Sign In Join 



2009 Subaru Forester

3657 messages,  Last post on Nov 26, 2009 at 8:32 PM

You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Future Vehicle, Wagon


Messages Page 346 of 366
1
...
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
...
366
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3447 of 3657
Re: 2009 Forester reliability in CR- why just average? [pgb0517] by ateixeira
Jul 29, 2009 (12:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pgb0517 (Jul 16, 2009 8:55 pm)

To be fair, though, the average new car sells for $28 grand nowadays and most Foresters fall well below that amount. You pretty much have to get a loaded turbo to spend more than that.
 
So in that manner we are paying a below average (cheap?) price for it.
 
I agree, though, that as fuel economy is emphasized more and more there is a risk of less insulation or simply cheaper materials to accomplish cost and weight targets.
 
Look at the headliner, then compare to a 2006 Forester. It's gone way downhill.
 
Having said that, I'm one of the lucky ones with a rattle-free 2009.
 
Sam - thanks for the correction on the EPA fuel economy estimates.
#3448 of 3657
Stock stereo L.L. Bean Edition 2009 Forester by rich28
Jul 31, 2009 (6:31 pm)
Reply
I just replaced the stock speakers (including tweeters) with JL C2 650x component in the front and coax in the rear. Also had dynamat installed on 1/2 the door in all 4 doors and around the speakers. Auto Sound of Willoughby also secured stock wires and loose parts in the doors that were causing rattles/vibrations. I'm SO glad I did not replace the head unit because the stereo sounds awesome now, even in surround sound, which sounded terrible before. The doors also feel more solid when they are closed. Crutchfield says these speakers are not compatible with the stock stereo, not sure why, but they sure sound good with the 6-CD circle surround stereo! I also had my Sirius Sportster radio hard-wired for power and connected to the aux jack in the center console and it sounds MUCH better than FM transmission, plus it's much cheaper than buying the Sirius module for the car. Hope this helps someone else that can't stand the stock stereo and door vibrations.
#3449 of 3657
Re: Stock stereo L.L. Bean Edition 2009 Forester [rich28] by ateixeira
Aug 03, 2009 (11:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: rich28 (Jul 31, 2009 6:31 pm)

What was your budget for the upgrade?
 
I upgraded the speakers on my 98 Forester and also noticed a significant improvement.
#3450 of 3657
Re: Stock stereo L.L. Bean Edition 2009 Forester [ateixeira] by rich28
Aug 03, 2009 (4:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Aug 03, 2009 11:03 am)

Did not have a budget, but I didn't want to buy a new head unit, amp or sub if I didn't have to. Even though the bass is better than expected, I might add a sub and amp in the future to complete the system.
#3451 of 3657
Re: Stock stereo L.L. Bean Edition 2009 Forester [rich28] by ateixeira
Aug 04, 2009 (6:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: rich28 (Aug 03, 2009 4:55 pm)

What did the stuff you purchased cost you? Sounds like it was worth the price for the improvement.
#3452 of 3657
Forester Feedback - Major Road Trip by bikerguy3
Aug 06, 2009 (1:40 pm)
Reply
Just completed my first major road trip with my 09 Forester X Premium 5MT. I drove
just over 3,000 miles in 22 days - thruought Oregon, Utah, Nevada, & Arizona.
Observations:
 
1. Achieved GREAT gas mileage - 31.2 mpg overall for trip (which was almost all hwy driving). I tend to drive conservatively (65-70 mph, coast on long downhills, etc).
 
2. Forester handles really well on open road, and I found I could drive for hours without being fatigued. The drivers seat has inadequate lumbar support (for me), but
an aux pillow placed behind lower back kept me comfortable. Car had plenty of
power to handle big mountain grades.
 
3. Had an "incident" - a rock (kicked up from truck) chipped the windshield, which necesitated a $40 "chip repair" in Utah. Based on my experience (2nd chip)
and other posts here, I think the Forester uses very thin glass which chips easily.
 
4. Despite driving thru the desert in 115+ deg F temps, had no overheating issues
(not having a temp guage kept me nervous, however!). And A/C proved more than
adequate keeping interior cool and comfortable.
 
5. The black plastic rear wheel well molding came loose again (already fixed by
dealer 3 times previously). Apparently the adhesive strips used by Subaru to attach
these moldings are having problems in extreme heat...
 
6. Here's an interesting lesson I learned: I wanted to charge my cell phone while car was parked at hotel. But power outlets are active only with ignition turned on.
So, I decided I would leave key in ignition, and take door FOB with me
to unlock doors later after phone was charged up. BUT - Forester won't let you lock doors with key in ignition. Then I noticed if you hold down door lock key for 3 seconds, it overrides and lets you lock doors with key in ignition. Unfortunately, this also "deadlocks" the car and you can no longer unlock doors using key FOB - which I learned upon returning to my car and finding myself locked out!!! The good news is that I called the Subaru Assistance phone#, and within 40 minutes they
had a local road service provider on-site to unlock my car (and for no $ charge).
It's nice to know the Subaru Assistance service really does a good job helping you
out if/when you need it.
 
Overall, I really enjoyed how the Forester performed. It had lots of room for camping
gear, bicycle, etc. The huge sunroof was great to have in the mountains. I got as much as 450 miles cruising range on tank of gas. Chalk me up as a VERY
satisfied Subaru owner...
#3453 of 3657
Re: Forester Feedback - Major Road Trip [bikerguy3] by johnv STAFF
Aug 06, 2009 (2:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bikerguy3 (Aug 06, 2009 1:40 pm)

Yikes! Thanks for posting #6 -- I've been tempted to do such things!
#3454 of 3657
One year Update on 2009 Forester by xira
Aug 06, 2009 (4:15 pm)
Reply
Just finished one year with my '09 XT, have 13,000 miles on the car, and thought I'd check in with my comments.
 
Nothing has gone wrong with the car-- I'm very pleased about that! At this point, it is working as well as my Toyota Sienna did. No mechanical problems, nothing has broken. I love the way it handles and rides, the exterior visibility, the power, the tight turning circle, the easy rear-seat access, the big cargo space.
 
If I could redesign it for next year, I would improve the interior (especially the carpeting) and make the seats more cushy -- I added a memory-foam pad and custom sheepskin seat covers on both front seats. (The excellent performance of the car is not matched by the chintzy interior.) I would make the gas tank a little higher-capacity. And I would lower the volume of the annoying seatbelt chime.
 
Other than that, I can say I am quite pleased with my purchase. The car has been really fun to drive, and grips my steep driveway nicely in bad weather. I was at first reluctant to leave my favorite carmakers (Toyota and Honda), but the Forester lured me away because of its superior ride and handling. (The Rav-4 rode like a go-cart and the interior cargo area of the CRV was too small because the rear seats tumble into the footwell.) The Forester has been a very good choice so far.
#3455 of 3657
Re: One year Update on 2009 Forester [xira] by occking
Aug 06, 2009 (8:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: xira (Aug 06, 2009 4:15 pm)

I don't know how you can squeeze that kind of mpg of of a Forster. I have had my 09 will be 5 months in another week and have 13,500 miles on it. Just completed two long trips last two weeks, one from Providence, RI to Halifax, NS than back thru New Brunswick than home, and just todam came back from another three day trip, 1000 miles almost exactly to several locations in Quebec.
 
I rarely drive over 70 mpg, and certainly notice the dip in mpg for anything over 60 - 65. The absolute most I have been able to squeeze iw 449 miles, with approx 1/2 gallon left to spare. That's actual mpg, not based on what the computer says. For highway driving, I would not thing the standard you have would easily give 3 more mpg. But, if you figures are accurate that the 31.2 you indicate is based on the entire trip per actual fuel consumption, that'g great.
 
The car is getting more "noisy" as time goes on Just a lot of noises of various types, nothing I can pinpoint. The carpeting (if you really want to call it that) is lousy. I purchased a wind deflector for the moonroof which has made things much quieter as I like to travel this time of year with roof open, and I talk on the phone constantly and that does cut down on the wind noise considerably. Only problem the wind deflector Subaru provides is rather large, much taller than really is necessary. But, it does the job. The radio is "so so" You cannot get a great deal of volume out the rear speakers, though. Lastly, my left thigh keeps hitting the part of the door on the inside that sticks into the car a bit. Kind of annoying, I never had that problem with another car.
#3456 of 3657
Re: Forester Feedback - Major Road Trip [bikerguy3] by ateixeira
Aug 07, 2009 (7:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: bikerguy3 (Aug 06, 2009 1:40 pm)

Cool trip, amazing MPG. Did Subaru sneak a one-off hybrid drivetrain in yours?
 
I have a Forester and Sienna also - great partners in crime.

Messages Page 346 of 366
1
...
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
...
366
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement