Sign In Join 



Lincoln MKT

100 messages,  Last post on Feb 11, 2009 at 3:53 PM

You are in the Future Vehicles Forum. Your Host is kirstie_h

What is this discussion about? Lincoln, Concept Cars, Future Vehicle, Sedan


Messages Page 6 of 10
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#51 of 100
Re: MKT Job 1 "spring" 2009 [gregg_vw] by akirby
Mar 18, 2008 (8:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: gregg_vw (Mar 18, 2008 6:15 am)

Still doesn't explain why they needed another year, even though Lincoln was slated to get a Flex job all along.
 
I think they're just out of resources and can't do everything at once, even if they wanted to, at least not in North America. Remember they're launching one significantly updated vehicle (F150) plus 2 all new vehicles this year plus a mid cycle refresh for the CD3s. That's a lot, even with a full staff.
#52 of 100
Re: MKT Job 1 "spring" 2009 [akirby] by jeyhoe
Mar 19, 2008 (1:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Mar 18, 2008 8:09 am)

"That's a lot, even with a full staff"
 
Yeah, and they just announced today they'll be doing ANOTHER layoff. So better get them Lincolns out NOW, else never may come early.
#53 of 100
MK T officially approved by jeyhoe
Mar 20, 2008 (12:05 pm)
Reply
Yep, check BON today and find the news that Ford has aofficially approved the MK T for production. I hope this pleases many folks who've been chomping at the bit for a FWD Lincoln station wagon. Sadly, (he says sarcastically) the news also says that the distinctive 'bustle-back' wont make it to production.
#54 of 100
Re: MK T officially approved [jeyhoe] by gregg_vw
Mar 20, 2008 (12:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jeyhoe (Mar 20, 2008 12:05 pm)

OK, then, I now officially hate the MKT idea too. Like Ford usually does, they will dumb it down to where it is just a Flex with cautious Lincoln styling. Yes, that will really stand out in the marketplace.
#55 of 100
Re: MK T officially approved [jeyhoe] by akirby
Mar 21, 2008 (6:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: jeyhoe (Mar 20, 2008 12:05 pm)

the news also says that the distinctive 'bustle-back' wont make it to production
 
Unless you're talking about a different article from the one I saw at detnews.com - it doesn't say that at all. It just says that the production version will offer seating for 7 and I think that's still possible even with the 'bustle-back' design. It's also possible they'll offer 2 versions - one with a 3rd row and one without.
 
I'm also not saying that it won't change - it might and if it does then your criticism is spot on. But given Mulally's position on past concepts I'd be very surprised if the basic design gets altered for production.
#56 of 100
Re: MK T officially approved [akirby] by jeyhoe
Mar 21, 2008 (7:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Mar 21, 2008 6:05 am)

I read all the posts on BON and that's probably where I read the bustle-back was gone. SOme on there are insiders. We'll see.
Yeah, there's talk of a 2 row and a 3 row version. Myself I doubt that. Would cost them too much to build 2 versions. When's the last time Ford built 2 versions of anything, save Mustang?
#57 of 100
Re: MK T officially approved [jeyhoe] by gregg_vw
Mar 21, 2008 (8:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: jeyhoe (Mar 21, 2008 7:41 am)

Not two versions. Option for two rows or three rows, like with the Explorer, etc.
#58 of 100
Re: MK T officially approved [jeyhoe] by akirby
Mar 21, 2008 (8:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: jeyhoe (Mar 21, 2008 7:41 am)

When's the last time Ford built 2 versions of anything
 
Taurus/Taurus X?
 
I read those forums and I don't remember anything but speculation, but I could be wrong. I'm not a big fan of that look but it is distinctive.
 
I'd like to think there is enough room (the concept is longer than the Flex) for a 3rd row without changing the rear too much. Then I'd like to see a 3 row option and a 2 row option with captain's chairs and extra leg room. That would make a nice livery vehicle since most only carry one or two passengers plus you have tons of luggage space - much better than a TC or CV.
#59 of 100
Re: MK T officially approved [gregg_vw] by jeyhoe
Mar 21, 2008 (8:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: gregg_vw (Mar 21, 2008 8:22 am)

Well, the talk I heard was a fancy 2 row version with seat tracks for the 2nd row and reclining seats etc. That would require a lot more engineering than just a 3rd row option.
 
allen: Taurus/Taurus X ?? HAHA What was that 60's song? "The Name Game"
#60 of 100
Re: MK T officially approved [jeyhoe] by akirby
Mar 21, 2008 (12:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jeyhoe (Mar 21, 2008 8:41 am)

The concept IS a 2 seater with reclining seats and there is a possibility they'll offer that configuration as a production luxury livery vehicle. It would certainly be more comfortable and hold more cargo and luggage than a comparable Town Car or other limo. The question is whether the 7 passenger version will keep the same rear design as the 4 passenger.
 
And if Ford can do 3 versions of a vehicle (Taurus/Sable/Taurus X) on one platform there's no reason they can't do 3 with the Flex platform (Flex, MKT 4 and MKT 7).

Messages Page 6 of 10
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement