Sign In Join 



Subaru Reliability

87 messages,  Last post on Nov 28, 2009 at 4:56 AM

You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Wagon


Messages Page 5 of 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#34 of 87
Re: 2002 Forester - Good Bye! [p0926] by ateixeira
Feb 28, 2008 (8:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: p0926 (Feb 27, 2008 2:41 pm)

Wheel bearings should be, but clutch, no. That's usually wear and tear.
#35 of 87
Re: 2002 Forester - Good Bye! [ateixeira] by p0926
Feb 28, 2008 (10:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Feb 28, 2008 8:49 am)

wear and tear Good point.
 
Clutches wear out at significantly different rates depending on driving conditions (city vs highway) and driving habits (jack rabbit starts, slipping the clutch, etc). For instance, it's not uncommon to hear about a young "enthusiastic" driver needing a new clutch before 20k while others can go for more than 150k miles without replacing their clutch. In my case, I sold my Jeep with over 125k miles on the original clutch and fully expect to approach if not exceed that mark with the Forester
 
-Frank
#36 of 87
Re: 2002 Forester - Good Bye! [p0926] by ateixeira
Feb 28, 2008 (10:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: p0926 (Feb 28, 2008 10:27 am)

Yep.
 
I sold my Forester with nearly 90k miles and it was on the original clutch.
 
A friend of mine had an Impreza 2.5RS, 2 years newer, and was on his 2nd clutch (an ACT model) within a couple of years. He abused it, though.
 
AWD burnouts sure are cool but you gotta pay to play!
#37 of 87
Re: 2002 Forester - Good Bye! [ateixeira] by aatherton
Mar 02, 2008 (10:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Feb 28, 2008 10:32 am)

"... I sold my Forester with nearly 90k miles and it was on the original clutch. "
 
Sold my Mazda truck with over 150k miles and original clutch, which had pulled 2000 lbs of boat and trailer every summer since 1991.
Having been a passenger in many manual transmission cars in the past 50 years, I have noticed that very few people use the clutch in a way that will get the most life from it. They are not abusive, but they just don't know.
#38 of 87
Re: Subaru Reliability [sibmx] by djenson
Mar 02, 2008 (10:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: sibmx (Nov 24, 2007 8:56 pm)

Do not get the fabric seats in the 2006-2008 model years. The fabric frays on the seams and even though the car is covered by warranty and they replaced the seat fabric once (with same stuff) the latest current offer is to do my 30000 mile service free. Get the leather and be fore warned the light beige color is a bear to keep clean! I have been dealing with both the dealership and Subaru since August over this problem and I am close to just trading in and going back to a Ford. Ford's I have had in the past always had great warranty coverage for any problem.
Love the car on ice & snow, so far no other problems but the interior fabric.
#39 of 87
Re: Subaru Reliability [djenson] by ateixeira
Mar 03, 2008 (9:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: djenson (Mar 02, 2008 10:56 am)

Ford refused to replace windshield seals on my 1991 Escort GT. My fuel tank opening developed rust and all they could offer me was free undercoating (they didn't even apply it in that area).
 
Both happened under warranty.
 
Seats are a wear item, to be honest I'm surprised they even replaced the covers for you the first time.
 
Another thing - the X model gets different fabric than the upper trim lines. Just check that out before you decide.
 
I wouldn't count on the warranty to fix any of that stuff, from any make to be honest.
#40 of 87
Re: 2002 Forester - Good Bye! by chicagoish
Mar 03, 2008 (9:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: aatherton (Mar 02, 2008 10:47 am)

Regarding my original post about the clutch. The Forester was my wifes, but she had a Toyota Tercel and a Nissan Sentra before that and had over 120K on each and the clutch was fine.
 
Like I said, perhaps are Subaru Kharma was bad or something because I know others have great luck with them.
#41 of 87
Re: Subaru Reliability [ateixeira] by xwesx
Mar 03, 2008 (10:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Mar 03, 2008 9:24 am)

That is surprising, to me, about the cloth interior. If true and widespread, it would certainly be a step backwards considering 220K miles on my '96 Outback with no problems at all with the cloth. But, if I did have problems with it during the warranty period, you can bet I would hold the manufacturer liable. Failed stitching over that time frame is unacceptable and is certainly a defect. Even ingress and egress every few miles over 30,000 should not cause failure due to wear.
 
That said, I had no problems with the cloth on either of my newer Outbacks (07 and 08) with about 7500 miles put on each.
#42 of 87
Re: Subaru Reliability [xwesx] by ateixeira
Mar 03, 2008 (10:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: xwesx (Mar 03, 2008 10:01 am)

Thing is, they change fabrics used often, some times in just one or two years.
 
My 98 had a thick woven fabric that turned out to be very durable, but didn't feel soft, like the fabric on the higher trim line (S models). But that softer velvet-textured fabric was less durable, as a trade-off.
 
paisan pointed out in another thread that lark6 used to rest his elbow on the window sill and the fabric there had some wear.
#43 of 87
Re: Subaru Reliability [ateixeira] by xwesx
Mar 03, 2008 (10:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Mar 03, 2008 10:18 am)

That is true. My '96 had the woven fabric as well. That stuff was fantastic, but no, it did not feel soft at all.

Messages Page 5 of 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement