Sign In Join 



2009 Acura RL

138 messages,  Last post on May 14, 2009 at 12:42 PM

You are in the Acura RL Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Acura RL, Future Vehicle, Sedan


Messages Page 8 of 14
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#68 of 138
Re: website updated [vavavavolvo] by kurtkbee
Jul 01, 2008 (10:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: vavavavolvo (Jun 30, 2008 6:10 pm)

Good to hear, will check the website for the new ad.
I wonder if anyone knows if they improved on the very low mileage that this sedan had or improved the styling for 09'. It looked so much like the accord (just longer).
#69 of 138
Re: website updated [kurtkbee] by nebraskaguy
Jul 01, 2008 (12:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kurtkbee (Jul 01, 2008 10:14 am)

I wonder if anyone knows if they improved on the very low mileage that this sedan had or improved the styling for 09'. It looked so much like the accord (just longer).
 
The listed mileage is slightly less than the 08 model. However, I've always gotten better highway mileage than the listed mileage. I recently took an 8,000 mile trip and got a low of 25 mpg and a high of 30 mpg.
 
The styling hasn't been changed much except for the grill and a little in the trunk. For those of us who never thought it looked much like an Accord, it still doesn't. Those of you who thought it looked like an Accord will probably not change your mind.
#70 of 138
Re: website updated [nebraskaguy] by billyperks2
Jul 02, 2008 (8:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: nebraskaguy (Jul 01, 2008 12:10 pm)

Why only five gears for this class?
I like the refresh look but come on, in this day and age, five gears will not cut it for this segment.
I will compare with the new TL pocket is leading towards the GS350.
#71 of 138
Re: 09 RL Specs [nebraskaguy] by docrw
Jul 02, 2008 (10:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: nebraskaguy (Jun 30, 2008 5:03 pm)

Unfortunately, despite the slight extra length, there is no more legroom in either the front or back seats. Sorry.
 
That's very disappointing. All of the previews stated that that was an area that they were going to address. I read yesterday that they redesigned the seatbacks of the front seats to provide more leg room. Unless they went with carbon fiber seats, I don't see how that could make any significant difference.
 
If the new TL is based on the Accord, then it seems like it would have more rearseat room than the RL. How will Acura reconcile that with customers?
#72 of 138
Is the RL Just an Over-the-Top Accord? by kenb757
Jul 08, 2008 (12:22 pm)
Reply
How much would an RL buyer be willing to spend beyond a top-line Accord? They're built on the same platform with an identical wheelbase, but the RL is AWD. Have you noticed the horrendous gas mileage figures for the Acura V-6 vs. Honda's V-6? Also the RL requires premium fuel.
#73 of 138
by kennyg8
Jul 08, 2008 (6:25 pm)
Reply
"Have you noticed the horrendous gas mileage figures for the Acura V-6 vs. Honda's V-6?"
 
In the case of TL's V-6, the difference is not significant, particularly if you compare hwy mileage. I frequently get 29-32 mpg when cruising at 65-75 mph on the hwy when driving the TL. With respect to the RL, the mpg is around 25-27. Not too bad for a car weighing close to 4k pounds.
#74 of 138
Re: [kennyg8] by kenb757
Jul 09, 2008 (7:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: kennyg8 (Jul 08, 2008 6:25 pm)

The 2009 RL brochure lists 16 city and 22 hwy with premium fuel. My DTS lists 15 and 23 with a 4.6 V-8 on regular fuel and I get around 20 combined.
#75 of 138
Re: [kenb757] by kennyg8
Jul 10, 2008 (2:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kenb757 (Jul 09, 2008 7:23 am)

You need to take into consideration how a car is driven. If you have a lead foot, your mpg will suffer. If you cruise btn 55-65, you have optimum mpg.
 
For reference, see this link about real world RL mpg:kamdog, "Acura RL Real World Fuel Economy" #1, 28 Mar 2007 12:24 pm. The 09 RL has a bigger engine, and is supposedly tuned for quicker pick up and acceleration. Thus, mpg is likely worse than 05-08 models.
#76 of 138
Re: Is the RL Just an Over-the-Top Accord? [kenb757] by kurtkbee
Jul 11, 2008 (7:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: kenb757 (Jul 08, 2008 12:22 pm)

I agree, there are very similar styling lines in the RL and the Accord and for me the RL really does not stand out in its class (A6,BMW5,M45 and E-Class).
 
Combined with the requirement to use premium fuel, its poor fuel efficiency and the styling, i doubt that anyone looking at other members of its class will get the RL (and you should even look at the Jaguar XF which is $49K and 18/26MPG).
 
I always loved Acura but i think that i may skip this generation. But you do get more amenities/options for less that the other brands (but do you really need them)
#77 of 138
Re: Is the RL Just an Over-the-Top Accord? [kurtkbee] by nebraskaguy
Jul 12, 2008 (6:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: kurtkbee (Jul 11, 2008 7:28 am)

But you do get more amenities/options for less that the other brands (but do you really need them)
 
What does "need" really have to do with any car in this category? Can any of us really say we need the things luxury cars offer?

Messages Page 8 of 14
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement