Sign In Join 



2009 Subaru Forester

3630 messages,  Last post on Nov 06, 2009 at 12:19 PM

You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Future Vehicle, Wagon


Messages Page 118 of 364
1
...
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
...
364
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1169 of 3630
The turbo furor dies down by kurtamaxxxguy
May 06, 2008 (2:45 pm)
Reply
Apparently Subaru has resumed production of Turbo engines. The problem appeared to be lower bearing wear in a tiny number of engines.
 
My dealer contacted me and told me my vehicle, build around Jan 8 or so, was not affected by the recall. And given it's gone over 1000 miles without knocking sounds, perhaps it will be fine. Its noises are a flap of the (I think) air pump valve after startup, and the overhead creaks (where the latest trick of applying silicon lube to all the cables and inner upper roof surface is waiting for verification - I__despise__creaks
#1170 of 3630
Re: Just test drove... [lucyinfiniti] by bbthomas
May 06, 2008 (3:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lucyinfiniti (May 05, 2008 6:28 pm)

"i also can't but help but wonder why Subaru is still using a 4-speed automatic what with everyone wither switching to CVT's or 5,6, or 7 speed automatics..."
 
I was also surprised by this and was hoping for the 5EAT. MT just had a base model comparison in which the Forester placed 1st. Based on their data it has the highest RPM in top gear.
 
Top-gear revs 60 mph:
CR-V - 1900 rpm (5AT)
Rogue - 2000 rpm (CVT)
VU - 1900 rpm (4AT)
Forester - 2450 rpm (4AT)
RAV4 - 2200 rpm (4AT)
#1171 of 3630
Re: MPG [leo2633] by paisan
May 06, 2008 (3:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: leo2633 (May 06, 2008 12:47 pm)

Was about to say all the cars in NJ and NY are PZEV
 
-mike
#1172 of 3630
Re: Just test drove... [bbthomas] by volkov
May 06, 2008 (4:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bbthomas (May 06, 2008 3:28 pm)

and as your list shows, the majority of comparable vehicles come only with a 4AT. To be fair, the list does miss the Mitsu with a 6. Tuscon runs a 4AT, Santa Fe a 4 or 5 AT. I think though that while the 4AT is acceptable in the n/a engine, the XT should have the 5EAT subie already makes.
#1173 of 3630
No Problem With The T (kurtamaxxxguy) by tkay
May 07, 2008 (1:38 am)
Reply
Good news on your ride..Thats Cool!!!!!! does anyone know if they sell Blue Pearl Spray can paint.
#1174 of 3630
XT .vs. X auto transmissions by kurtamaxxxguy
May 07, 2008 (6:30 am)
Reply
from cars101.com:
 
X: Automatic (and in LL, Automatic Sportshift 4speed):
1st 2.785, 2nd 1.545, 3rd 1.0, 4th 0.694 reverse 2.272; final 4.444
 
XT: Automatic SportShift 4speed:
1st 2.785, 2nd 1.545. 3rd 1.0, 4th 0.694, reverse 2.272. Final 4.111
 
Note XT's final drive ratio is lower. This explains why the Turbo keeps its engine revs down at freeway cruising speeds (at 60 mph, I see around 2K revs.).
 
Motor Trend claims the XT gets from 0 to 60 in about 6.6 sec, ..vs.. 9.9 sec for the X series. They also remark that the turbo is a twin scroller, and doesn't have the usual turbo rush (latter seems true for me).
 
You will use more fuel with the XT. I have yet to break 20 mpg with mine, though nearly all my driving's on local streets with plenty of traffic lights. At least the engine doesn't burn oil
 
And as for the magic foam, tkay, a lot of that went away in lieu of silicone lube on the wiring harnesses in the roof (wires like to move around up there and they kept rubbing the roof or the plastic light housing). Once it warms up here I'll know whether or not the new setup works.
#1175 of 3630
Re: MPG [leo2633] by ateixeira
May 07, 2008 (10:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: leo2633 (May 06, 2008 12:47 pm)

PZEV? Hmm, tempting.
 
What exit?
 
 
#1176 of 3630
Re: The turbo furor dies down [kurtamaxxxguy] by ateixeira
May 07, 2008 (10:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (May 06, 2008 2:45 pm)

Glad to hear that, kurt.
 
I guess a certain person who called your engine a lemon now has his foot in his mouth.
 
#1177 of 3630
Re: MPG [ateixeira] by leo2633
May 07, 2008 (10:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (May 07, 2008 10:08 am)

juice,
 
Exit 82 on the Garden State Parkway. If you are interested, go to their website, and print yourself out a $250.00 coupon. It'll pay for your gas and tolls! Seriously, though, it's probably only a few hours away for you.
 
Len
#1178 of 3630
Re: Just test drove... [bbthomas] by ateixeira
May 07, 2008 (10:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: bbthomas (May 06, 2008 3:28 pm)

Keep in mind the Forester was the only AWD model in that test. I'm not sure if the AWD option on the others affects the gearing. Probably in some cases, because manufacturers gear AWD models shorter to offset the extra weight and drivetrain loss.
 
Edit: Toyota does use a shorter final drive for its AWD Sienna, compared to the FWD model. So it's likely they do the same for the RAV4.
 
Make sure you read the whole review, though. You might miss some highlights:
 
* most lateral grip (tied)
* most HP
* lightest
* best ride
* best visibility
* 2nd best braking
* most ground clearance
* tightest turning circle (despite AWD)
* most balanced weight distribution
* highest towing capacity
* most headroom front and rear
* most front legroom
* 2nd best figure 8
 
The funny part was this:
 
this rare thing called "great outward vision."
 
So true!

Messages Page 118 of 364
1
...
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
...
364
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement