Sign In Join 

2009 Subaru Forester

3669 messages,  Last post on Dec 09, 2009 at 9:48 AM

You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Future Vehicle, Wagon


Messages Page 361 of 368
1
...
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
...
368
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3598 of 3669
Re: Running on the beach [billwv] by ateixeira
Oct 23, 2009 (6:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: billwv (Oct 21, 2009 6:22 pm)

We haven't had enough snow to really challenge our Forester.
 
They say this year we'll have more snow here in the DC area, if so we'll see.
 
My Miata has summer tires so it's absolutely out of the question in bad weather. Our van in FWD and the stability control is too intrusive, though it's better when you turn it "off".
 
Still, the Forester will do all the snow duty, no question.
#3599 of 3669
AT vs MT by ecotrklvr
Oct 23, 2009 (11:02 pm)
Reply
OK, so I'm undecided, and I'm asking for your help. Driven stick all my life, but last two vehicles have been automatics because the Highlander doesn't come in stick. Honda dropped the manual trans option from the CR-V and Toyota did the same on the RAV-4. Which leaves me shopping for a Subaru Forester.
 
I've driven 2010 Forester XT Premium in both Auto and Manual. The manual was nice, and the Auto was very good for an auto. In Manual-mode, it even seems to rev-match on a downshift going into a corner. But these were both 3 mile test drives at best.
 
So what do y'all think? Also, anyone have the quick-shifter installed? A review of the before/after experience would be most welcome.
 
Thanks in advance.
#3600 of 3669
Re: AT vs MT [ecotrklvr] by samiam_68
Oct 24, 2009 (8:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: ecotrklvr (Oct 23, 2009 11:02 pm)

I don't think Forester XT comes with a manual. Do you mean Forester X premium?
#3601 of 3669
Re: AT vs MT [samiam_68] by kurtamaxxxguy
Oct 24, 2009 (10:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: samiam_68 (Oct 24, 2009 8:45 am)

Since 2009, the Forester XT is 4 spd AT only. It offers a sport shift mode improves responsiveness at expense of mileage.
 
It's a decent 4 spd auto and works well with its cruise control, but over 75 the engine's spinning close to 3000 rpm.
#3602 of 3669
Re: AT vs MT [kurtamaxxxguy] by oregonboy
Oct 24, 2009 (10:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (Oct 24, 2009 10:46 am)

With the torque available from the turbo engine, the top-gear ratio seems unnecessarily short, especially for an automatic, where a kick-down is just a toe nudge away. I would think that 2500 or even 2200 RPM would be plenty at 75 MPH.
 
I'm still bummed that the XT is no longer available in the USA with a stick.
#3603 of 3669
Re: AT vs MT [oregonboy] by samiam_68
Oct 24, 2009 (12:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: oregonboy (Oct 24, 2009 10:56 am)

The Forester is LONG overdue for either a 5 speed auto or a CVT. 2011 or 2012 models will probably finally get one of these transmissions.
#3604 of 3669
Re: AT vs MT [samiam_68] by kurtamaxxxguy
Oct 24, 2009 (12:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: samiam_68 (Oct 24, 2009 12:12 pm)

Unfortunately, the current 5 spd AT used in H6 models is not made by Subaru and is in limited supply, hence its limited usage by Subaru.
 
Subaru has stated they plan to move the CVT into more vehicles, with the Forester being a likely choice for 2012 model year.
 
Whether the CVT will become robust enough to replace the 4spd AT in the XT models, or H6 Legacy/Outback models, remains to be seen.
#3605 of 3669
Re: AT vs MT [samiam_68] by ecotrklvr
Oct 24, 2009 (4:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: samiam_68 (Oct 24, 2009 8:45 am)

Yup, sure did mean X Premium. That's what I get for putting up a post after midnight.
 
So, with the non-turbo model, same question - Manual or Auto?
#3606 of 3669
Re: AT vs MT [ecotrklvr] by billwv
Oct 24, 2009 (6:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ecotrklvr (Oct 24, 2009 4:32 pm)

Its all a matter of personal choice...
 
I have the 4AT and am happy with it. I use the manual mode going down hills for engine braking, which works well -- I live in WV.
 
But, the manual mode is no substitute for a stick shift if that is your thinking.
 
Bill
#3607 of 3669
Re: AT vs MT [ecotrklvr] by xwesx
Oct 26, 2009 (8:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: ecotrklvr (Oct 24, 2009 4:32 pm)

When you stated "quick-shifter," did you mean the short-throw shifter?

Messages Page 361 of 368
1
...
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
...
368
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement