Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Mitsubishi Outlander Mitsubishi Outlander vs. Subaru Forester
799 messages, Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 1:52 PM
You are in the Mitsubishi Outlander Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: busta4 (May 06, 2008 9:44 am) Fuel mileage on all of the competing CUV's is going to be within a few points either way. The 4 cylinder models don't get that great of mileage in real world usage because you have to work the engine harder just to get going. The turbo engines suck fuel like crazy if you use the power aggressively. My Outlander has ZERO rattles after 14,000 miles... I can't say that for my other two cars (both Honda's). |
|
|
Replying to: biscuit_xls (May 06, 2008 11:22 am) As to forgettable performance, I was writing in general about the handling, braking, acceleration, turning radius, etc. The Outlander does fine in all those areas, but it didn't make a lasting impression one way or the other.
|
|
|
Replying to: craigl (May 06, 2008 12:20 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: p0926 (May 05, 2008 8:31 pm) I have 3 kids, that's why we got the Odyssey. One in a regular seat, one in a booster, and one in a full car-seat. The new Accord is just about wide enough to still seat all three in the back. We'll see... Regarding craigl's Outlander test-drive. While "feel" of a cars' handling will always depend on personal preference, it's worthy to note that in terms of raw numbers, the Outlander handles better than the RAV4 in all aspects except acceleration (and, depending on the source, braking). But again, that's just by the numbers. You gotta go with what "feels" right for you. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: craigl (May 06, 2008 12:20 pm) "Handling, braking... turning radius" I think you need to take that test drive again, the Outlander does great in those categories. Best in class in my opinion, and I drove everything at least twice before I made my purchase. |
|
|
Replying to: craigl (May 06, 2008 12:20 pm) Of course it won't, because it's a Mitsubishi Outlander. But if it was a Toyota Outlander or a Honda Outlander, it will. 
|
|
|
Replying to: craigl (May 06, 2008 7:38 am) That's why "..The automatic transmission is almost as smooth as the new CR-V's, while the engine provides considerably more power. The combination is far superior to the RAV4 despite the Toyota's higher horsepower figure, the Outlander is a better highway companion overall.... the Outlander handles steeply banked highway onramps with superb control and minimal body lean, giving the driver a sense of confidence not found in many SUVs — compact, car-based or otherwise.The ride was also car-like. Bumps were softly muted and road noise was minimal...Available with an optional manual four-wheel-drive system, the Outlander is one of the more affordable four-wheel-drive SUVs on the market, ...Surprisingly, the new Outlander seems to outclass its competitors on just about every front, although the RAV4 does offer more power with its optional V-6 engine (269 horsepower)." |
|
|
Replying to: craigl (May 06, 2008 7:38 am) Oh, and if you live in a snow area, be aware that the in the RAV4 you cannot easily turn off the VSC system and you may get stuck on few inches of snow (again check the above mentioned forum for more information). Other than that, buy which ever car is best for you.
|
|
|
Replying to: dodo2 (May 06, 2008 10:24 pm) Do we really need to ask busta4 to elaborate on what exactly he meant by "you get what you pay for"? No vehicle is perfect. Toyota sells a ton of them, so there will be more owners to complain if a problem creeps up. People here have said CR rates the Outlander as reliable so far, sure, but CR also measured satisfaction with dealer repairs and only 44% of owners were satisfied. Among manufacturers they were 2nd to last, beating only VW (infamous for terrible dealer service). Maybe busta4 is among that other 56% that cannot get their problems fixed in a satifactory manner at a Mitsubishi dealer? And the other poor guy with the peeling paint? It's a good thing the Outlander has been reliable for most people. Imagine if it wasn't! Instead of defending Mitsubishi, why don't you guys help them out and write letters to Mitsubishi to take action to fix these issues? That's what forums like these are for. I just think some of you could be a lot more helpful and do something constructive instead of having a knee-jerk reaction to any and all criticism of the Outlander. |
|
|
Replying to: busta4 (May 06, 2008 9:44 am) In the spirit of trying to help, have you called 1-800-222-0037 to complain directly to Mitsu corporate? Open up a case number and ask them to put pressure on your dealer to fix the car to your satisfaction. Don't give up, keep calling until some action is taken. Remember you are in the majority - 56% of Mitsubishi owners are not satisfied with the service they are getting from their dealers. The number for Subaru is 1-800-SUBARU3 by the way, because no car is perfect. If you think it affects the safe operation of the vehicle, and this goes for any model, file a report with the NHTSA ODI (Office of Defects Investigation), here is a link for that: http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/ivoq/index.cfm Competition is good, and improves the breed. The last thing we want is for any competitor in this segment to become complacent. |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Mitsubishi Outlander Mitsubishi Outlander vs. Subaru Forester
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mitsubishi Outlander
2010 Subaru Forester
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
