You are here:
Forums
Wagons
Subaru Crew
Subaru Forester
2009 Subaru Forester

3661 messages, Last post on Nov 30, 2009 at 8:56 AM
You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram
|
Replying to: volkov (May 06, 2008 9:25 am) My friend's Altima has that, I thought it was a bit gimmicky. The Rogue must have it, since Nissan offers it. I found out Subaru offers remote start for the automatics. I don't want that, as it only wastes fuel and the heated seats work right away so no need to wait for it to warm up.
|
|
|
Replying to: volkov (May 06, 2008 9:25 am) I wasn't either but I'm not familiar enough with the current offerings to call her on it. I know that feature is becoming a fairly common option in luxury vehicles so I'm sure it will eventually trickle down to the rest. -Frank |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kdshapiro (May 05, 2008 6:46 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: lucyinfiniti (May 06, 2008 10:32 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (May 06, 2008 9:38 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: redherring1 (May 05, 2008 6:48 am) Thank you for visiting the Subaru Web site and for your message. The information provided to you by your Subaru dealer is correct. The current iPod Interface is not applicable to your 2009 Forester 2.5XT Ltd model. The stereo system in our 2009 Forester 2.5X and 2.5X Premium Package models is from a different manufacturer than the system in our other 2009 Forester models, including the 2.5XT models. The system in your Forester is not compatible with the current iPod Interface. We are working on an iPod Interface that will be compatible with the stereo system in your Forester. I have been advised that this should be available for purchase this summer. Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance. Sincerely, John J. Mergen Subaru of America, Inc. Customer/Dealer Services Department My first thought was that this resolves the issue, but since this is a different response than comet48 got as to the same system (in the LL Bean and the XT Limited), I think I'll just wait for them to work it out this summer. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kdshapiro (May 06, 2008 11:03 am) It's actually more than a wash--it's substantially in favor of the Forester. According to fueleconomy.gov (the government's official gas mileage site), a Cherokee with the 4.0L six got 14 city, 19 hwy, with an annual fuel cost of $3384; the Forester XT gets 19 city, 24 hwy with an annual fuel cost of $2742 (annual fuel cost is based on several assumptions re city vs. hwy driving and fuel prices that may not be how Lucy drives, but at least the comparison is apples to apples). |
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (May 06, 2008 9:14 am) I can understand her not wanting to come to Jersey! According to the Subaru website, all Foresters sold here are, in fact, PZEV rated. Len
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently Subaru has resumed production of Turbo engines. The problem appeared to be lower bearing wear in a tiny number of engines. My dealer contacted me and told me my vehicle, build around Jan 8 or so, was not affected by the recall. And given it's gone over 1000 miles without knocking sounds, perhaps it will be fine. Its noises are a flap of the (I think) air pump valve after startup, and the overhead creaks (where the latest trick of applying silicon lube to all the cables and inner upper roof surface is waiting for verification - I__despise__creaks
|
|
|
Replying to: lucyinfiniti (May 05, 2008 6:28 pm) I was also surprised by this and was hoping for the 5EAT. MT just had a base model comparison in which the Forester placed 1st. Based on their data it has the highest RPM in top gear. Top-gear revs CR-V - 1900 rpm (5AT) Rogue - 2000 rpm (CVT) VU - 1900 rpm (4AT) Forester - 2450 rpm (4AT) RAV4 - 2200 rpm (4AT)
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Wagons
Subaru Crew
Subaru Forester
2009 Subaru Forester
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Subaru Forester



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats