Sign In Join 



2009 Subaru Forester

3630 messages,  Last post on Nov 06, 2009 at 12:19 PM

You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Future Vehicle, Wagon


Messages Page 118 of 364
1
...
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
...
364
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1167 of 3630
Re: Just test drove... [kdshapiro] by redherring1
May 06, 2008 (11:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: kdshapiro (May 06, 2008 11:03 am)

But the F/e will be better, so it's probably a wash. Premium fuel does not cost twice as much per tank. At $.20 spread it's a couple of bucks per tank.
 
It's actually more than a wash--it's substantially in favor of the Forester. According to fueleconomy.gov (the government's official gas mileage site), a Cherokee with the 4.0L six got 14 city, 19 hwy, with an annual fuel cost of $3384; the Forester XT gets 19 city, 24 hwy with an annual fuel cost of $2742 (annual fuel cost is based on several assumptions re city vs. hwy driving and fuel prices that may not be how Lucy drives, but at least the comparison is apples to apples).
#1168 of 3630
Re: MPG [ateixeira] by leo2633
May 06, 2008 (12:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (May 06, 2008 9:14 am)

juice,
 
I can understand her not wanting to come to Jersey!
 
According to the Subaru website, all Foresters sold here are, in fact, PZEV rated.
 
Len
#1169 of 3630
The turbo furor dies down by kurtamaxxxguy
May 06, 2008 (2:45 pm)
Reply
Apparently Subaru has resumed production of Turbo engines. The problem appeared to be lower bearing wear in a tiny number of engines.
 
My dealer contacted me and told me my vehicle, build around Jan 8 or so, was not affected by the recall. And given it's gone over 1000 miles without knocking sounds, perhaps it will be fine. Its noises are a flap of the (I think) air pump valve after startup, and the overhead creaks (where the latest trick of applying silicon lube to all the cables and inner upper roof surface is waiting for verification - I__despise__creaks
#1170 of 3630
Re: Just test drove... [lucyinfiniti] by bbthomas
May 06, 2008 (3:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lucyinfiniti (May 05, 2008 6:28 pm)

"i also can't but help but wonder why Subaru is still using a 4-speed automatic what with everyone wither switching to CVT's or 5,6, or 7 speed automatics..."
 
I was also surprised by this and was hoping for the 5EAT. MT just had a base model comparison in which the Forester placed 1st. Based on their data it has the highest RPM in top gear.
 
Top-gear revs 60 mph:
CR-V - 1900 rpm (5AT)
Rogue - 2000 rpm (CVT)
VU - 1900 rpm (4AT)
Forester - 2450 rpm (4AT)
RAV4 - 2200 rpm (4AT)
#1171 of 3630
Re: MPG [leo2633] by paisan
May 06, 2008 (3:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: leo2633 (May 06, 2008 12:47 pm)

Was about to say all the cars in NJ and NY are PZEV
 
-mike
#1172 of 3630
Re: Just test drove... [bbthomas] by volkov
May 06, 2008 (4:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bbthomas (May 06, 2008 3:28 pm)

and as your list shows, the majority of comparable vehicles come only with a 4AT. To be fair, the list does miss the Mitsu with a 6. Tuscon runs a 4AT, Santa Fe a 4 or 5 AT. I think though that while the 4AT is acceptable in the n/a engine, the XT should have the 5EAT subie already makes.
#1173 of 3630
No Problem With The T (kurtamaxxxguy) by tkay
May 07, 2008 (1:38 am)
Reply
Good news on your ride..Thats Cool!!!!!! does anyone know if they sell Blue Pearl Spray can paint.
#1174 of 3630
XT .vs. X auto transmissions by kurtamaxxxguy
May 07, 2008 (6:30 am)
Reply
from cars101.com:
 
X: Automatic (and in LL, Automatic Sportshift 4speed):
1st 2.785, 2nd 1.545, 3rd 1.0, 4th 0.694 reverse 2.272; final 4.444
 
XT: Automatic SportShift 4speed:
1st 2.785, 2nd 1.545. 3rd 1.0, 4th 0.694, reverse 2.272. Final 4.111
 
Note XT's final drive ratio is lower. This explains why the Turbo keeps its engine revs down at freeway cruising speeds (at 60 mph, I see around 2K revs.).
 
Motor Trend claims the XT gets from 0 to 60 in about 6.6 sec, ..vs.. 9.9 sec for the X series. They also remark that the turbo is a twin scroller, and doesn't have the usual turbo rush (latter seems true for me).
 
You will use more fuel with the XT. I have yet to break 20 mpg with mine, though nearly all my driving's on local streets with plenty of traffic lights. At least the engine doesn't burn oil
 
And as for the magic foam, tkay, a lot of that went away in lieu of silicone lube on the wiring harnesses in the roof (wires like to move around up there and they kept rubbing the roof or the plastic light housing). Once it warms up here I'll know whether or not the new setup works.
#1175 of 3630
Re: MPG [leo2633] by ateixeira
May 07, 2008 (10:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: leo2633 (May 06, 2008 12:47 pm)

PZEV? Hmm, tempting.
 
What exit?
 
 
#1176 of 3630
Re: The turbo furor dies down [kurtamaxxxguy] by ateixeira
May 07, 2008 (10:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (May 06, 2008 2:45 pm)

Glad to hear that, kurt.
 
I guess a certain person who called your engine a lemon now has his foot in his mouth.
 

Messages Page 118 of 364
1
...
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
...
364
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement