Sign In Join 



Subaru Reliability

87 messages,  Last post on Nov 28, 2009 at 4:56 AM

You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Wagon


Messages Page 5 of 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#41 of 87
Re: Subaru Reliability [ateixeira] by xwesx
Mar 03, 2008 (10:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Mar 03, 2008 9:24 am)

That is surprising, to me, about the cloth interior. If true and widespread, it would certainly be a step backwards considering 220K miles on my '96 Outback with no problems at all with the cloth. But, if I did have problems with it during the warranty period, you can bet I would hold the manufacturer liable. Failed stitching over that time frame is unacceptable and is certainly a defect. Even ingress and egress every few miles over 30,000 should not cause failure due to wear.
 
That said, I had no problems with the cloth on either of my newer Outbacks (07 and 08) with about 7500 miles put on each.
#42 of 87
Re: Subaru Reliability [xwesx] by ateixeira
Mar 03, 2008 (10:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: xwesx (Mar 03, 2008 10:01 am)

Thing is, they change fabrics used often, some times in just one or two years.
 
My 98 had a thick woven fabric that turned out to be very durable, but didn't feel soft, like the fabric on the higher trim line (S models). But that softer velvet-textured fabric was less durable, as a trade-off.
 
paisan pointed out in another thread that lark6 used to rest his elbow on the window sill and the fabric there had some wear.
#43 of 87
Re: Subaru Reliability [ateixeira] by xwesx
Mar 03, 2008 (10:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Mar 03, 2008 10:18 am)

That is true. My '96 had the woven fabric as well. That stuff was fantastic, but no, it did not feel soft at all.
#44 of 87
Re: Subaru Reliability [ateixeira] by leo2633
Mar 04, 2008 (5:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Mar 03, 2008 10:18 am)

The seat fabric on my '01 Forester S has worn quite well (I just cracked 170 K this weekend) despite my early concerns that it might not be very durable. However, like juice mentioned regarding Ed's car, the fabric on the driver's door panel window sill has also worn, from me using it as an arm rest. Not worn through, but definitely worn noticeably.
 
Len
#45 of 87
Re: Subaru Reliability [leo2633] by ateixeira
Mar 04, 2008 (8:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: leo2633 (Mar 04, 2008 5:53 am)

You must drive a lot with the windows down. I never really rested my elbow there.
#46 of 87
unreliable GT forester by desoto4
Apr 18, 2008 (1:21 am)
Reply
Our forester is a '99 GT auto and it is the most problem car we've ever owned.Before we bought it in 2003 we asked around about the forester for beach work and camping and all round good car and the forester was commonly mentioned.But how wrong were they. After one trip on the beach it destroid a g/box seal then starter motor twice then wheel bearings then radiator then steering rack twice and other rattles , and also when we hooked up our new camper trailer for a three our trip the suspension dropped to about 2 inchs from the ground and not much weight.We were told this is common on many of those things. Plus there are many minor interior faults also(rattles,dash problems,electics) Now the brakes are shaking......I give up..piece of junk. I much prefer my old mitsubishi scorpion work hack for every day driving.
#47 of 87
Re: unreliable GT forester [desoto4] by ateixeira
Apr 18, 2008 (8:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: desoto4 (Apr 18, 2008 1:21 am)

Sounds like you need a true truck. Get something with skid plates and a low range.
 
FWIW, I owned a 98 Forester and drove in on sand often. It was fine. Owned it for 9 years. Sold it and got 30% of what I paid for it back.
 
It was great.
 
Better luck with your next car. Truck, I should say.
#48 of 87
Re: unreliable GT forester [ateixeira] by p0926
Apr 19, 2008 (7:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Apr 18, 2008 8:27 am)

Plus they bought it used. While you save a lot of money that way, the trade off is there's always the possibility that the previous owner abused it
 
-Frank
#49 of 87
98 forester with 216k miles by drmom2
Aug 28, 2008 (9:18 am)
Reply
I'm looking at a 98 forester with 216k one owner well maintained - am I crazy or do these vehicles have the same milage potential as toyota ect? Please help
#50 of 87
Re: 98 forester with 216k miles [drmom2] by ateixeira
Aug 28, 2008 (12:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: drmom2 (Aug 28, 2008 9:18 am)

They do, and I saw one on E-bay with 276k miles, but still.
 
216k miles is 216k miles. It will all come down to how the car was maintained.
 
If it's made it this far, though...they must have taken care of it.
 
Inspect the head and valve cover gaskets, and the front and rear main seals, all for oil leaks. Drive the car with the radio off and the windows open, and do a figure 8. That will reveal is any diffs or axles are bad.
 
If it's smooth, then wow! That's all I can say.

Messages Page 5 of 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement