Sign In Join 



Subaru Reliability

59 messages,  Last post on Dec 02, 2008 at 8:12 AM

You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Wagon


Messages Page 6 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#50 of 59
Re: 98 forester with 216k miles [drmom2] by ateixeira
Aug 28, 2008 (12:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: drmom2 (Aug 28, 2008 9:18 am)

They do, and I saw one on E-bay with 276k miles, but still.
 
216k miles is 216k miles. It will all come down to how the car was maintained.
 
If it's made it this far, though...they must have taken care of it.
 
Inspect the head and valve cover gaskets, and the front and rear main seals, all for oil leaks. Drive the car with the radio off and the windows open, and do a figure 8. That will reveal is any diffs or axles are bad.
 
If it's smooth, then wow! That's all I can say.
#51 of 59
Re: 98 forester with 216k miles [ateixeira] by paisan
Aug 28, 2008 (9:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Aug 28, 2008 12:48 pm)

At 216k you are going to have bushings breaking down on it. If the price is right and you are going to use it local, it may be worth it. However a long highway cruiser it will likely not be.
 
-mike
Motorsports and Modifications Host
#52 of 59
Re: 98 forester with 216k miles [drmom2] by grahampeters
Aug 29, 2008 (11:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: drmom2 (Aug 28, 2008 9:18 am)

G'day
 
My impression is that service life is similar to a Toyota although frequency of minor niggles does tend to build up as mileage grows. I have found it revealing that so many Subaru drivers keep their cars to 300,000km plus (say 188,000mile) and then buy another.
 
The comments by others that this might not be a long distance cruiser at this age are pretty accurate but could be modified if the car has been used carefully for long distances rather than hard driven in the past.
 
Cheers
 
Graham
#53 of 59
Re: 98 forester with 216k miles [drmom2] by aatherton
Aug 30, 2008 (1:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: drmom2 (Aug 28, 2008 9:18 am)

It depends on what you mean by your question. If a Forester and Toyota are maintained, then the Forester has the same mileage potential.
 
But compared to a Toyota, Foresters have a more complex motor and drive train. Double the heads and cams, interference valves that will ruin the motor if the timing belt is not changed on schedule, and a more complex drive drain with more differentials and clutches. And your era Forester also had head gasket problems.
 
So to maintain a Forester well is going to take more and cost more than maintaining a Toyota well. The question is whether that level of maintenance was done for the 216k one owner Forester. Likely it was, or it would not have made it that far. But are you willing to pick up the continuing responsibility at this late point in its life?
#54 of 59
CU's say by kurtamaxxxguy
Sep 02, 2008 (6:51 am)
Reply
If you read CU you will see their repair listings for most Subarus are good for about the first 5 years, after which engine and driveline problems show up. Most Toyotas do better than that.
However, in the newer ('03 and on) Subarus, the issues putting them on CU's charts (bad head gaskets, timing belts, wheel bearings, etc.) have supposedly been fixed.
#55 of 59
Re: 98 forester with 216k miles [aatherton] by ateixeira
Sep 02, 2008 (9:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: aatherton (Aug 30, 2008 1:17 pm)

Those original head gaskets have lasted 216k miles already, so any failure now would be overdue.
#56 of 59
Re: Subaru Reliability [sibmx] by dontbuyxt
Dec 01, 2008 (8:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sibmx (Nov 24, 2007 8:56 pm)

You are right. The reliability is terrible. My experience is based on 2009 xt 4ats that had the engine completely seize. Sounded like silverware in a disposal for a few minutes.
Dealer called me to tell me I need a new engine today. The car has 9600 miles on it. All of the maintenance was done by Subaru at the recommended intervals.
This car is such a piece of Junk. Subaru of America is not to helpful either.
 
Very disappointing. I made the mistake of believing all of the reviews.
#57 of 59
XT engine failure by dontbuyxt
Dec 01, 2008 (8:28 pm)
Reply
Anyone else had their 2009 XT Forester had their engine completely fail.
 
Dealer called me back to tell me that the car needs a new engine. This is on a car that has 9600 miles!!! Plus, all of the maintenance was done by Subaru at the proper intervals, etc. What an incredible piece of junk. Very disappointed.
 
Of course; it didnt help that the car engine crapped out thanksgiving night in the snow with my kids in the car....on a remote road in northern michigan.
 
DONT BUY THE XT.....you will pay.
#58 of 59
Re: Subaru Reliability [dontbuyxt] by paisan
Dec 01, 2008 (8:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dontbuyxt (Dec 01, 2008 8:21 pm)

There are good and bad cars made by every and I mean EVERY manufacturer.
 
One bad car does not make a bad brand. Sorry that your engine blew up, but any mechanical item (space shuttle included) can and will break.
 
-mike
Subaru Guru and Track Instructor
#59 of 59
Re: XT engine failure [dontbuyxt] by ateixeira
Dec 02, 2008 (8:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: dontbuyxt (Dec 01, 2008 8:28 pm)

Yours is the first to do that. Sorry for your bad luck.

Messages Page 6 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement