You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Nissan GT-R
Article Comments - 2009 Nissan GT-R vs. 2008 Porsche 911 Turbo

990 messages, Last post on Sep 05, 2009 at 6:04 AM
You are in the Nissan GT-R Forum. Your Host is claires
2009 Nissan GT-R vs. 2008 Porsche 911 Turbo - Balance and body control of the GT-R are extraordinary through faster, bumpy bends that will have the 911 unsettled enough to make the driver lose confidence. I had a number of heart-in-mouth moments in the Turbo trying to keep up with the GT-R, even with the Porsche's suspension set to its harder Sport setting. (more)
|
Replying to: chrmdome (Dec 26, 2007 1:57 pm) Which is pretty impressive since the first production year for a 911 was 1964. But then again you'd have to also consider that the first production year for a Nissan Skyline was 1957. Of course this new GT-R isn't exactly a skyline but a performance vehicle designed from the ground up for the future with a nod to the skyline heritage. As a 21 year old, I have to say that absolutely no one I know holds Porsche up on a pedestal and since the specs and images of the GTR have been out, zero would go with a Porsche over it. I think there's a huge discrepancy between us and the 40-50 year olds who speak so spiritually about the "porsche experience". Yes I've driven a few and they're ok, but they're just cars. And the GTR seems to do it better. I cringe whenever I hear some old guy say, "well it's still a nissan" as if that's a bad thing. The GTR has achieved a legendary cult status that Porsche can't even imagine. I think big is right, times have changed and I can't see Porsche managing to keep it's sales level as the internet generation comes of age. Actually, the smartest people I know wouldn't get either and would say there's little value in purchasing an expensive car. You can try them out at tracks and experience all the thrills but what's the value of actually purchasing one. All you need from a car really is the point a to b, decent enough looks and luxury, safety, and reliability. Let's face it, if you've got a car that costs more than 30k, it's excess.
|
|
|
Chastise. Chastise. Chastise. Chastise. Chastise. Please..... Spell correctly everyone. It adds credibility to the argument that you're arguing with intelligence. -moo |
|
| the spelling lesson and and personal digs portion of our program. We can now resume our discussion of the 911 Turbo and Nissan GT-R. | |
|
Anyone else read the May 2008 Road & Track cover story (“Outrageous! Nissan’s GT-R SPANKS Porsche 911 Turbo and Corvette Z06”)? The testers thought that the 2wd of the Corvette was insufficient for the power (like trying to control a wild beast on a leash), and that the Porsche Turbo’s rear end could get unglued suddenly and make for a wild ride. GT-R wasn’t plagued by either problem, and soundly “spanks!” the other two at the track, with rather huge lap time wins. All reviewers raved about the GT-R on the track. What surprised me most was Porsche still has the problem of the skittish rear end. I thought they were supposed to have solved that years ago, but I guess not. If I were a Porsche engineer reading these reviews of the GT-R, I’d be a little embarrassed and would want to view the GT-R as a challenge to improve the 911’s handling.
|
|
|
Replying to: epik15 (Apr 04, 2008 3:13 pm) Ahhhhhhhh,,,yes,,,,,,,," excess ". The person with the most CLEAN toys wins....If you can't appreciate the driving difference between a C2S and an Altima... less power to you. To each his own. Every time I get into my 2006 C2S a smile goes across my face. Some people collect wines....I like cars and my Porsche is worth every penny of the $99,999.49 I spent " out the door" for it, and I paid cash..I can afford it and enjoy it.Smart has a great deal to do with being able to earn the money to afford it... Chromedome
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: chrmdome (Apr 08, 2008 7:51 am) In response to Jim's post, my happy thought for the day is: If Merc and Nissan are throwing 2-ton coupes around tracks as fast as 911s, there should be fewer obstacles to overcome before a sedan has that ability. |
|
| have followed this discussion at great length and I am amazed at how the Nissan fans are so pumped up on this new, and I may add, good car they have produced. However, to state that the GTR is a better car than a Porsche is fanciful thinking. Furthermore, I believe this to be wishful thinking coming from people that can't actually own a Porsche or don't appreciate the history and heritage of a 911. I didn't grow up wanting a Porsche, in my case it just happened. In fact, I currently own three Porsche's, a 2002 996 C2 Conv, 2006 Cayenne Turbo and a 2007 997S convertible. I will never sell my 2002 since it was my first 911 and represents a milestone in my life, the discovery of a dormant passion for cars. I love this car just the same as my new 911. I only hope to add to my collection. Porsche is not only about performance, its many things, and in the case of many P owners that I know, Passion is the common denominator. My daily driver is a Honda Accord which I use as my income generator. At the end of my day of work related driving, 150 to 200 miles, I still look forward to getting into one of my 911's and taking it for a drive and enjoying my hard earned dollars on these vehicles. Let's wait and see how the GTR will do. Stating that P owners will also have a GTR in the garage is ludicrous and only illustrates the shallow character of people making such exaggerated claims. Speaking for myself, the only other car I might add, other than a P, would be a Ferrari, enough said. Nissan will not entice Porschista's or Ferrarista's to purchase an ugly ducking with impressive numbers. Their only attraction is to the crowd that cannot afford these fine vehicles and must hide behind the veil that they own a car that cost's half as much with greater or equal performance. Please, give me a break, lets see what the GTR does in long term longevity, racing, and equally important, track day events. I have seen many Viper's, Mustang GT500's, Corvettes and other fancy marketing nomenclature vehicles come and go. Porsche's are and always will be the preferred track cars for people that really take an interest in learning to improve their skills and loving every second that we are on the track. Good luck to the GTR and may they sell more of these vehicles than 911's because at the end of my day my 996 still puts a large smile on my face. | |
|
|
|
Replying to: 911nut (Apr 08, 2008 8:54 pm) I don't think anyone actually said 'better'. GT-R fans frequently return to 'faster'. But better is subjective, it can't be measured, and there is no use arguing it. Nobody is going to change what you like, for whatever your reasons. No, history and heritage are useless trivia in terms of automotive engineering. I will never appreciate such things as much because I do not think it logical to develop premonitions on modern cars based on extinct ones. Actually one of the first American reviews of a GT-R was by a man in California who bought a J-spec and shipped it over and parked it next to his GT3. And he loves both cars for various reasons, but he gave the GT-R rave reviews for its crushing speed. So the ludicrous statements are that these are for people that can't afford Porsches. There are many who will be able to afford Porsches, and not see the point. I've driven my fair share and there was nothing really memorable about it. Its just a Porsche. Go ahead and keep it as the favorite on the track. Less competition. |
|
|
Replying to: 911nut (Apr 08, 2008 8:54 pm) Personally, I can't afford either right now. that shouldn't mean that I can't contribute to the conversation, or have an opinion on which i prefer better. you certainly have the right to love your Porsche better than the GT-R. not every car is for every person. -thene
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Nissan GT-R
Article Comments - 2009 Nissan GT-R vs. 2008 Porsche 911 Turbo
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Nissan GT-R
2010 Porsche 911



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats