coolmazda stated so well, all the safety system acronyms combined cannot protect a careless driver from themselves. I agree. But I am an engineer by profession, and by nature, I take nothing for granted when it comes to safety. The more, the better. For my loved ones, I want the state of the art; particularly since I don’t expect that I will be the one driving this car most of the time. Today’s family hauler eventually becomes JR’s crappy cruiser (people always forget this).
 
To top it all off, the DSC software and equipment have already been developed, deployed and tested on this model for all the other markets. Corporate Mazda USA executive, in their infinite wisdom, decided (I imagine in some expensive Southern California board room where the weather is always perfect and nobody at the table even knows what black ice is) …they decided that stability control is not worth bringing to the US consumers – that we somehow do not deserve/care for the very best in modern safety technology. So now Mazda USA decides to spend more money and more time to redesign and re-spec the US bound M5 units, so they can be sold in a sub-standard state. Ultimately, any cost savings made by removing the DSC parts for US markets are likely offset by the redesign, re-spec, re-certification costs incurred. So they spend more to offer less? This does not even account for the damage done to brand reputation and the obvious loss of sales to discerning customers who insist on DSC, like me.
 
This is not rocket science. Family cars need safety first.
Mazda USA blew it.

Messages Page 3 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement