Sign In Join 



Should the US government bring back the 55 mph max speed limit again?

1418 messages,  Last post on Dec 16, 2008 at 11:21 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 5 of 143
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
143
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#36 of 1418
Lowering the Speed Limit to 55 by andres3
Dec 05, 2007 (10:16 pm)
Reply
is the worst idea one could ever imagine or think of.
 
In fact, if Hitler was still alive, it would be a MUCH better idea to vote him as President of the USA in 2008 than to lower the speed limit to 55. That's HOW BAD of an idea it is.
 
If anything, we should mandate that States CANNOT set maximum speed limits below 80 MPH. Also, they should allow vigilante justice on slow blockers of the fast lane by allowing video tapes to suffice for fines on people blocking the fast lane at low speeds when they should be going faster. I'd love to send in video tapes to punish traffic "jammers" otherwise known as slow drivers in the fast lane in CA. Previous posts are absolutely correct about slow drivers blocking the fast lane in CA. It seems the slow pokes are as determined to block and cause traffic jams in the fast lane as fast drivers are to make the slow lane the fastest moving lane!!!!
 
The right lane seems to always be the fastest moving lane these days in CA; no matter where you go. Shameful!
#37 of 1418
Re: Lowering the Speed Limit to 55 [andres3] by steve_ HOST
Dec 05, 2007 (10:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andres3 (Dec 05, 2007 10:16 pm)

Welp, there goes Godwin's Law. Comparing Hitler to speed limits no less.
 
Must be time to shut this one down already.
#38 of 1418
Re: Lowering the Speed Limit to 55 [andres3] by gagrice
Dec 05, 2007 (10:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andres3 (Dec 05, 2007 10:16 pm)

It seems the slow pokes are as determined to block and cause traffic jams in the fast lane
 
Somehow CA has attracted a lot of tree hugging, no nothing environmentalists. They feel they are taking the high ground by slowing down the flow of traffic. I would take their license away until they have taken a course in highway driving etiquette. I have no problem with drivers in the right lane going less than the flow of traffic for whatever the reason. They need to stay in the right lane and stay out of the left lanes and HOV lanes. I do not care if they were given an HOV pass because of a stupid law designed to encourage more hybrids. Going 55 MPH when the flow is 75 MPH is DANGEROUS to all those on the highway. GO with the flow or get OFF the highway and take a 35 MPH surface street.
#39 of 1418
Re: Lowering the Speed Limit to 55 [steve_] by gagrice
Dec 05, 2007 (10:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Dec 05, 2007 10:19 pm)

Not sure of that comparison. Did Hiltler impose 55 MPH speed limits? If you look at the original idea. It had some merit. We were in an oil crisis and cars got horrible mileage. It was an idea that did not work out and was repealed. That is where is should stay. In the history books of failed ideas.
#40 of 1418
Re: Lowering the Speed Limit to 55 [gagrice] by andres3
Dec 05, 2007 (10:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm)

And I have another peeve on twisty winding mountain roads.... if your driving a 10 ton SUV please use the turnouts and shoulders to allow sportier better handling cars to pass so they don't have to take every turn at the suggested yellow signed speed limit.
 
I think they should repeal the idea that HOV is for hybrids, it should only be for cars with more than one person in them. I think motorcycles should be banned too, unless they have 2 on the seat also.
 
I think that Chrysler would quickly become the #1 automaker in the US if they were the first to equip their cars with dual .50 caliber machine gun turrets on the front bumper. Perfect for getting someone out of your way that is determined to block you in the fast lane and get you into going the same speed as the slow lane.
 
Or maybe optional upgrades to rocket launchers......
 
I wish I had a trigger button to get trigger happy with sometimes.
 
Reminds me of video games where you get to blow cars up while driving....
 
Instead of honking I want my horn to assume control of the vehicle in front of me so that I can better drive their vehicle for them directly in front of me.
#41 of 1418
Re: Lowering the Speed Limit to 55 [gagrice] by andres3
Dec 05, 2007 (10:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Dec 05, 2007 10:30 pm)

That is where is should stay. In the history books of failed ideas.
 
Sort of like prohibition? I wonder if making alcohol illegal would reduce drunk driving deaths?
#42 of 1418
LOL! by nippononly
Dec 05, 2007 (10:49 pm)
Reply
You guys have me doubled over with laughter at this strong response to the 55 mph proposal! The whole Hitler thing was particularly hilarious. Thank you!
 
Oh, and 1stpik, when I said this:
"more revenues will be garnered from speeding tickets, and that money can be used to finally bring our roads up to better than a third world standard."
I was being facetious.
 
There is no doubt WHATSOEVER in my mind that any reduction in the national speed limit would be completely ignored by a solid 97% (maybe more) of the driving public.
#43 of 1418
Re: LOL! [nippononly] by vchiu
Dec 05, 2007 (11:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Dec 05, 2007 10:49 pm)

>the national speed limit would be completely ignored by a solid 97% (maybe more) of the driving public
 
Right!, but you can bet the remaining 3% model citizen would make sure they drive 55 blocking the others behind them. It is too easy to have 3 cars occupying 3 lanes on the same row, blocking 100 cars. Some times looks like some people already anticipated such a bill.
#44 of 1418
Re: Lowering the Speed Limit to 55 [andres3] by colloquor
Dec 06, 2007 (4:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: andres3 (Dec 05, 2007 10:38 pm)

Illinois is one of the few - or only - states in the midwest where the interstate speed limit is still 65. But, it's still irrelevant as most drive at least 5 MPH over the limit. In and around Chicago on its freeways and tollways if you're not driving 80 regardless of the posted limit, you practically get run over by anyone and everyone, especially the trucks.
 
There's no question that a 55 MPH national limit would save fuel, but I doubt it's going to happen. And, having spent quite a bit of time driving in Europe, I second the motion that American drivers are not only lacking in lane discipline, but discipline and driving courtesy period.
 
When you spend some time in Europe, especially Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, you realize what courtesy is all about, as well as proper driving techniques. I will give you an example: when I was driving in southern Germany near Bodensee or Lake Constance during the summer, I slowed for a stoplight. A BMW pulled up beside me on the left with its radio blaring, just like you hear and see here in the States. However, when I looked over at the driver, and he too looked at me, he not only turned down the music, but rolled up the passenger side window to lower the decibel level of the music even further! Now, how many drivers in the States would do that?? If anything, they would crank it up even louder.
#45 of 1418
Re: LOL! [nippononly] by hpmctorque
Dec 06, 2007 (5:28 am)
Reply
"There is no doubt WHATSOEVER in my mind that any reduction in the national speed limit would be completely ignored by a solid 97% (maybe more) of the driving public."
 
This effectively answers the question of this discussion, "Should the US government bring back the 55 mph max speed limit again?"

Messages Page 5 of 143
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
143
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement