Article Comments - 2009 Toyota Matrix XRS First Drive

14 messages, Last post on Apr 13, 2008 at 10:09 AM

You are in the Toyota Matrix Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Toyota Matrix, Wagon

First Drive: 2009 Toyota Matrix XRS - A highly practical and refined compact wagon that will appeal to those who are practical and refined, but it's no match in personality for the Mazda3 five-door, even in this sporty XRS flavor. (more) -

Outline

Messages Page 2 of 2: 1; 2; Prev; Next; Last

#8 of 14 RE: posts #5 & #6 [observer999] by nippononly Dec 07, 2007 (1:38 pm)
Replying to: observer999 (Dec 07, 2007 11:05 am) "nippononly: do you have a link to the article you mentioned?" It's currently in the print edition of C&D (January 2008) that just hit the newsstands. Usually C&D doesn't put articles on their website until the next issue has been published.
#9 of 14 Real Life Car by gmahserjian Jan 06, 2008 (7:50 pm)
Sometimes too much emphasis is put on speed & 0-60. Personally, I'm tired of seeing "professional revues" always based on speed. In the real world, I don't need to worry about how fast I can get to 100 mph+ to get to where I'm going. I have a 2004 xr model, which has been a great vehicle for the past 4 1/2 yrs. I'm a 42 yr old male, run 40+ miles per week, coach football & baseball, have 2 kids in multiple sports all thru the year, & my Matrix has been stout. Also my roundtrip mileage to work is 60 miles a day. This car has been most dependable, as well as being sporty & having an edge.
#10 of 14 a step down in looks... by fendertweed Jan 09, 2008 (6:51 pm)
we have an 05 XRS we bought a month ago... this 09 is an ungainly looking thing, definitely a step way down in looks IMO, not a car I would have any interest in owning. But what do I know, I'm 52, my wife is 47 and my "other" car is an old 911, LOL.
#11 of 14 Deanee by cedworth Jan 22, 2008 (11:48 am)
My Matrix XRS 6 speed, 180 hp Yamaha engine was rear-ended this weekend and now is a write-off. So am looking for a replacement. Can anyone tell me the difference between the 2003 and 2004 XRS in as far as the 6 speed, 180 hp Yamaha? Was this available for both years? Thanks from Calgary, Canada Replies to this message: nippononly (Jan 22, 2008 1:02 pm)
#12 of 14 Re: Deanee [cedworth] by nippononly Jan 22, 2008 (1:02 pm)
Replying to: cedworth (Jan 22, 2008 11:48 am) At some point they made some changes related to smog emissions and the engine got downrated on power as a consequence. But I think that was '05, not '04...
#13 of 14 It doesn't add up! by bonesjustice Apr 13, 2008 (7:12 am)
I didn't care for this review. Anyone that buys a crossover (station wagon) for it's sportiness is fooling themselves. Yet time and again, these reviewers focus on the sport model and how fast (or slow) it is. No mention of the lack of a separate rear liftglass in the new model. Or that the front passenger seat doesn't fold on the base model. Or that the new car weighs more and gets less MPG than the old model. Toyota needs to put back the cargo features removed and remove some of the extra weight while they're at it. Oh, and nice math in the review, 40% plus 50% only leaves 5%? Okay. Replies to this message: nippononly (Apr 13, 2008 10:09 am)
#14 of 14 Re: It doesn't add up! [bonesjustice] by nippononly Apr 13, 2008 (10:09 am)
Replying to: bonesjustice (Apr 13, 2008 7:12 am) How could they cancel the separate rear liftglass? To me, that is one of the most valuable features of the car, I really like it. And they did this at almost the same moment as they put separate rear liftglass INTO the new Highlander! It's unclear to me why anyone would buy the Matrix XRS, what with the things they removed from the last-gen model and its lack of extra features vs the S model.