Last post on Dec 08, 2013 at 1:46 PM
You are in the Acura MDX
What is this discussion about?
Acura MDX, SUV
Go to NHTSA to file a safety complaint.
Or call Monday-Friday (8 am to 8 pm ET) (888) 327-4236 TTY: (800)424-9153
#191 of 996 Re: 2002 MDX transmission replacement [franklinben]
Feb 15, 2010 (3:05 pm)
Well, I know this. Our previous vehicles were Jeep, Dodge and then this 2002 Acura MDX. Here's the scorecard: Jeep Grand Cherokee 100,000 miles, no issues except a stereo; fixed under warranty. Dodge Grand Caravan, 205,000 miles, no issues. Acura MDX, 89,000 miles, THREE TRANSMISSIONS. The first one went out at 37,000 miles, the second started misbehaving at 83.000, finally crapped out at 86,000. Because we bought it new and because we had almost all maintenance, including major services, done at the dealer, Honda did "goodwill" a major portion of the cost of the third transmission. Then we found out that the timing belts only last about 90,000 miles and that was another $600. Oh and the rear main seal started leaking.
I have a little more leverage because I work at a chain of dealerships and can get inside a little bit. The Acura store is part of that chain, but the reason Honda paid for the goodwill is because we serviced at the Acura store and Honda could verify the services.
I can tell you this: Japanese car quality is a myth. Both Honda and Toyota are still cashing in on a reputation that used to be true, but no longer applies. I see the behind the scenes and both GM and Chrysler have every bit as good a quality as Honda or Toyota. Probably Ford does too, but we don't have one of their dealerships.
Both Toyota and Honda are superior in one way: suppressing bad news. The general public still doesn't know about the Acura problems and they are just starting to hear about the Toyota problems that have been manifest for years.
Feb 19, 2010 (12:07 pm)
The issues being reported appear to be on 2006 and prior models. Was the tramission issue fixed with the redesign in 2007 or is it just too early to tell since few of 2007 or newer would have 70k+ miles?
#193 of 996 On the other hand
Feb 20, 2010 (6:23 am)
Interesting comments about automatic transmissions in general and MDX in particular.
I have a 2005 MDX with 104K miles. No repairs other than brakes. There are no indications of any issues.
For what it is worth, I have been buying new cars since 1968, all with automatic transmissions, kept ALL for over 100K miles (many, closer to 150K). I have NEVER had a problem with an automatic transmission. I follow the maintenance schedules in the owners' manual (not the dealers' recommendations) and always service at the dealer during warranty period. After that, if I think the dealer is the most competent and reliable shop, I go with them nevermind their pricey rates.
* 1968 Ford Mustang (100K+)
* 1971 Buick Skylark (~110K)
* 1972 Chevrolet Vega (100K+)
* 1974 Buick Century wagon (120K+)
* 1979 Buick Skyhawk (then end of my relationship with Garbage Motors) (100K+)
* 1984 Ford Econoline E-150 (~110K)
* 1987 Toyota pickup (100K+)
* 1988 Mazda 929 (~120K)
* 1990 Volvo 740 (150K)
* 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee (150K)
* 2001 Mercedes E-320 (currently, 112K)
* 2005 Acura MDX (currently, 104K) also, the most reliable of all I have owned.
Draw your own conclusions.
#194 of 996 Re: 2010 MDX [brian30]
Feb 26, 2010 (7:40 am)
Sorry to inform you - but I just purchased a 2010 MDX and after 3 weeks - the transmission has already been replaced! If that isn't bad enough the transmission on my 2004 MDX died after 4 years. I took the chance and purchased another one after being reassured that the problem was fixed and looks like I made a bad decision.
Feb 26, 2010 (8:15 am)
The NTSA is under fire right now for all of the missteps on Toyota. If you have had a possilbe near wreck, they need to hear about it. And, there are already several complaints on the transmission problem in general. Everyone please at least file a formal NTSA complaint on their website (you will need the VIN number of your vehicle) and perhaps at least we will get some notice that there is a serious problem here. I guess someone's car has to run of the road and kill someone before Acura will step up too. At least it will be well documented.
To the fellow with 2010, that is a huge bummer. I don't think Honda will be getting my business anymore.
#196 of 996 2001 MDX - Time for 2nd Tranny
Feb 28, 2010 (4:33 pm)
The dealer replaced my Transmission 3 1/2 years ago with just under 100k miles. I now have 145k and it is starting to shudder again. I plan on buying a 2010 TL AWD in the near future and want to leverage that purchase to negotiate some type of discount when I eventually have to replace the transmission again (planning to keep the MDX in the family). What do you think I should ask for? (E.g. 35% off; parts and labor at cost; other???)
Anyone actually know what the going rate is for the Transmission replacement these days?
#197 of 996 Possible failure at 29K miles
Mar 01, 2010 (9:42 am)
A few months back noticed this brief buzzing/rumbling noise from the car at 35-45 mph (in the 1500rpm region so it would be 5th gear I guess). Kind of like the noise when you drive over the rumble-strip on the highway but it lasts about 1 second. From what I've read on this and other forums, sounds suspiciously like a transmission/torque converter problem. The car is a 2005, but only has a bit over 29,000 miles on it!. No 'check engine'/error codes show. Ours even has the transmission cooler added becuase we have the tow hitch installed (but we only use the hitch to attach a bike rack, never ever towed anything).
No way am I going to fork over thousands to fix this, the warranty period expired 9 months ago, but I'm 18,000 below the mileage warranty. If I have to pay more than 10% of the cost, I'm going to engage in a massive negative campaign against Acura. I've heard a lot of cases with people having this problem 50K+ miles, but 30K, and we baby the vehicle is pretty disappointing.
#198 of 996 Re: 2001 MDX - Time for 2nd Tranny [jrcarguy]
Mar 01, 2010 (10:32 am)
$3000-$4000 is what I had been quoted for transmission replacement with a rebuilt tranny.
The TL and the MDX used the same transmission technology. Why in God's name would you ever want to get another Acura? The TL automatics were horrible.
I have had many vehicles over the past 20 years, some with over 200,000 miles. This includes Jeeps, Caravans and GMCs. The only problem vehicle ever was this Acura MDX with three transmissions in 89000 miles.
I have never seen a vehicle as fragile as this Acura and after one experience, there is no way I would ever spend my money on any Honda product again. Just like Toyota owners who clung to a myth of superiority, I see the people on this list blindly swallowing the "higher quality" garbage from Honda. Honda just hasn't had their Toyota moment yet.
My advice is: Take off the blinders and look at other brands.
#199 of 996 Re: Possible failure at 29K miles [rbhjr]
Mar 01, 2010 (11:26 am)
Welcome to the club!
#200 of 996 Re: 2001 MDX - Time for 2nd Tranny [jrcarguy]
Mar 01, 2010 (12:23 pm)
If they don't pay for 90% or better for the transmission, then look for another brand of car. Acura wnats $4,500 list price for a new trans. Independant shops charge $2,500.
Despite what Toyota is going through, I bet you can get some great deals from them.