Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Wagons Subaru Crew Subaru Forester Subaru Reliability
83 messages, Last post on Nov 21, 2009 at 12:55 PM
You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram
|
Replying to: sibmx (Nov 24, 2007 8:56 pm) Dealer called me to tell me I need a new engine today. The car has 9600 miles on it. All of the maintenance was done by Subaru at the recommended intervals. This car is such a piece of Junk. Subaru of America is not to helpful either. Very disappointing. I made the mistake of believing all of the reviews.
|
|
|
Anyone else had their 2009 XT Forester had their engine completely fail. Dealer called me back to tell me that the car needs a new engine. This is on a car that has 9600 miles!!! Plus, all of the maintenance was done by Subaru at the proper intervals, etc. What an incredible piece of junk. Very disappointed. Of course; it didnt help that the car engine crapped out thanksgiving night in the snow with my kids in the car....on a remote road in northern michigan. DONT BUY THE XT.....you will pay.
|
|
|
Replying to: dontbuyxt (Dec 01, 2008 8:21 pm) One bad car does not make a bad brand. Sorry that your engine blew up, but any mechanical item (space shuttle included) can and will break. -mike Subaru Guru and Track Instructor |
|
|
Replying to: dontbuyxt (Dec 01, 2008 8:28 pm) |
|
|
I had the original 1998 Forester for 8 years and loved it however, the paint faded fast on the hood, I had to replace the right front brake caliper 3 times, the heat shield constantly loosened up & vibrated annoyingly, and I hated the ugly giraffe cloth seat pattern. BUT, it was fantastic in the snow which is why I mainly bought it. I live in New England with hilly, winding, un-plowed streets. The Forrester never slid, got stuck, or disappointed me one bit. I was going to trade it in for another Subie, but the price was higher by 2005, and many things I wanted were additional add-ons but standard features on other brands. So, I went for a CR-V. Love it except for the handling in snow. It's worthless. I test-drove the new 2010 Forester a few weeks ago and I have to say I was not impressed. How disappointed I was. My Honda is like a Cadillac compared to the new Forester with it's cheap plastic chrome looking interior, it's cramped interior, and it's harsh ride. The moon-roof is awesome though. Love the new exterior styling over my 1998 Forester. Why does Subaru continue to have lousy stereo systems? I would have to downgrade from my current 6 CD, Cassette, 6 speaker standard stereo for a chintzy 4 speaker, 1 cd system? If I went from a 1998 Forester right to a 2010 Forester, i'd be in love. But taking a walk on the "other side" and going back is a let-down. Also after reading so many reviews here on the forums, i'd have to say the reliability has gone down-hill with Subaru. I am sad to say I may not ever buy another one even though their AWD is 2nd to none. 
|
|
|
Replying to: bvf925 (Nov 14, 2009 7:14 am) I'm sort of puzzled when CR-V owners say that - I looked closely at one, and all the plastics are hard, the headliner is peach-fuzz on cardboard, the carpets are thin, and the door grab handles are painted silver and will wear prematurely (to be fair Honda fixes that last one for 2010). I think the interior styling is more subdued so perhaps it doesn't stand out as much as the Forester's, but if you look closely, materials are basically on par with the Forester, and well beneath the Outback's (check out the fabric, padded headliner and matching texture on the pillars).
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Nov 15, 2009 5:31 pm) My CR-V is the square body style, not the new rounded, ladybug/VW Bug style. Mine has zero fake chrome on the inside. The interior is subdued and basic monotone which is probably why I find the new Forester interior kinda' space-like and shockingly ugly (for lack of better definition). We'll see what happens, but I will take an Outback out for a ride when I decide to make the change. Thanks for your input!
|
|
|
Replying to: bvf925 (Nov 16, 2009 3:19 am) The class actually went through some cost cutting. Back in 2006 I remember the Forester had the Tribeca's fabric, padded headliner, and nicer cloth seats, too. I'm sure the CR-V did, also. Both have cut costs. The headliner is that cheap paperboard, with what feels like dryer lint glued on. It probably also saves weight. The RAV4 is no better, so this is par for the price class. I'd be happy with unpainted, matte black plastic trim, but painted fake aluminum is all the rage these days, in just about everything.
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Nov 16, 2009 6:43 am) The two things on this car that strike me as cheap are thus: 1. The sun visors - cheap by any standard, and 2. Interior rattles. I have also never been a fan of the matte, hard dash materials (I much prefer the materials used in the late '90s), but if I actually touched the dash on a regular basis I might care a little more. I have never driven or been inside a CR-V; its second-class AWD system ensures that to continue.
|
|
|
Replying to: xwesx (Nov 16, 2009 9:58 am) I will say this - the blue LED lighting is neat, and you may not even notice if you didn't test drive it at night. Also, the lights fade in and out, no sudden on/off. Those are nice little touches that add to the ambience. The sun visors are cheap, but they're durable, and if you look at competitors, they're actually probably above average.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Wagons Subaru Crew Subaru Forester Subaru Reliability
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Subaru Forester
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
