Sign In Join 



2009 Audi A4

337 messages,  Last post on Nov 20, 2009 at 2:22 PM

You are in the Audi A4 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Audi A4, Sedan


Messages Page 24 of 35
1
...
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
...
35
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#224 of 337
Re: 2.0T Turbo lag blues? [richardnva] by rjlaero
Feb 11, 2009 (11:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: richardnva (Feb 06, 2009 6:33 am)

I think anyone who is underwhelmed with the 2.0T is in the minority
 
The new 09 2.0T is quite impressive to me. With nearly 260lb ft of torque, it's no doubt better than most V6's out there. BMW and MB's standard V6's can't match that. Even Audis own 3.2 with 265 hp has 243lb ft of torque. The 2.0T is probably one of the best motors on the market right now.
 
All of that torque is available under 2000 RPM, and you can really feel it around town.
 
I've got an A6 with a 350 hp V8 and love power like anybody else. Every time I get in a 2.0T and slam on the gas, it makes me smile. It's a heck of a lot of fun to drive and has plenty on punch to me.
#225 of 337
Re: 2.0T Turbo lag blues? [rjlaero] by richardnva
Feb 12, 2009 (9:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: rjlaero (Feb 11, 2009 11:49 am)

rjlaero,
I'm a big Audi fan and agree that on paper the specs on the 2.0 seem to match up against other engines, but from a drivability perspective it's hard to compare a small 2 liter to a larger V6. Maybe it would have performed better if I had stomped on it like you referenced. I did normal city and highway driving without really pushing it from a hard stop to see what the raw acceleration would be. For normal city driving it didn't do so well at low speeds (stop and go traffic). It's still a great engine, and arguably my expectations were too high. I miss my A6 and probably need to move up to the 6 to get what I want. I'd still be interested to hear from anyone who has driven both the 2.0 and the 3.2. Thanks.
#226 of 337
by paulee
Feb 12, 2009 (11:33 am)
Reply
I'm confused about the TMV pricing on the Audi autobuilder.
 
The prestige package has a price of $6909 and the navigation has an optional price of $2,326. It is my understanding that the prestige package INCLUDES the navigation system. Is this correct?
 
I was quoted $41,942 for an A4 2.0T quattro (auto) with the prestige package.
Does this seem high or in line with TMV?
#227 of 337
Re: 2.0T Turbo lag blues? [richardnva] by markcincinnati
Feb 14, 2009 (1:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: richardnva (Feb 06, 2009 6:33 am)

From PBS's MotorWeek to Car and Driver to AutoWeek and on and on and on, including Ward's Best Engine of the year (one of the 10 for '09), the current, B8 Audi 2.0T receives praise for:
 
Smoothness
"undetectable" lag
Nearly weapons grade torque
Economy
Emissions
 
It also is reviewed as being the quicker of the two US versions of the A4 quattro, in some tests by OVER 1/2 second. The 3.2 is a great engine, but its main characteristic is it sounds good under part throttle. Both sound good at full cry, but the edge on "sweetness" goes to the 3.2.
 
If you found the 2.0T underpowered, you will not be pleased with the 3.2 between rest and 80+ MPH.
 
I have a theory, based on your post: you drove a front wheel drive version with the CVT transmission, which imparts an entirely different feel. Further, the AWD version uses a very very quick shifting tiptronic and rear wheel drive biased AWD (40/60 f/r torque split.)
 
I tested four recent Audis: S5, A5 3.2, A4 3.2 and A4 2.0T. They are all desirable, based, IMHO, on trim level (I have the Prestige, 19" sport package, Nav+voice+camera, ADS, rear and side sunshades -- everything but ACC and rear airbags, that is). The 2.0T A4 is push you back in the seat quick, somewhat like the awesome S5 (somewhat, I'm not saying alike or even "close").
 
The reason: 258 pound feet of torque available sub 1,900 rpm. The V6 on the other hand, 243 pound feet of torque that comes on north of 3,100. The 2.0T weighs less and the engine at idle whilst you sit at that lonnnnng traffic light makes you wonder "is this thing still running" it is so silent and vibration free.
 
0-100KPH for the 3.2 = 6.7 seconds; 6.2 seconds for the 2.0T -- and a mile or two or three better MPG if that is of interest. Corners better, too, since the 3.2 is a smidge more nose heavy and slower to respond due to the wait to get to the higher RPM's where its max torque comes on.
 
Try a 2.0T Prestige, 19" Sport package (or SLine) equipped '09 A4 quattro. You shouldn't have any issues with THAT configuration.
 
Finally: the A4 itself is the quietest Audi I have ever had: of 29, including an A8, S6, allroad and most recently a 2005 A6 3.2.
 
While I may wish for a bit more torque and perhaps plus 15% more HP, I am here to testify -- the new 2.0T may be Audis best "small engine" yet.
 
It is easily better than my 2.7T and even better than my 1995 S6 20 valve turbo 5 cylinder, which DID have that sweet sound down pat.
 
The 4.2, however, at this point, is the sweetest of all, especially at full cry.
 
Can't wait to test the 3.0T (supercharged S4).
#228 of 337
Re: 2.0T Turbo lag blues? [markcincinnati] by richardnva
Feb 15, 2009 (7:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: markcincinnati (Feb 14, 2009 1:16 pm)

Thanks for the reply. Yes, I do look forward to trying out the 3.2 quattro for comparison to the 2.0. Ironic that you quote the Motorweek review, I just watched their review of the A4 and it was very complementary, and I agree that it is a very nice car. As far as part of your theory about the CVT, I'm sorry to disappoint you that I don't think that was the basis for my comments. My A6 was a CVT as well, and I actually really enjoyed the driving sensation of the smooth pull that the CVT delivered. I'm actually a little surprised that you can still get the CVT anymore, I was beginning to think that Audi was going towards quattro only and getting rid of the 2-wheel drive CVTs. Hopefully I'll have some time in the next week or so to try out the 3.2 for comparison. I'll let you know. Thanks!
#229 of 337
Tiptronic vs S tronic by kmelby
Feb 15, 2009 (8:07 pm)
Reply
Can any of you new owners of the 2009 A4's comment on how you like the new fast shifting Tiptronic? If you have driven a car with S tronic how much difference do you notice between the two transmissions.
#230 of 337
Bogus specs by james27
Feb 16, 2009 (4:04 pm)
Reply
I'm fairly tall and long-waisted. It tweaked my interest when I saw the headroom spec on the new A4 - they say it is 40"...maybe if you could find one without a sunroof (Europe maybe, not here). My car says there's 39.6" and I have at least 2 more inches of headroom than the Audi. Bummer. Personally, I'd prefer a car without a sunroof - quieter, lighter, more room, cheaper. It's just that few luxury car manufacturers care to satisfy that desire.
#231 of 337
Re: 2009 Audi 2.0T Premium Lease [nicnacx2] by new_to_audi
Feb 17, 2009 (11:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nicnacx2 (Feb 02, 2009 10:52 pm)

Sorry I am not answering your question. I am just curious which SoCal Audi dealership you got this good price. $2k below invoice is great. Do you get this good price because you are financing? I am in the market to get an Audi A4 similar to yours too.
 
I believe 2009 A4 is new to US, but not in Europe. Does anyone hear anything about its reliability issue or is it just too early to tell?
 
Please help.
#232 of 337
Re: 2.0T Turbo lag blues? [richardnva] by fglamser
Mar 02, 2009 (4:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: richardnva (Feb 15, 2009 7:57 am)

I have the 2009 2.0 Front Trak model. If you put the transmission in Drive it's a bit sluggish, but has phenomenal fuel economy. If you put the tranny in "S" the car is way quick. You have to be sure you have room in front of you when you step on it.
#233 of 337
09 Audi A4 - SoCal Audi Dealer ?? by tdg1
Mar 06, 2009 (6:11 pm)
Reply
Does anyone have a recommendation for a good SoCal Audi Dealer?? I have tried to work with Keyes and Rusnak and have not been happy with their service or lease deals on the A4. The best I could find so far is Rusnak with the following:
 
'09 A4 2.0, CVT, w/ 18" Sport Pkg, & Heated Seats
MSRP = $33,725
Down = $1250 ($750 Audi Loyalty + $500)
Term = 36 / 10k / .25 cents per mile over
Payment = $450 (inclusive of CA tax)
 
I couldn't get any more information out of them like the money factor or residual...
 
Any comments or recommendations would be greatly appreciated!
 
Thanks.
  

Messages Page 24 of 35
1
...
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
...
35
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement