Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Mitsubishi Outlander Mitsubishi Outlander vs. Subaru Forester
804 messages, Last post on Nov 26, 2009 at 11:55 AM
You are in the Mitsubishi Outlander Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: bigmclargehuge (May 16, 2008 10:30 am) I don't know, apparently Subaru owners do as Subaru underlines its "off-road" capability as strength and the Subaru fans here seem to promote the idea (see the passionate posts about the fraction of an inch advantage as well as the approach/departure angle posts). Having said that, I think having decent ground clearance on a CUV like the Outlander and Forester is great. Last winter I easily plowed through a feet of snow maybe more, in more than one occasion (lazy to shovel the driveway). I wouldn't try that with my car. To me, the Forester (2009) and the Outlander ground clearance (very similar) would be a selling point versus the ground clearance in the RAV4 and CRV. We indeed disagree here, but that's fine. It would be interesting to see, percentage wise, how many XTs Subaru sold for the previous generation. My bet is that it was around 10-15% perhaps. I think the only reason Subaru still included the XT model in their US lineup was not because they sold well, but because they didn't want to completely upset their fan base. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dodo2 (May 16, 2008 10:45 am) As it stands, going mainstream means giving away whatever percentage their niche market was away to the competition. |
|
|
Replying to: dodo2 (May 16, 2008 10:45 am) Not sure about all XT's, but IIRC, only 3% of Forester sales were M/T XT's. They didn't sell well because Subaru sucks at advertising their products. Speaking of advertising, I don't think I've ever seen a TV ad for an Outlander. I don't recall seeing a TV ad for any Mitsubishi for that matter. Maybe I just ignore them. 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dcm61 (May 16, 2008 10:56 am) Totally agree with this. They really should have marketed them as versatile alternatives to boring cars and SUVs. If I had known that I could get a Forester to keep pace with any number of sports cars, while retaining safety, reliability, economy, 4-door/wagon utility, and offroad ability; I certainly would have dropped by the dealership much sooner. As it was, I was very biased AGAINST Subaru until I was forcefed their full potential in the passenger seat. Likewise I have never known anyone else to buy one until until I gave them a ride BigMcLargeHuge style  They sell 99% word-of-mouth, and its entirely their own fault that there are a select few that know what they are capable of. |
|
|
Replying to: dcm61 (May 16, 2008 10:56 am) They did have few ad campaigns on TV, both in the US and Canada. |
|
|
Replying to: dodo2 (May 16, 2008 8:25 am) And yes, it can be turned off (actually the threshold is higher but it's not totally disabled) so that you can rock out of a snow bank. ABS = maximize 4 wheels stopping. AWD = maximize 4 wheels going. Ideally, you want both. FWD are not inherently unsafe, it's just that AWD has more safety potential and giving up that benefit when you pay for AWD seems silly when you don't have to. I would just leave it in 4WD auto all the time. I'm not sure I'd even use the Lock mode. If it truly does lock the axles together (or do they mean it locks the power split?), then you'd have problems in sharp turns with binding. So if the Auto 4WD mode really works, it would turn off and on when needed. With Lock, you'd have to hit the button for each sharp turn or U-turn, then back on, then off again, then on, and so on. If Auto works well, both other modes are unneeded, IMHO.
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (May 16, 2008 11:35 am) With Lock, you'd have to hit the button for each sharp turn or U-turn, then back on, then off again, then on, and so on. IMO, Lock is a very poor naming choice for that mode. If I understand the Mitsubishi press release, you can drive 100K miles or more in Lock mode and it won't hurt the drivetrain. The Lock mode differs from the Auto mode in that it "locks" in a more rear bias power split (50% more than Auto mode). Once again, a very poor naming choice. Something like Sport would be a much better choice. In fact, the press release mentions using the Lock mode for more spirited driving.
|
|
|
Replying to: biscuit_xls (May 16, 2008 9:29 am) |
|
|
Replying to: dodo2 (May 16, 2008 10:45 am) Apparently Mitsubish owners don't care about off-road but care about towing. There were many passionate posts about the difference in towing abilities between the two cars.
|
|
|
Replying to: kdshapiro (May 16, 2008 11:58 am) That's right. Towing was also passionately discussed, but how does your comment relate to the current conversation? Personally, I don't care about towing or any kind of off-roading where the approach/departure angle would matter. I care about snow, mud and some moderate logging trails where the 4WD and ground clearance matters. |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Mitsubishi Outlander Mitsubishi Outlander vs. Subaru Forester
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mitsubishi Outlander
2010 Subaru Forester
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
