Sign In Join 



2009 Subaru Forester

3640 messages,  Last post on Nov 19, 2009 at 3:06 PM

You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Future Vehicle, Wagon


Messages Page 119 of 365
1
...
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
...
365
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1179 of 3640
Re: Just test drove... [ateixeira] by kurtamaxxxguy
May 07, 2008 (11:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (May 07, 2008 10:25 am)

But in Los Angeles CA , people don't __want__ vision! They want gun slit windows tinted almost opaque! That way they're "invisible" and can drive like crazy - until they pile into someone else !!
  
And (perhaps ), big vehicle sales, along with gansta specials, are doin' fine down there.
 
Seriously, good visibility is great to have (if nothing else, to help avoid the "fools") and the '09 Forester stacks up very well there.
#1180 of 3640
Re: Just test drove... [kurtamaxxxguy] by ateixeira
May 07, 2008 (12:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (May 07, 2008 11:43 am)

It's brilliant, though, if you think about it.
 
You build a car with terrible visibility to the rear, then market a $2000 Navigation system with a backup cam! Win-Win!
 
Subaru was guilty, too, on the original Tribeca. It's much better now.
#1181 of 3640
Re: Just test drove... [ateixeira] by bbthomas
May 07, 2008 (5:41 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (May 07, 2008 10:25 am)

I agree with the review having test drove the 09 a few weeks ago. I think it's the best overall package, but they missed a few details. I'll probably end up getting an LL Bean/Limited once they become more plentyful.
#1182 of 3640
Forester video by rsholland
May 08, 2008 (4:11 am)
Reply
http://allworldcars.com/wordpress/?p=4175
#1183 of 3640
Award for the 2.5 turbo by kurtamaxxxguy
May 08, 2008 (6:12 am)
Reply
referred to by an Edmunds Straightline blog link:
 
http://www.ukipme.com/engineoftheyear/winners_08/2_25.html
#1184 of 3640
Re: Just test drove... [ateixeira] by redrose1
May 08, 2008 (7:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (May 07, 2008 10:25 am)

We have narrowed our search for a new car to the Forester turbo or the Acura RDX.We like the ride of the forester, large windows, etc. Howver the RDX is more tempting because of its luxury. Any avdvice? (We are in our mid 50's and occasionally take long road trips).
Thanks for your help!
#1185 of 3640
Re: Award for the 2.5 turbo [kurtamaxxxguy] by kdshapiro
May 08, 2008 (7:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (May 08, 2008 6:12 am)

Is that from these judges?
 
http://www.worldcarfans.com/9080507.013/bmw-wins-world-engine-of-the-year-award
#1186 of 3640
Re: Just test drove... [redrose1] by ateixeira
May 08, 2008 (7:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: redrose1 (May 08, 2008 7:01 am)

I found the RD-X a bit small, plus it's a bit beyond what we want to spend.
 
What kind of things were you looking for?
 
The stereo opening is double-DIN sized, so the sky is the limit. You can get any of the best aftermarket GPS systems with a lot of features OE systems do not offer. That might more than make up for it.
 
Nowadays, they're not cutting and splicing, either. The double-DIN stereos fit with a stock look, and they use harnesses to plug things in. I've installed 2 double-DINs and one single DIN sized stereo myself but you could rely on a retailer like Circuit City if you prefer.
 
Let me post up one example:
 
Kenwood Excelon DNX8120
 
Features:
 
Plays DVDs
Garmin Navigation
big 7" screen
optional Garmin FM traffic receiver
XM Traffic/Weather ready
built-in Bluetooth
compatible with Kenwood iPod adapter, HD Radio tuner
compatible with most factory steering wheel audio controls
 
$1500 from Crutchfield. Wait for a free installation special from Circuit City.
 
I know the Acura RL has traffic (RD-X, dunno?), that's why I specifically searched for one that had that feature.
 
That is the top of the line model, there are a few cheaper ones with fewer features.
 
I guess I just prefer aftermarket stuff. Instead of paying $2000 for a tiny 8" DVD screen on my minivan, I paid $900 and got 12".
#1187 of 3640
Re: Just test drove... [redrose1] by rsholland
May 08, 2008 (8:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: redrose1 (May 08, 2008 7:01 am)

Tough choice. I personally don't care for the RDX's styling, but other than that it's a great car. The Acura will likely have a longer warranty, as it's a premium brand. My guess is it would be more expensive too.
 
The Acura, from what I understand, has an excellent AWD system. It also has a 5-speed automatic, whereas the Forester has a 4-speed automatic. The Acura's Tech Package is probably more sophisticated than the Forester's NAV unit. The Forester can tow more, if that's important. My guess is the roof rack load rating is also higher on the Forester.
 
Of the two you're comparing, I think it would be the better choice—but you'll probably end up paying more for it.
 
Bob
#1188 of 3640
2008 vs 2009 Forester - Help! by sgloon
May 08, 2008 (9:13 am)
Reply
Help!
I'm trying to decide between the 2008 vs 2009 Forester. I have a great price on the 2008 and like the visibility, and that it is a little smaller. The cup holders are too small to be useable. I thought the seats seemed a bit hard after being in it for a while. Will they "break in" at all?
I'd like to hear any comments that 2008 or 2009 owners have pro or con about their vehicles now that they have had time to drive them.
If anyone has driven both versions, comments comparing them would be helpful as well.
  
Thanks!

Messages Page 119 of 365
1
...
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
...
365
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement