Sign In Join 



Pre-2007 Acuras All Flunk Rear-End Crash Tests

39 messages,  Last post on Jul 19, 2008 at 7:41 AM

You are in the Acura MDX Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Acura MDX, SUV


Messages Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1 of 39
Pre-2007 Acuras All Flunk Rear-End Crash Tests by gordongordo
Dec 03, 2007 (5:39 pm)
Reply
Alas, all the Acuras produced before 2007 --- including my MDX 2006 --- either flunked outright the recent IIHS rear-collision tests or came close to it.
 
That prompts a question: does anyone know whether the 2006 seats and head restraints can be replaced by the post 2007 MDX ones that passed the tests with flying colors?
 
Michael
 
Here's the link to the IIHS results for Acura: http://www.iihs.org/ratings/head_restraints/headrestraints.aspx?acura
#2 of 39
Re: Pre-2007 Acuras All Flunk Rear-End Crash Tests [gordongordo] by upstatedoc
Dec 04, 2007 (5:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: gordongordo (Dec 03, 2007 5:39 pm)

My physics are a little rusty, I believe this test was just for low-impact, rear-ended whiplash protection...... and for tall men?
#3 of 39
Re: Pre-2007 Acuras All Flunk Rear-End Crash Tests [gordongordo] by mecheng1
Dec 04, 2007 (7:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: gordongordo (Dec 03, 2007 5:39 pm)

After looking at the link you provided....I think your "flunked" statement over simplifies the results. It looks like the results change depending on your phyical size and the year of your vehicle. My 2001 scores a "M" (marginal) but the 03 - 05 model scores a "P" (poor).
 
These IIHS tests have become more-and-more sophisticated and the vehicle designs change more frequently....its not valid to extrapolate results from one model year to next model year. IIHS doesn't do it but many magazines try and do it. It is the main reason I recently did not renew my membership in Consumers Union (Consumer Reports).
#4 of 39
Re: Pre-2007 Acuras All Flunk Rear-End Crash Tests [mecheng1] by gordongordo
Dec 04, 2007 (5:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mecheng1 (Dec 04, 2007 7:52 am)

Thank you both for your replies, though I still am hoping somebody can tell me --- probably someone from the Acura company itself --- whether the pre-2007 MDX seats can be swapped for the much safer seats and headrestraints in the MDX produced after June 2007.
 
Here's a link to a fairly full description of the IIHS rear-end collision test: http://www.iihs.org/ratings/head_restraints/head_restraint_info.html
 
Please note two things that you queried about: 1) the dummy is the size of an average size man (first paragraph); 2) the speed used simulates a vehicle of equal size (MDX mid-size SUV, for instance) that slams into the test-sled simulating a 20 mph crash.
 
The results for those of us with Acuras made before 2007 aren't encouraging, just the opposite. And a mediocre score is, as I indicated, "close" to flunking. Note, finally please, that in 50 years of driving, I've been in six accidents --- and 5 were rear-end collisions, one (estimated by the police when I myself was in my very large Mercedes sedan) caused by a vehice going around 40 mph. The whole trunk area was pushed way forward, but nobody in the vehicle was hurt. And we didn't have airbags in those days to cushion the sudden jerk forward after the initial brusque jerk backward against the headrest. (The 6th accident was caused by somebody backing out of his driveway as I made a slow right turn into his street.)
 
What are the likely deficiencies in the pre-2007 MDX (to stay with it)?. Most likely, 1) the design and material of the seat, 2) the support material of the head-rest itself (the geometric design gets a "Good" rating), and 3) the seat-belt --- especially how quickly it restrains an occupant when a collision occurs from behind.
 
I do hope that someone knowledgeable about swapping the seats in the 2006 MDX reads this thread and can help me (and no doubt others) see about an exchange to safer seats and head-restraints (and maybe seat belts). Otherwise, my 2006 Acura MDX --- just purchased, certified, 3 weeks ago --- is a marvelous vehicle.
 
Michael
#5 of 39
Re: Pre-2007 Acuras All Flunk Rear-End Crash Tests [gordongordo] by mecheng1
Dec 05, 2007 (7:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: gordongordo (Dec 04, 2007 5:47 pm)

Michael -
 
Obviously Acura changed something in the MDX design in May of 2007. If you can implement a similar change to you 2006 model...you have it. Since seats of all years passed the "geometry" test with a "G", it may be more than the seat component that needs to be swapped.
 
[You see how Acura made a design change in the middle of the model year in this instance?...lots of the auto magazine and others that quote the IIHS data fail to recognize this and will report that "ALL" MDX's fail this or that test, etc.,etc......lazy journalism]
#6 of 39
Re: Pre-2007 Acuras All Flunk Rear-End Crash Tests [mecheng1] by gordongordo
Dec 05, 2007 (10:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: mecheng1 (Dec 05, 2007 7:02 am)

Yes, Mecheng: I agree, Acura was probably embarrassed by the results --- which were shared by Lexus, by the way, and some Mercedes and BMW vehicles --- and a change in production in the middle of the year, as you note, is a clear indicator . . . or so it seems.
 
I will try to find a way to talk to a Acura engineer back at the factory hdq --- wherever that is --- and see what I can find out. It's no use dealing with the technical service of a dealership. The issue is way beyond their expertise.
 
Michael
#7 of 39
Re: Pre-2007 Acuras All Flunk Rear-End Crash Tests [gordongordo] by upstatedoc
Dec 05, 2007 (11:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: gordongordo (Dec 05, 2007 10:47 am)

I wonder if this info would warrant a recall?
#8 of 39
Re: Pre-2007 Acuras All Flunk Rear-End Crash Tests [mecheng1] by gordongordo
Dec 05, 2007 (11:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: mecheng1 (Dec 05, 2007 7:02 am)

Yes, Mecheng: I agree, Acura was probably embarrassed by the results --- which were shared by Lexus, by the way, and some Mercedes and BMW vehicles --- and a change in production in the middle of the year, as you note, is a clear indicator . . . or so it seems.
 
I will try to find a way to talk to a Acura engineer back at the factory hdq --- wherever that is --- and see what I can find out. It's no use dealing with the technical service of a dealership. The issue is way beyond their expertise.
 
Michael
#9 of 39
Re: Pre-2007 Acuras All Flunk Rear-End Crash Tests [gordongordo] by gordongordo
Dec 05, 2007 (11:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: gordongordo (Dec 05, 2007 11:40 am)

Yes, it would be nice if it did, but I wouldn't count on it unless there were tens of thousands of disgruntled Acura buyers besieging Acura hdqs. with protests.
 
Michael
#10 of 39
Head rest height by upstatedoc
Dec 05, 2007 (12:32 pm)
Reply
So am I to surmise that my '04 MDX failed this test because the head rest height is too low? It's adjustable so that mine is hitting the back of my head much higher than what's shown as poor in the diagram. Anyone else w/ a pre '07 MDX confused by this?

Messages Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement