Ask the Car People.SM


Toyota Landcruiser vs. Acura MDX Sport Package with rear DVD system

6 messages,  Last post on Oct 06, 2008 at 7:42 AM

You are in the Toyota Land Cruiser Forum.

What is this discussion about? Toyota Land Cruiser, Acura MDX, SUV

Messages Page 1 of 1

  • All Messages Displayed

#1 of 6 Toyota Landcruiser vs. Acura MDX Sport Package with rear DVD system by tpulak

Dec 27, 2007 (8:21 am)

Though it might not sound like an even competition, it actually is. The Toyota Landcruiser starts at $56,215, while a base MDX goes for about $40,000(base retail prices). That why I loade the MDX with the sport package, and the rear DVD system. But the Land cruiser still has the higher price, at $47,795 for the Acura. The Land cruiser makes only 265 horsepower from the 4.7 liter V-8, while the MDX has 300 horsepower from a 3.7 liter V-8. Also, Toyota's fuel economy are down, 13/17, versus MDX's 17/22. Which one is the better Luxury SUV?

#2 of 6 Re: Toyota Landcruiser vs. Acura MDX Sport Package with rear DVD system [tpulak] by bgsntth

Dec 27, 2007 (9:50 am)

Replying to: tpulak (Dec 27, 2007 8:21 am)
I do not think they are that comparable. The LC does not have the interior room and space efficiency of the MDX, as it leans more toward a purpose-built truck. That is, a ladder frame, solid-rear axle, transfer-case with low-range, and heavy duty everything for towing and off-road abuse. All of this adds weight and reduces gas mileage. So unless you are going to tow large loads, utilize the low-range, or just like trucks-and are willing to sacrifice practicality for image/solid-truck drive; then you are better off with the MDX.
 
The third-row in the LC, and LX and GX, are really not that practical for daily use; especially anyone over 5 feet tall.

#3 of 6 Re: Toyota Landcruiser vs. Acura MDX Sport Package with rear DVD system [b by nedzel

Dec 28, 2007 (10:59 am)

Replying to: bgsntth (Dec 27, 2007 9:50 am)
They are completely different vehicles. The LandCruiser is a true off-road vehicle. It is body-on-frame construction with a solid rear axle, full-time 4WD and a low range.
 
The MDX is a jacked-up minivan. Fine for going to the mall on a snowy day, but not something to take on a challenging trail.
 
Pick which one is suitable for you. Most folks will seldom need the LandCruiser's off-road prowess.

#4 of 6 Re: Toyota Landcruiser vs. Acura MDX Sport Package with rear DVD system [t by mercara

Jan 16, 2008 (6:56 am)

Replying to: tpulak (Dec 27, 2007 8:21 am)
If you don't care about towing capacity and off-road ability, then get the MDX otherwise get the land cruiser.

#5 of 6 Re: Toyota Landcruiser vs. Acura MDX Sport Package with rear DVD system [tpulak] by ct005ke002

Oct 05, 2008 (7:34 am)

Replying to: tpulak (Dec 27, 2007 8:21 am)
Honda and Acura never produce V8 motors. At least not for a long time
 
In terms of company size, Honda is about 1/3 of Toyota. It takes a lot of effort and cost to make V8 motors well and profitable , especially in today's economy.
 
Acura RDX is a V6. High compression V6 to generate 300 Horses.
 
I have 2 Land Cruisers 1998 and 2003 and I love both of them. 100% Made in Japan.
 
Never driven a MDX and not sure where it is made from. I bet Canada or Ohio.

#6 of 6 Re: Toyota Landcruiser vs. Acura MDX Sport Package with rear DVD system [ct005ke002] by JBaumgart

Oct 06, 2008 (7:42 am)

Replying to: ct005ke002 (Oct 05, 2008 7:34 am)
"Acura RDX is a V6. High compression V6 to generate 300 Horses."
 
I believe you meant to say MDX is a V6 with 300HP. The RDX is a turbo 4.

Messages Page 1 of 1

  • All Messages Displayed
To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement