- #168 of 260
-
re: mileag for 10 RX 350 [md_outback]
by wwest
-
Apr 14, 2009 (9:41 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: md_outback (Apr 14, 2009 5:24 am)
The closer you can get to diesel octane levels and still not incur knock/ping the more energy will be available for each unit measure of fuel. The new wide band non-resonant knock sensors along with EFI provide that capability.
|
- #169 of 260
-
Re: 2010 RX [rparis]
by mickey34
-
Apr 14, 2009 (3:52 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: rparis (Apr 13, 2009 1:03 pm)
Hi rparis Premium is required per the dealer to get the best gas millage. the car is designed to use Premium. As far as city gas millage I have not really tested yet. Overall the millage is around 19 Mpg.
|
- #170 of 260
-
Re: 2010 RX [mickey34]
by rparis
-
Apr 14, 2009 (5:00 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: mickey34 (Apr 14, 2009 3:52 pm)
Have you tried regular unleaded?
Me ES runs great on regular although a higher octane is indicated in the owner's guide. I hear no pinging and the car has great pick up and great mpg.
|
- #171 of 260
-
Re: 2010 RX [mickey34]
by wwest
-
Apr 14, 2009 (5:12 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: mickey34 (Apr 14, 2009 3:52 pm)
"..the car is designed to use premium..."
No modern day engine is designed to use premium exclusively.
It's likely the best FE might be obtained with Premium but regular can be used and just might be more economical overall.
|
- #172 of 260
-
Re: 2010 RX [wwest]
by rparis
-
Apr 15, 2009 (5:30 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: wwest (Apr 14, 2009 5:12 pm)
From what I understand, using a higher grade of gas is a waste of money if a vehicle runs well on regular, I wonder why the manufacturer would suggest premium if regular works without any problems??
|
- #173 of 260
-
Re: 2010 RX [rparis]
by wwest
-
Apr 15, 2009 (8:45 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: rparis (Apr 15, 2009 5:30 am)
HP....SELLS...!!
Especially to the "boy-racer", 0-60MPH mentality "set".
As a general rule the advertised HP rating is only with the recommended premium fuel.
"...waste of money.."
Depends on the price spread and mpg attainable between the two octane levels.
|
- #174 of 260
-
Re: 2010 RX [rparis]
by mickey34
-
Apr 15, 2009 (2:03 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: rparis (Apr 14, 2009 5:00 pm)
I was told by my friend who is a great mechanic that I could use the 89 octane and be ok. I may try that after the car has a few thousand miles. I only have arround 700 miles and already notice more pickup. I really love the new RX. Mike
|
- #175 of 260
-
Re: 2010 RX [mickey34]
by rparis
-
Apr 15, 2009 (3:00 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: mickey34 (Apr 15, 2009 2:03 pm)
According to a sales person at Lexus, next year Lexus will recommend 89 octane as a result of 3 years of research.
Did you ask your mechanic his thoughts on 87 octane-does he think mpg would not be as good which is what I was told by a mile or so per gallon?
|
- #176 of 260
-
Re: 2010 RX [mickey34]
by maximafan
-
Apr 15, 2009 (9:11 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: mickey34 (Apr 15, 2009 2:03 pm)
Mickey, my service department guy told me from the very beginning when I got my '07 RX350 back in August of 2006 that running regular unleaded would be perfectly fine with this vehicle. I would imagine since the 2010 RX has the same 3.5 liter engine with a little horsepower increase that it should be no different as far as handling the regular unleaded gas.
|
- #177 of 260
-
Re: 2010 RX [rparis]
by mickey34
-
Apr 15, 2009 (10:02 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: rparis (Apr 15, 2009 3:00 pm)
I will be bringing my car in for the 1000 mile checkup next monday. I know the service person for a long time, I will ask him about the gas question. I will post sometime next week. Mike
|