You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Mazda CX-9
Mazda CX-9 Pet Peeves

98 messages, Last post on Sep 13, 2009 at 11:49 AM
You are in the Mazda CX-9 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: betablocker (Dec 20, 2008 11:13 am) You will have the same issue on a Volvo XC-90 and Mercedes S550. The "premium" $2,000 stereo isn't so premium. "Is that subwoofer working"? It blows away my mother in laws Maxima by a long shot. No contest. Beep...beep....beep....beep. Everything has a beep or multiple beeps. Give me a break with these beeps! First, one system that beeps in the BSMS, of which you can turn off (read your owners manual). Second, the car will beep if you leave your car on and exit the car with the Smart Key in hand. Kinda nice, don't you think? Third, buckle your seat belt!!!!! Power rear lift gate only opens if car doors are unlocked? What's up with that? Plus the outside button on the rear door only unlocks the car doors, does not also engage the auto lift gate? Maybe there's a problem with mine only since this doesn't seem right. That's right. By design. Not all people want the lift gate to open automatically by touching the hidden button. Are you that lazy you cant hit the key on your remote? Overall low quality interior materials. Hard-Plasticky dash, cheapo handles, flimsy gear shift, roughly stitched steering wheel, poor quality leather (is it really leather). Compared to what? Your 5 yr old Murano? I think not. I'll be going back to a Volvo XC-90 V8 or Mercedes 550 S Leaving a "blue collar" brand for a luxury one. I hope extra $50,000 for the S550 is worth it. |
|
|
Replying to: betablocker (Jan 06, 2009 7:48 am) I guess Mazda cannot please everyone. Motor Trend (2008 SUV of the Year), Consumer Reports, C & D, R & T, Edmunds.com and the thousands of other owners for the most part all seem to think it's the greatest thing since sliced bread. I have a question for you. WHY DID YOU BUY IT?!?!?!?! Was it because you could not afford the $100,000 S550 or didn't feel like going back to the Volvo dealership who are all too familiar with because your XC-90 would have it's own private service / repair bay?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Jan 06, 2009 1:03 pm) Another thing I noticed, I'm 6' 4" (not exactly a center for the Knicks) and with the seat at its lowest, I have haybe 1" of head clearance. If I hit a bump real hard....bang. And this isn't a small car. The Volvo had at least 3" to spare. Gotta take the baseball cap off when getting in this beauty. In reality, its probably just not for me.
|
|
|
Replying to: betablocker (Jan 07, 2009 9:25 am) It seems you are really used to higher end cars in which you pay for these things that the CX-9 is lacking. For the price you pay for the CX-9, you get a lot of car. It has been documented to have high quality, especially for the class it is in. In reality, its probably just not for me. Not every car will appeal to everyone. To each their own.
|
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Jan 07, 2009 11:19 am) |
|
Another pet peeve I have with the CX-9 is the manual shift which is totally counter-intuitive ~ to down-shift you have to push up instead of pull down! Conventional wisdom says that if you want to slow down, you pull instead of push! Oh, well!
|
|
|
Replying to: my3rdrx (Jan 12, 2009 3:45 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: my3rdrx (Jan 12, 2009 3:45 pm) You see, people have different opinions on this. There is no way to please everyone. |
|
|
1. I have owned a BMW automatic for six years. I find the manual shifting (forward for downshift/back for upshift) to be more intuitive if you've ever driven a stick. I'm used to it, and the Mazdas are the only other cars I've driven that match the BMW, so I love that. From the first time I drove this car, it handled like a poor man's X5 (with a real third row seat). The pulling action reminds me of upshifts to 3rd and 5th. I guess it's whatever you're used to. 2. My Dad always bought cheap Pontiacs and Chevys when I was a kid. My first four cars were two Pontiacs, a Subaru, and a Nissan. All had hinges or gas struts for the hood. If you ask me, a dirty prop rod on a car that starts at $30K is unforgivably cheap. I even pointed it out to the salesman when I test drove the car. 3. Why don't the fog lights come on the mid-level Touring model? Since when are fog lights a high-end luxury feature? 4. During my test drives I also noticed the very washed out Nav screen. The saleman said it was just that particular car. I don't even want/need Nav, but you have to get it to get the power tailgate? What's up with that bundling strategy? 5. I actually like the Bose stereo. It's better than the Bose system in the Murano I test drove, and much better than the Harman Kardan in my BMW. 6. I agree: you really can't compare quality and standard features between a Mazda and a premium brand. A loaded CX-9 is $43K. A similarly equipped X5 will be better built, and a slightly better driver, but will cost you $60K. An MDX will run close to $50K. And,...there won't be any $8,500 discounts on those cars. Overall, this is a great car for the money - especially the out-the-door money - and you can get a low end one that gives you the basic goodness of the chasis and steering for only $31K MSRP if that is what you want. I'm glad Mazda made it. RMP |
|
|
We bought the low end sport because my kids don't like leather. The only extra on it was the driver electric seat. We have only had it two weeks, but so far we love it. For the $22k price we paid I think it is a great car!
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Mazda CX-9
Mazda CX-9 Pet Peeves
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda CX-9



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats