Sign In Join 



2009 CTS

234 messages,  Last post on Dec 08, 2009 at 10:37 PM

You are in the Cadillac CTS/CTS-V Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Cadillac CTS, Cadillac CTS-V, Sedan


Messages Page 14 of 24
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
24
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#127 of 234
Re: Gas Mileage [artmbgolf] by blackcadillac
Feb 23, 2009 (7:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: artmbgolf (Feb 23, 2009 10:32 am)

Thanks for the tip on the MPG test.
 
Here are the specifics on my CTS
 
3.6L Direct Injection All-Wheel Drive V6 engine with 304 hp
Transmission, 6-speed automatic transmission.
Performance Collection, 18" All-Season Tire Performance Package
  
Yes, the 263HP RWD felt more responsive.
 
I will try the highway 60 MPH test and see if I get the 25-26 EPA.
 
thx,
 
-s
#128 of 234
Re: Gas Mileage [blackcadillac] by artmbgolf
Feb 23, 2009 (8:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: blackcadillac (Feb 23, 2009 7:57 pm)

I had a 2004 CTS with the 263HP, auto, Goodyear RS-A and got 27mpg highway. I now have a 2007 CTS 263hp, with FE3 18" Summer Tire Potenza, with Limited Slip. I get 25 mpg highway. The reduction could be the tires or limited slip or just engine variance.
 
Some reporting normal 27ish mpg and others reporting teens, makes it sound like they have a problem or are calculating wrong or just reporting the computer avg mpg. My current 25 mpg highway often is around 15-17 around town.
 
If cruise or steady at 60-70 mph on flat road isn't up in the mid 20's, you might have a problem, especially considering performance doesn't feel good compared to the 263hp engine.
  
I have not driven the DI yet, so I can't talk about the difference in feel. I also wonder if the Michlen tires on FE2 grip well enough, as they are more of a touring tire than a perf all season.
#129 of 234
Re: 2009 CTS poor mpg [pao] by blackcadillac
Feb 23, 2009 (8:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pao (Feb 23, 2009 9:57 am)

Thanks for the reply.
 
I'd be super happy with 23-24,.....
I'd be happy with 15/16, but 11.6 consistent seems way off.
 
I have 1400 miles on my CTS(AWD DI 304). Do you think I'll get better MPG as I put on more miles?
 
Thx,
- S
#130 of 234
Re: 2009 CTS poor mpg [blackcadillac] by artmbgolf
Feb 23, 2009 (9:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: blackcadillac (Feb 23, 2009 8:25 pm)

Both of my 2004 + 2007 CTS did improve highway MPG by about 2 MPG after
about 5,000 miles. I don't see any way for merely breaking in to increase around 10 mpg.
 
If your commute has lights and stop and go, the avg mpg means very little.
The highway run on instant means more right now and may be your best way to convince your service there is a problem. The sluggish running also sounds like a sign something is wrong.
 
I am not a mechanic. I just observe my Cadillacs using the instant mpg and only monitor average for longer highway trips. I have had several Eldorados with the 300hp Northstar, that all could get 25mpg highway at long distance or using the
instant mpg monitor at highway speeds.
 
A long shot wild guess is to check your oil level, in case they forgot to fill it up, although if seriously low, the car should warn you. Also make sure the tires are inflated where they should be.
#131 of 234
Re: 2009 CTS poor mpg [blackcadillac] by ctsguy2
Feb 24, 2009 (7:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: blackcadillac (Feb 23, 2009 8:38 am)

Hey "S" Your car and mine sound identically optioned, and I too have questions regarding the gas mileage and sputtering of the engine. Mine also has an idle "flutter" when in or out of gear that will actually cause the car to rock. The dealer of course says that nothing shows up on the diagnostics and that they can't duplicate the same conditions. I'm hoping that the mileage will increase in time as I only have 3400 miles, but the stutter and idle issues are still a concern.
#132 of 234
Re: 2009 CTS poor mpg [ctsguy2] by blackcadillac
Feb 24, 2009 (8:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: ctsguy2 (Feb 24, 2009 7:51 am)

Wow, I don't know if it's good or bad to hear you're having the same problems.
I also notice the idle flutter.
 
Are you getting 11/12 MPG?
 
My dealer also gave me a all OK, based on diagnostic computer hook up when I first brought it in.
 
Thx,
-s
#133 of 234
by ctsguy2
Feb 24, 2009 (9:02 am)
Reply
No offense, but I was kind happy to hear that someone else was having the same issues and concerns. Comfort in numbers I guess. I haven't checked my mileage in the past few weeks, but on a 500 mile highway trip I got an average of 20.5 and a mixed loop of 15. I calculate my own averages as I don't know how accurate the "DIC" really is.
#134 of 234
Re: [ctsguy2] by srushing
Feb 24, 2009 (10:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: ctsguy2 (Feb 24, 2009 9:02 am)

Everything I've read suggests you can't rely on the onboard calculations. I have a 2009 Black CTS base engine but have avoided doing any mileage calculations until I hit 7500-10000 miles, which is when I hear engines usually get broken in. So for now, I just enjoy the ride, though I have developed a little rattle in the passengers side seat belt column that I'll have the dealership look at. Otherwise, ok so far.
 
Good luck guys.
#135 of 234
Re: 2009 CTS Poor MPG by artmbgolf
Feb 24, 2009 (11:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: blackcadillac (Feb 23, 2009 8:25 pm)

Motor Trend Feb 2009 has a long term test update on their 08 CTS. No doubt it has the DI engine, but it does not say. They reported no problems and a 13,992 mile avg MPG of 17.2
 
I feel if the combined is 17.2, then their highway could be around 25, which matches up with the EPA estimate.
 
Assuming you guys with sputtering have a problem, it might not be something that reports a code, if all your service guys are doing to checking for an error code. You might have something wrong like a bad spark plug.
#136 of 234
Re: 2009 CTS Poor MPG [artmbgolf] by redgtconv1
Feb 24, 2009 (10:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: artmbgolf (Feb 24, 2009 11:48 am)

I had a 2004 CTS and a 2006 STS, both with the 3.6L V6 and thought both performed well and had good gas mileage. In October, when I went shopping for a 2009 CTS I thought I would step up to the new 3.6DI. The dealer actually gave me the the car to take home for a 24 hour test drive. I immediately noticed 2 things. First the power increase was noticeable and almost more than necessary. But, secondly, I noticed a pronounced vibration which was very noticeable when the car was stopped at a light. You could feel it in the steering wheel, the brake pedal and even the seat, and you could hear it. I looked at the rpm's to see if I could notice why the car engine seemed to be so rough. But the rpm's looked normal. My wife could even feel this roughness in the passenger seat. But, I still thought this would simply require a minor adjustment, so I returned to the dealer with the intention of buying the car. When I was there, I spoke with the general manager about my impressions of the car and mentioned the engine roughness. And, to my surprise his reply was " Yes I know all about that, I drive one myself and it does the same thing. We can't do anything about it, it's just a characteristic of that engine".
So I left the car there and decided I would investigate this. I went on the internet and read every review I could find. Eventually I found 2 professional reviewers who loved the power of the DI but warned about roughness at idle and slow speeds. Please don't ask me for the reviews, it was 4 months ago and I don't remember.
Ok, so no DI engine for me! I then test drove the old reliable non DI engine and loved it. The power was more than adequate and the refinement was far superior.
As far as mileage goes, my history with Cadillac and the 3.6 V6, has taught me that initial mileage stinks, the mileage on my 2006 STS was still improving at 2 years and 25,0000 miles when I turned it back into the dealer.
My 2009 base CTS got about 10mpg in mostly city on the first tank. The first time I took it on the highway I couldn't get it above 24 mpg. At about 1000 miles I was able to get 26-28 mpg on highway. Now at 2000 miles, I just took a 20 mile trip on I-95 at about 65-70 mph and got 29.5 mpg. Now the city mileage is nothing to write home about, maybe 15 mpg. If you look at the Instant Mileage reading you will see it plummet when you accelerate. So a steady foot will dramatically increase mileage.
Sorry for such a long post, but other things to consider are the weight of the vehicle and the conditions you drive in. AWD adds about 200 lbs, sunroof adds 125lbs. additional options add more weight. I have the base car, doesn't even have the spare tire. Also, I live in South Florida, where the roads are flat, we are at sea level and the weather is always nice.

Messages Page 14 of 24
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
24
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement