Sign In Join 



Acura TL 1999-2003

84 messages,  Last post on Nov 13, 2009 at 6:34 AM

You are in the Acura TL Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Acura TL, Sedan


Messages Page 8 of 9
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#67 of 84
Considering a Used 2003 TL by rem1997
May 05, 2009 (12:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: satforn (May 04, 2009 11:05 am)

Hello to all. I have been looking at some used 2003 Tl's and found one for $8000 with 86,600 miles on it. This was what I believed to be a pretty good deal until I did some research and discovered the potential tranny problems. What a bummer, I had a 1992 Acura Vigor which was the best car ever and I have been looking forward to trading in my 2000 Impala and becoming an Acura owner again. So, based on all the consumer information I guess it won;t be in my or my budget's best interest to invest in a 2003 TL, I am VERY dissappointed in Acura
#68 of 84
Re: Considering a Used 2003 TL [rem1997] by u151208
May 05, 2009 (8:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rem1997 (May 05, 2009 12:30 pm)

You could do some research and verify if the transmission was already replaced by Acura. If so, then I would think it's a good investment. Most 03's (based on my research) don't have tranny problems as the issue was rectified for the previous years. I own an 02 TLS and had my tranny replaced for free 86k due to a warranty the vehicle still had. I am sure all warranties are probably void now for 2nd year gen TL's. As of right now I'm 123k, I have no problems and the power is great! Do some research, contact Acura with the VIN # and see if its already been replaced. Good luck.
#69 of 84
Thanks by rem1997
May 05, 2009 (9:00 pm)
Reply
Thanks for the advice! I have checked the VIN# against the supposed affected vehicles and it did not fall within that range, however I have heard of other consumers having problems with vehicles that didn't fall within this range. I will try to obtain the name of the previous owner and check carfax and with Acura as well. Thanks again for your helkp, I feel like I'm taking a big gamble with this car.
#70 of 84
Re: Thanks [rem1997] by hpmctorque
May 06, 2009 (12:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: rem1997 (May 05, 2009 9:00 pm)

Please let us know what you finally decide, and why. Thanks.
#71 of 84
Re: Thanks [hpmctorque] by rem1997
May 06, 2009 (4:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (May 06, 2009 12:29 am)

I sure will. I should have joined this site long ago.
#72 of 84
No 2003 TL for me by rem1997
May 06, 2009 (9:50 pm)
Reply
Just wanted to update those interested that I decided against the used 2003 TL. I got the name of the old owner and discovered that it has been in at least 2 accidents. That being said on top of the potential tranny issues was enough to turn me off. I have, however located a 1997 Acura 2.5 RL with just one owner and only 14,000 miles!!!!!!!!!! Seems unreal, I'm thinking it was an elderly person's car. I'm going to try to go check it out tomorrow, it is a little over an hour away from where I reside. They're asking $8995 for it, I'm hoping to talk them down to $7500. Cross your fingers that I get there before another Acura obsesser beats me to the punch!
#73 of 84
Re: No 2003 TL for me [rem1997] by hpmctorque
May 07, 2009 (5:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: rem1997 (May 06, 2009 9:50 pm)

Thanks for the update, rem.
 
Now, regarding the low mileage 1997 Acura you mentioned, there's no such thing as a 2.5 RL. Acura made a 2.5 five cylinder TL and a 3.2 V6 TL, and a 3.5 RL, but the model designation you mentioned doesn't exist. The good news is that the three models mentioned above are solid cars but, obviously, old.
 
The 2.5 TL was the successor to the 2.5 Vigor, and, except for the engine, is very similar to the 3.2 TL of that year. The 2.5's suspension was tuned more for sportiness, the 3.2's for luxury. The 3.5 RL is a larger luxury car than the TLs. It's good, but some would say it's somewhat boring.
    
The mileage, 14,000 miles over 12 years, is good and bad. The good part is obvious. As for the bad, if the car sat for months at a time, say, that's not such a good thing. I'd try to find out about the maintenance, why it was driven so little, and how it was driven.
 
Good luck, and let us know what happens.
#74 of 84
Re: No 2003 TL for me [hpmctorque] by rem1997
May 08, 2009 (11:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (May 07, 2009 5:08 am)

My mistake, the Acura I am looking at is indeed a 3.5 RL. You provided a lot of good background information about Acura's and now I see why I am drawn to the TL model...it reminds me of my Vigor I loved so dearly!
 
The car was owned by an elderly lady who just passed away and her family traded her car in to purchase an Audi....silly them Someone had put a deposit on the car but financing hadn't officially gone through. If it doesn't I should be next in line to get it. We'll see what happens!
#75 of 84
Re: No 2003 TL for me [rem1997] by hpmctorque
May 08, 2009 (7:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rem1997 (May 08, 2009 11:17 am)

Good luck!
 
Why did you get rid of the Vigor you loved so dearly?
#76 of 84
Re: No 2003 TL for me [hpmctorque] by rem1997
May 08, 2009 (8:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (May 08, 2009 7:40 pm)

Thanks! The only reason I traded my Vigor in was because after I had my son I realized just how small the backseat was. His infant seat literally touched the back of my drivers seat, and I'm only 5'1".
 
As long as Acuras continue to be good to me, I will be a lifelong customer!

Messages Page 8 of 9
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement