Sign In Join 



Nissan Frontier Real World MPG Numbers

36 messages,  Last post on Aug 07, 2009 at 8:51 PM

You are in the Nissan Frontier Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Nissan Frontier, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Truck


Messages Page 2 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#5 of 36
Re: MPG Real World [moparbad] by jewillm
Jan 18, 2008 (1:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Jan 18, 2008 1:03 pm)

Thank you for the info. I agree with what you say about mopar in the 80's and 90's. I was the Service Director at a Dodge dealership in the early 80's. Not fun! It got me out of the car business. Before that I was a District Service Manager with Nissan USA for 10 years. I'm partial to both. No I'm in the IT business.
Mopar muscle! I had a 56 Dodge with a 315 hemi in it. My brother then got a 57 w/ a 325 (D-500) in it. Both very fast, but the 56 was no match for the 57. Wish I still had that car.
Anyway, I haven't really made up my mind about the truck yet. Toyota has the best resale, but also the most expensive to repair. I have a 94 4Runner that is a POC. 14MPG at best, and grossly underpowered.
Thanks for your input. I appreciate it.
#6 of 36
Re: Fuel economy [jewillm] by brunte
Jan 21, 2008 (10:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: jewillm (Jan 17, 2008 9:24 am)

My -07 Frontier has only 7000 miles. It's a Crew cab, LE, 4x4 with a snug lid over the bed. I drive at legal speeds (well, a few miles above, expecting the spedometer to be a bit "happy") but I don't floor the pedal to get up in speed.
Here's my findings so far; Cross country, 20 mpg in headwinds, 21 in no wind 22-23 in tail wind. When towing (in variable wind) a 5000 lbs trailer i got 17 mpg (but driving only 60 mph due to risk of swaying) - Around town; - 19 mpg (no lead foot) - I believe my MPG will improve slightly at 20-30000 miles
#7 of 36
Re: Fuel economy [brunte] by moparbad
Jan 21, 2008 (10:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: brunte (Jan 21, 2008 10:21 am)

What method are you using to measure your mpg?
In what type of temperatures?
#8 of 36
KEEP your full size by magbarn
Feb 22, 2008 (3:33 am)
Reply
I've got a 07 Nismo Crew 4x4 ad I only get about 16mpg going about 80mph on the interstate. I get maybe about 18mpg if I go only 60-65mph. My new tires, BFG AT, took away another 2mpg as I added 40+lbs rolling resistance to my truck. (Don't believe the hype on these tires, there's better alternatives) Anyways, keep your full-size as the mpg difference really isn't there. If I could do it all over I'd get a 5.3 Silverado and get the same mpg, but much bigger truck. BTW Nismo's have lower gearing so that's another factor. SE & LE's have a taller rear diff ratio so better mpg.
#9 of 36
Re: KEEP your full size [magbarn] by jewillm
Feb 25, 2008 (10:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: magbarn (Feb 22, 2008 3:33 am)

Thank you magbarn. Good info. I bought a new Dodge Ram 1500 Quad Cab 4X4 with the 5.7 litre Hemi. I have had it a few weeks now. First road trip, 273 miles on 13.2 gallons of gas. I think that comes to 20.7 MPG. Around here in the mountains east of Albuquerque, back and forth to work it's getting over 17. I am very happy with that.
#10 of 36
Just passed the 12k mark , mpg report by stringbender
Mar 04, 2008 (8:05 pm)
Reply
I have the LWB 07 SE crew, auto 2 WD. I am still very happy with the truck except a little rattle every once in a while, I know where it is so I just hit the plastic on the dash and it shuts up for a while. My combination city and hwy mpg most of the time run 19mpg and the hwy 21 to 22 so I am happy. It seems like the 4WD trucks get less mpg probably because of the added weight plus the added height creates more wind drag. The truck still rides smooth and the ac and heat and the radio are working great. I get lots of compliments on the truck and most of them center around the track anchoring system in the back, I use it all the time and can hold any kind of cargo in it's place. Sometimes I still get new truck fever again and admire the bigger trucks, but then I go to the forums and find that almost everyone of them seems to have more problems, so my new truck fever goes away and I am content again.
#11 of 36
is 91 Octane really worth paying extra for? by blue3fish
Mar 09, 2008 (8:38 am)
Reply
I just purchased an 08 SE V6 and the owners manual says to put 91 octane or higher for fuel. It also says that if 91 is not available that you can put in 87 or higher. If I use 89 instead of 91 will I see a noticeable difference?
#12 of 36
Re: is 91 Octane really worth paying extra for? [blue3fish] by asa
Mar 18, 2008 (8:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: blue3fish (Mar 09, 2008 8:38 am)

Octane questions often bring responses from all corners. The owner's manual used to read that 87 Octane is fine and that 91 Octane could be used for higher performance, but it seems they edited the wording for some reason. I burn only 87 in my '06 SE CC and it works fine. Others may differ, but paying 10% more for 91 Octane is unlikely to yield a 10% spike in fuel economy. I guess you can try a few tanks and see what happens.
#13 of 36
Re: is 91 Octane really worth paying extra for? [asa] by sapper4x4
Apr 03, 2008 (5:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: asa (Mar 18, 2008 8:42 am)

I own a 2008 Nissan Frontier and get an average mileage of 19 mpg based on what the computer is telling me. I also checked manually and it is pretty accurate. I also did some comparisons on gas prices against BJ's wholesale gas. The cost for gas where I am is 3.16 (reg), 3.37 (mid), and 3.47 (prem) as of 4/3/08. BJ's premium is 3.39. Since the owner's manual suggests using 91 octane, I compared the 3.47 prem vs. 3.39 BJ's prem. I figure it costs me about .42 cents more per 100 miles to use BJ's premium. If I compare the cost of regular gas against the BJ's premium, it comes out to about 1.21 more per 100 miles or 12.10 per 1,000 miles. I think it is worth the extra cost especially since the truck's mileage drops to 17 mpg if I use regular (89) gas. This is not scientific by any means. I am just trying to share my experience.
#14 of 36
Re: is 91 Octane really worth paying extra for? [sapper4x4] by rocketman67
Jun 09, 2008 (8:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: sapper4x4 (Apr 03, 2008 5:13 am)

Good info ya posted sapper 4x4.

Messages Page 2 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement