You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Acura TL
Acura TL 1999-2003

84 messages, Last post on Nov 13, 2009 at 6:34 AM
You are in the Acura TL Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: rem1997 (May 05, 2009 12:30 pm) |
|
Thanks for the advice! I have checked the VIN# against the supposed affected vehicles and it did not fall within that range, however I have heard of other consumers having problems with vehicles that didn't fall within this range. I will try to obtain the name of the previous owner and check carfax and with Acura as well. Thanks again for your helkp, I feel like I'm taking a big gamble with this car.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: rem1997 (May 05, 2009 9:00 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: hpmctorque (May 06, 2009 12:29 am) |
|
Just wanted to update those interested that I decided against the used 2003 TL. I got the name of the old owner and discovered that it has been in at least 2 accidents. That being said on top of the potential tranny issues was enough to turn me off. I have, however located a 1997 Acura 2.5 RL with just one owner and only 14,000 miles!!!!!!!!!! Seems unreal, I'm thinking it was an elderly person's car. I'm going to try to go check it out tomorrow, it is a little over an hour away from where I reside. They're asking $8995 for it, I'm hoping to talk them down to $7500. Cross your fingers that I get there before another Acura obsesser beats me to the punch!
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: rem1997 (May 06, 2009 9:50 pm) Now, regarding the low mileage 1997 Acura you mentioned, there's no such thing as a 2.5 RL. Acura made a 2.5 five cylinder TL and a 3.2 V6 TL, and a 3.5 RL, but the model designation you mentioned doesn't exist. The good news is that the three models mentioned above are solid cars but, obviously, old. The 2.5 TL was the successor to the 2.5 Vigor, and, except for the engine, is very similar to the 3.2 TL of that year. The 2.5's suspension was tuned more for sportiness, the 3.2's for luxury. The 3.5 RL is a larger luxury car than the TLs. It's good, but some would say it's somewhat boring. The mileage, 14,000 miles over 12 years, is good and bad. The good part is obvious. As for the bad, if the car sat for months at a time, say, that's not such a good thing. I'd try to find out about the maintenance, why it was driven so little, and how it was driven. Good luck, and let us know what happens.
|
|
|
Replying to: hpmctorque (May 07, 2009 5:08 am) The car was owned by an elderly lady who just passed away and her family traded her car in to purchase an Audi....silly them
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: rem1997 (May 08, 2009 11:17 am) Why did you get rid of the Vigor you loved so dearly?
|
|
|
Replying to: hpmctorque (May 08, 2009 7:40 pm) As long as Acuras continue to be good to me, I will be a lifelong customer!
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: rem1997 (May 08, 2009 8:14 pm) Circling back to the very low mileage RL you're considering, be prepared to change the fluids, belts and hoses if the haven't been replaced according to the schedule in the owner's manual (not the Acura dealer's schedule). Belts and hoses, and some fluids (eg. brake fluid and coolant, but not engine oil) not only wear with mileage, but also deteriorate with age. If the car checks out, it should provide excellent service for you. |
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Acura TL



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats