Sign In Join 



2009 Audi A4

337 messages,  Last post on Nov 20, 2009 at 2:22 PM

You are in the Audi A4 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Audi A4, Sedan


Messages Page 4 of 34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
34
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#31 of 337
Re: Premium grade gasoline in A4 [shipo] by markcincinnati
Aug 04, 2008 (6:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Aug 03, 2008 6:17 pm)

You have such patience. We have, as you are well aware, Shipo, discussed this issue incessantly -- and recently.
 
Why would anyone question the mfgr's fuel octane requirements, as if the mfg COULD get away with requiring a fuel the car really hasn't been engineered to use?
 
Yet, you patiently -- and correctly -- respond.
 
Me? Well I would be tempted to respond, "what in the wide wide world of sports would possess you to WANT to decrease both your mileage and power while simultaneously increasing the potential risk to the engine and increasing your costs?"
 
Thankfully, you have the ability to respond, er, with patience, understanding and decorum.
 
Speaking of premium sucking cars: my 2009 A4 with the 19" wheel sport package has been delayed until week 37 with delivery about 6 weeks thereafter.
 
As you may recall, I went with the 4 cylinder, premium sucking model with most of the optional extra boxes checked. I am, as of now, expecting an MSRP of about $45K -- wow! $45K for a 4 cylinder -- hope that 258 pound feet at 1500 makes it worth it. Heck, that seems not that much less than my 2005 A6 (AFTER discount).
 
I am still excited about the thing, however.
 
I must say, that at 57,000 miles on my A6, the thing is darn near STILL flawless and fun to drive. At this point, keeping it would not be punishment.
 
Hopefully there are no further delays on the new A4, tho.
 
Keep the patience.
 
You are my rock.
 
My attempt to be patient: it says "requires premium" it means that using less is a false economy. Use regular in your new premium sipper if your goal is to spend more and get less.
 
I wish I had THAT kind of money.
 
Drive it like you live.
#32 of 337
Re: Premium grade gasoline in A4 [markcincinnati] by shipo
Aug 04, 2008 (7:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: markcincinnati (Aug 04, 2008 6:40 pm)

Thanks Mark! I guess I'm getting mello in my old age.
 
FWIW, it is looking reasonably certain that my next long term contract will have me driving about 600 miles per week, and at current gas prices, that's an "OUCH!" Assuming this contract comes through, I've decided to eschew the A3 that I've been lusting after and opt instead for a GTI 6-Speed (the 3-pedal version) with the new CCTA engine (i.e. the same engine as in your new A4 sans the new "Valve Lift" technology). Why? Well, both to cut my depreciation costs (how are three year old cars with nearly 100,000 miles on the clock worth these days?) as well as to keep my gasoline costs to a minimum (while still having a fun car to drive for the duration).
 
Keep us posted on your driving impressions of the A4.
 
Best Regards,
Shipo
#33 of 337
Re: Premium grade gasoline in A4 [markcincinnati] by rjlaero
Aug 05, 2008 (5:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: markcincinnati (Aug 04, 2008 6:40 pm)

There is a backorder on all 2009 A4's with 19 inch wheels and S line package. Even the A5 can't be ordered with the upgraded 19's or sport package. There is a supplier problem and they can't make enough of the rims.
 
The premium and premium plus are very good values on the 09 A4 2.0T Q.
 
For under 37k on the premium plus, you get the xenons, led's, bluetooth, dual power and heated/memory seats, ipod, and more. A current convenience package 08 A4 2.0T model is the same price.
 
The prestige is kinda pricey 40k, and it's too bad you have to spend $3300 more to get the advanced key and bang and olufson & 18's. They bundle that with the lane assist. I don't know how many people car about lane assist on an A4.
#34 of 337
quattro and mileage by willbuyan09
Aug 05, 2008 (8:30 pm)
Reply
When can I see one in Colorado?
 
Also, I need quattro. Can I get the 2.0 w Quattro? On the Avant? Anyone know anything about the gas milege?
#35 of 337
irisheyes by m4d_cow
Aug 05, 2008 (10:33 pm)
Reply
I'm not sure there'll ever be A4 cabrio again, I heard theyre switching it to A5 cabrio for 2010 model. Well.... just imagine a topless A5, cool isnt it?
#36 of 337
Yes you can use regular gas by traderj
Aug 06, 2008 (11:29 pm)
Reply
I live next to the largest volume Audi Dealership in North America. I went there yesterday to inquire about the 2009 A4 Avant. I asked about regular gas. They told me that was the most frequently asked question by customers. They have been told by Audi to tell all of their customers that they can use regular gas in all Audi models. You see they don't "require" premiun, they "recommend" premiun to get maximum performance.
What does this mean? This is legalese marketing mumbo jumbo. It allows them to advertise 211hp and 258 torque, in order to top a competitors figures.That's what sells cars, numbers!
Does it affect performance, yes, but so little that you won't be able to tell the difference. You might get 207hp and 252 lbs. torque. Does it affect mileage? Well, the technically yes, but in reality NO! The EPA mileage for the Quatro is supposed to be 21 city and 27 hwy. If indeed you get 27 hwy on premium, you may get 26.95 on regular. So in reality there is no noticeable difference. I just read an article in which the author posed this question to a Porche engineer, and he said it was perfectly fine for any Porche owner to use regular and that he doubted that any Porche customer would notice a difference in either perfomance or mileage. You will see in 2009 that almost alll manufacturers who used to "require" premium, will be changing the language in their manuals to say "recommended" premium for best performance. You see, all engines today have brains which automatically adjust the engine to run on any grade of gasoline. In fact, the Hyundai Genesis is the first car to publish exact figures for both regular and premium gas. Their v-8, which gets 368hp on premium, loses 7 hp with regular and no difference in mileage. I beleive that publishing dual power figures will become the norm in the near future.
So, the bottom line is, if you are drag racing to work everyday or if you don't think Exxon is making enough money, keep buying premium. If not, keep the change for yourself.
#37 of 337
Re: Yes you can use regular gas [traderj] by jd25
Aug 07, 2008 (8:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: traderj (Aug 06, 2008 11:29 pm)

Thanks for the clarification! I'm waiting for the 2009 A4 to come out which I'd prefer to lease. I just hope that by using 87 or regular grade gas won't breach any lease terms...
#38 of 337
Re: Yes you can use regular gas [jd25] by shipo
Aug 07, 2008 (10:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: jd25 (Aug 07, 2008 8:45 am)

While using 87 will not violate any terms of your lease, it is highly doubtful that you'll only lose a quarter of an MPG by running regular fuel (contrary to the highly questionable factoids posted by traderj).
 
Do what you wish with your car, however, most of the scientific studies that I've read regarding the use of Regular fuel in cars designed to run with Premium indicate that you're going lose at least eight percent of your fuel efficiency, which is more than enough to cost justify using Premium fuel.
 
Best Regards,
Shipo
#39 of 337
Re: Yes you can use regular gas [shipo] by jd25
Aug 07, 2008 (10:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Aug 07, 2008 10:05 am)

As I go through Google search on this topic, the consensus seems to be that if the car requires premium then one can get away by using regular about half the times of refilling. If the car recommends (not require) then one can probably get away using regular all the time. It seems according to AAA more than regular vs premium debate it is important to refill with brand name gas such as Chevron's Techron that has added detergent to keep the engine clean from carbon buildup. Following is an article from MSNBC:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25691323/
#40 of 337
Re: Yes you can use regular gas [jd25] by shipo
Aug 07, 2008 (11:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: jd25 (Aug 07, 2008 10:31 am)

That article is simply opinion from a few sources that have no scientific credibility, that and it has more than a few inaccuracies and outright fabrications laced into the dialog.
 
If you want much more accurate and scientifically derived information, go to the SAE archives ( http://www.sae.org ) and poke around a bit.
 
Best Regards,
Shipo

Messages Page 4 of 34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
34
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement