Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Audi A4 2009 Audi A4
337 messages, Last post on Nov 20, 2009 at 2:22 PM
You are in the Audi A4 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: bandfan (Feb 04, 2009 6:18 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: bandfan (Feb 07, 2009 12:37 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: bandfan (Feb 07, 2009 12:37 pm) And don't get me started on pure automatics... 
|
|
|
|
|
Thoughts on this deal ? this is the deal i just got off the phone with.. wonder if G can help me !! A4 2.0quatrro premium plus 15,000 miles 36 months MSRP= $38,000 INVOICE= $35734 (he told me he was giving it to me for $36,000) told by the dealer the following : MF= .0009 Residual = 50% (saw on another board the MF = .00104 and residual of 49% $575 per month ( i thought if i can get him to $550.. i'd jump) drive off is 1st month, bank (625) and NYS reg (200) Any helps would be much appreciated
|
|
|
Replying to: rbergmandc (Feb 10, 2009 2:31 pm) My co-worker leased a 2008 G35X, no Nav for 385.00. They have so many 2008s they don't show the 2009 G37 sedans. (better tranny & motor) That's a great deal and you will never have a repair. Just hope gas stays low. |
|
|
Replying to: richardnva (Feb 06, 2009 6:33 am) The new 09 2.0T is quite impressive to me. With nearly 260lb ft of torque, it's no doubt better than most V6's out there. BMW and MB's standard V6's can't match that. Even Audis own 3.2 with 265 hp has 243lb ft of torque. The 2.0T is probably one of the best motors on the market right now. All of that torque is available under 2000 RPM, and you can really feel it around town. I've got an A6 with a 350 hp V8 and love power like anybody else. Every time I get in a 2.0T and slam on the gas, it makes me smile. It's a heck of a lot of fun to drive and has plenty on punch to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: rjlaero (Feb 11, 2009 11:49 am) I'm a big Audi fan and agree that on paper the specs on the 2.0 seem to match up against other engines, but from a drivability perspective it's hard to compare a small 2 liter to a larger V6. Maybe it would have performed better if I had stomped on it like you referenced. I did normal city and highway driving without really pushing it from a hard stop to see what the raw acceleration would be. For normal city driving it didn't do so well at low speeds (stop and go traffic). It's still a great engine, and arguably my expectations were too high. I miss my A6 and probably need to move up to the 6 to get what I want. I'd still be interested to hear from anyone who has driven both the 2.0 and the 3.2. Thanks. |
|
|
I'm confused about the TMV pricing on the Audi autobuilder. The prestige package has a price of $6909 and the navigation has an optional price of $2,326. It is my understanding that the prestige package INCLUDES the navigation system. Is this correct? I was quoted $41,942 for an A4 2.0T quattro (auto) with the prestige package. Does this seem high or in line with TMV?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: richardnva (Feb 06, 2009 6:33 am) Smoothness "undetectable" lag Nearly weapons grade torque Economy Emissions It also is reviewed as being the quicker of the two US versions of the A4 quattro, in some tests by OVER 1/2 second. The 3.2 is a great engine, but its main characteristic is it sounds good under part throttle. Both sound good at full cry, but the edge on "sweetness" goes to the 3.2. If you found the 2.0T underpowered, you will not be pleased with the 3.2 between rest and 80+ MPH. I have a theory, based on your post: you drove a front wheel drive version with the CVT transmission, which imparts an entirely different feel. Further, the AWD version uses a very very quick shifting tiptronic and rear wheel drive biased AWD (40/60 f/r torque split.) I tested four recent Audis: S5, A5 3.2, A4 3.2 and A4 2.0T. They are all desirable, based, IMHO, on trim level (I have the Prestige, 19" sport package, Nav+voice+camera, ADS, rear and side sunshades -- everything but ACC and rear airbags, that is). The 2.0T A4 is push you back in the seat quick, somewhat like the awesome S5 (somewhat, I'm not saying alike or even "close"). The reason: 258 pound feet of torque available sub 1,900 rpm. The V6 on the other hand, 243 pound feet of torque that comes on north of 3,100. The 2.0T weighs less and the engine at idle whilst you sit at that lonnnnng traffic light makes you wonder "is this thing still running" it is so silent and vibration free. 0-100KPH for the 3.2 = 6.7 seconds; 6.2 seconds for the 2.0T -- and a mile or two or three better MPG if that is of interest. Corners better, too, since the 3.2 is a smidge more nose heavy and slower to respond due to the wait to get to the higher RPM's where its max torque comes on. Try a 2.0T Prestige, 19" Sport package (or SLine) equipped '09 A4 quattro. You shouldn't have any issues with THAT configuration. Finally: the A4 itself is the quietest Audi I have ever had: of 29, including an A8, S6, allroad and most recently a 2005 A6 3.2. While I may wish for a bit more torque and perhaps plus 15% more HP, I am here to testify -- the new 2.0T may be Audis best "small engine" yet. It is easily better than my 2.7T and even better than my 1995 S6 20 valve turbo 5 cylinder, which DID have that sweet sound down pat. The 4.2, however, at this point, is the sweetest of all, especially at full cry. Can't wait to test the 3.0T (supercharged S4). 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: markcincinnati (Feb 14, 2009 1:16 pm)
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Audi A4
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
