Sign In Join 



Mitsubishi Outlander vs. Subaru Forester

666 messages,  Last post on Nov 12, 2009 at 1:56 AM

You are in the Mitsubishi Outlander Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mitsubishi Outlander, Subaru Forester, Car Comparisons, SUV


Messages Page 31 of 67
1
...
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
...
67
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#296 of 666
Re: Test Drove an Outlander [dodo2] by p0926
May 07, 2008 (6:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dodo2 (May 07, 2008 5:51 pm)

Some time reading the RAV4 and CRV dedicated forums and maybe you will have a different perspective
 
I doubt it. Online forums by their very nature tend to distort problems. In fact that's one of my biggest beefs with Edmunds... any old crackpot can start a new topic with the primary intent of bashing a given make and model Then the unsuspecting visitor drops in to do some research about a vehicle they're thinking about buying and they get cold feet because of all the negative stuff they see posted.
 
Has Honda's and Toyota's quality slipped some? I would agree that yes they have slightly but thye're still the industry standard. Here's an excerpt from Motor Trend's current cute-ute comparison test:
 
"As with all Hondas, everything about the CR-V feels like it's built to tolerances alien to the hands of slapdash humans"
 
So while the other Japanese manufacturers (Misubishi, Mazda, Nissan and Subaru) all have admirable records, IMO, they are still a step (albeit slight) below Honda and Toyota.
 
-Frank
#297 of 666
Re: Test Drove an Outlander [p0926] by kdshapiro
May 07, 2008 (6:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: p0926 (May 07, 2008 6:19 pm)

So while the other Japanese manufacturers (Misubishi, Mazda, Nissan and Subaru) all have admirable records, IMO, they are still a step (albeit slight) below Honda and Toyota.
 
While there are a few things that irk me about the Forester, fit or finish aren't either. No doubt the higher end RAV4 or CRV are higher end than the Forester in terms of accutrements. But for what it is, the stuff on the Forester works fine. My only warranty repair necessary or that was needed to date was a broken plastic, rear seat switch flipper downer thingy.
#298 of 666
Re: Test Drove an Outlander [dodo2] by steve_ HOST
May 07, 2008 (6:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dodo2 (May 07, 2008 11:54 am)

(although all cars today have rather soft paints due to environment regulations)
 
I think that's an urban legend. Just because modern paints don't contain lead and have low VOC, the advances in formulation and application (electroplating, clearcoats, etc.) has more than made up for any perceived advantages of paint from the 50's or 80's.
 
Then there's auto paint getting tested in Japan that's self-healing and will actually fix the odd scratch over a week or so, but I haven't heard much about it lately.
 
Meanwhile, some 3M or Stoneguard film may be worth it to you.
#299 of 666
Re: Test Drove an Outlander [steve_] by dodo2
May 07, 2008 (7:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (May 07, 2008 6:43 pm)

Then there's auto paint getting tested in Japan that's self-healing and will actually fix the odd scratch over a week or so, but I haven't heard much about it lately.
 
IIRC Nissan EX35 has such paint (standard or optional I'm not sure).
 
Could be an urban legend, but I have seen countless posts from owners of many brands, including luxury brands, complaining about the paint chips.
 
Sure, some 3M clear film is your friend ....
#300 of 666
Re: Test Drove an Outlander [p0926] by dodo2
May 07, 2008 (7:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: p0926 (May 07, 2008 6:19 pm)

If you spend some time on the model-dedicated forums I'm sure you'll gather a lot of first-hand real life reports. I'm not talking about forums like Edmunds.com, MotorTrend, C/D where non-owners or occasional posters come and go without bringing anything to the table. Also, the car magazines reviews are the least trusted sources of information IMO. Most of the times they are full of inaccurate and unsubstantiated information.
 
I agree that Honda and Toyota have a slight edge over the other Japanese manufacturers from certain stand points, but they are not a guarantee for a trouble-free ownership by any means. The thing that I will argue about is that this slight difference is blown out of proportions by the car magazines and perpetuated by the vast majority of the buyers that only use the car magazines and main online auto outlets as their sole source of information.
Again, personally, I wouldn't have a problem to buy the vehicle I like from any of the Japanese manufacturers today.
#301 of 666
Re: Test Drove an Outlander [ateixeira] by dodo2
May 07, 2008 (8:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (May 07, 2008 12:41 pm)

Note the photo on the right of this page, how there is unpainted black cladding on many of the lower portions of the Forester, surely that's an attempt to prevent chips by design.
 
The Outlander has the same plastic cover on the rocker panel, but that's not where the chipping occurs. The vulnerable areas are the lower part of the doors and the bulging part of the fender/rear door. Mitsu also put some clear film on, but it's just not enough.
I'm yet to check out the Forester, but it's just my gut feeling that it's exposed to the same problem. When you get the car, drive through some mud an see where the dirt collects on the side of the car.
Luckily, there are ways to protect the Outlander from this issue. I wish Mitsu had done it from the factory, but I'll end up doing it on my own anyway. Not overly concerned about it. I got few paint chips myself, from before I put the mud guards on, but they are easy to touch up and when I'm done, they'll be covered by the clear film and the door side garnish I bought from Japan (Mitsu accessory).
#302 of 666
Re: Test Drove an Outlander [ateixeira] by craigl
May 08, 2008 (7:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (May 07, 2008 9:15 am)

I just think some of you could be a lot more helpful and do something constructive instead of having a knee-jerk reaction to any and all criticism of the Outlander.
 
Amen.
#303 of 666
Re: .. [rcpax] by ateixeira
May 08, 2008 (7:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: rcpax (May 07, 2008 2:24 pm)

The person I was referring to did have his bumper re-painted free of charge. That's why I brought it up.
 
What I'm saying is if someone comes to complain about a problem, instead of arguing with him or her and getting defensive about how great your [insert model name here] is, why not try to help them out?
 
This is why I provided the 800 numbers for both Subaru and Mitsubishi.
 
In a tight-knit owner community you might even see a letter writing campaign to get one particular problem fixed for free.
 
In other words, instead of alienating someone who comes to complain, try to help them out instead.
 
Test out my theory. Go to a Subaru thread, tell them you are shopping for a used Forester, and ask what sort of flaws to look for. What you will get is full disclosure - look for wheel bearing issues on models prior to the 03 redo, head gaskets on the 99-02 models, check the front and rear main seals for oil leaks, drive in a figure 8 to test the diffs, etc.
 
For Mitsubishi you get "this the most reliable car in the world and you have a 10 year warranty" but noone tells you dealers only fix 44% of the problems that come up to your satisfaction.
 
Is the warranty even transferable? I will not be surprised if I don't get an answer.
#304 of 666
Re: .. [ateixeira] by biscuit_xls
May 08, 2008 (9:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (May 08, 2008 7:53 am)

It's one thing to complain, but when the person declares that the vehicle/manufacturer is not even worth considering because a single issue then it usually results in flames. It's a few rock chips, get over it, protect your vehicle, or buy something else.
#305 of 666
Re: .. [ateixeira] by dodo2
May 08, 2008 (9:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (May 08, 2008 7:53 am)

Test out my theory. Go to a Subaru thread, tell them you are shopping for a used Forester, and ask what sort of flaws to look for. What you will get is full disclosure - look for wheel bearing issues on models prior to the 03 redo, head gaskets on the 99-02 models, check the front and rear main seals for oil leaks, drive in a figure 8 to test the diffs, etc.
 
Test this theory - go to a Subaru thread and start telling them that the Outlander is better (just because you say so) and they all have a crappy car from a crappy company. This is what's going on here.
People knowing nothing to little about the vehicle and the company nor have any interest in buying it, come here and start bashing.
 
Now, go to the other dedicated Outlander forums, where only people owning the car or interested in buying one come over and share their experience and ask questions. The things are totally different.

Messages Page 31 of 67
1
...
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
...
67
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement