Sign In Join 



Hyundai Santa Fe vs Nissan Rogue

14 messages,  Last post on Dec 05, 2007 at 8:19 PM

You are in the Hyundai Santa Fe Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Nissan Rogue, Hyundai Santa Fe, SUV


Messages Page 2 of 2
1
2
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#5 of 14
Re: Santa Fe Limited AWD vs Rogue SL AWD w/Leather+Premium [bpizzuti] by kdahlquist
Nov 27, 2007 (12:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bpizzuti (Nov 21, 2007 11:45 am)

I've never driven a Rogue, so I can't comment from personal experience. I will tell you that I LOVE my Santa Fe (2007 Limited AWD).
 
Also, I just used the Edmunds.com compare vehicles tool to look at specs and features of the Rogue and Santa Fe side by side. It looks like they are about the same length, height and wheelbase (within an inch or two in all of those dimensions), but the Santa Fe is about four inches wider. That translates into quite a bit more front and rear shoulder and hip room in the Santa Fe, and an extra inch or two of rear seat leg room and head room in the Santa Fe. The Santa Fe also has a lot more cargo space (78 sq ft Santa Fe vs. 58 sq ft for the Rogue), and towing capacity (3500 lbs. Santa Fe vs. 1500 Rogue).
 
The Santa Fe also seems to offer a lot of features standard on the SE and Limited models that either aren't available or are extra cost options on the SL (high trim) Rogue.
 
Finally, gas mileage doesn't seem all that different. Looking at the Rogue SL SULEV AWD (CARB version) vs. the Santa Fe SE AWD, the Rogue is EPA rated at 21/26 mpg, while the Santa Fe is 19/24 (2007 spec since the 2008 specs aren't on Edmunds, yet). That's translates to about a 9% advantage in mileage for the Rogue, or about 60 gallons of gas for every 15,000 miles of driving. That seems pretty good considering the Santa Fe has a 45% horsepower advantage.
 
At the end of the day, though, you need to buy what makes you happy. Drive them both on the same day, and see which one you like better.
#6 of 14
I chose the Santa Fe by russo5
Nov 27, 2007 (1:27 pm)
Reply
I really only went to drive a Rogue because NissanUSA sent me a voucher for a $50.00 gift card if I drove a Rogue and had the dealer validate the voucher.
It's a nice "little" SUV, in my opinion.
Was not a fan of the CVT transmission. I kept waiting to hear or feel a shift. Weird.
The rear seat room was much smaller than the Santa Fe and the seat of the pants feeling when you mashed the throttle was more substantial in the Santa Fe.
I don't regret buying the SF and I noticed my Nissan dealer has not moved a single Rogue from their lot !
#7 of 14
Re: Santa Fe Limited AWD vs Rogue SL AWD w/Leather+Premium [kdahlquist] by cpca
Nov 27, 2007 (1:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdahlquist (Nov 27, 2007 12:21 pm)

Personally, I think Santa Fe vs. Rogue is a definite case of apples and oranges. It's rather ridiculous to compare a 3900+ lb. 6-cylinder and a 3400+ lb. 4-cylinder.
 
Regarding gas mileage, the AWD Rogue gas mileage translated into 2007 terms would be about 24/30.
#8 of 14
Re: Santa Fe Limited AWD vs Rogue SL AWD w/Leather+Premium [cpca] by jd10013
Dec 01, 2007 (4:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: cpca (Nov 27, 2007 1:44 pm)

Personally, I think Santa Fe vs. Rogue is a definite case of apples and oranges. It's rather ridiculous to compare a 3900+ lb. 6-cylinder and a 3400+ lb. 4-cylinder.
 
I was thinking the same thing. Santa Fe vs. Murano would be a better comparison. People say the rogue is small and has less power. well duh, its a small crossover vehicle designed to get better mpg. If you wan't bigger and more powerfull the murano is your vehicle.
#9 of 14
Re: Santa Fe Limited AWD vs Rogue SL AWD w/Leather+Premium [jd10013] by gizzer777
Dec 01, 2007 (7:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: jd10013 (Dec 01, 2007 4:27 am)

You are correct IMHO..but the Rogue looks pretty nice (Kind of like a baby Santa from the outside) but expensive for what you get. It would have been fine for me since i am single but I like my 07 Santa Fe SE Except for the poor in town gas mileage! You just get so much more for your Money.
#10 of 14
Re: Santa Fe Limited AWD vs Rogue SL AWD w/Leather+Premium [gizzer777] by jd10013
Dec 01, 2007 (8:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: gizzer777 (Dec 01, 2007 7:19 am)

everything will be expensive for what you get when compared to a Hyundai. Well, except maybe kia.
#11 of 14
Re: Santa Fe Limited AWD vs Rogue SL AWD w/Leather+Premium [jd10013] by gizzer777
Dec 01, 2007 (12:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jd10013 (Dec 01, 2007 8:20 am)

Of course the Hyundai gives you more for the $$$ , but Rogues are outrageous here in Reno and EVERY option except the air you breath.....Hopefully the hyundai holds up. Right now, nothing is selling except Hummers, Mercedes, BMW's etc. The rest of the real middle class is not buying and the car dealers are getting killed. No sympathy from here!
 
I have reached the point of Not wanting any more new cars. They are too loaded with things I never want. The exceptios for me are a decent radio, full air bags and the Stability control.
 
Hyundai's deal is in the packaging where you have to buy stuff you never will need to get a single thing that you want (they are all doing that too)
 
If the hyundai does not hold up, I will be looking for something from maybe 2005-2006....To hell with the gov't mandates and the manufacturers!
 
I still like the Hyundai but am a bit Leary about how durable they really are. Mine has been fine since last Feb...I am still a low mileage driver though. In Nevada (the desert) we have no rust so i do not have to think about that and my Se only has the touring Pkg...so.....I am hoping It is a good one and I can enjoy it for say 5+ years. I used to buy a new auto every 2-3 yrs but no more....The more garbage they put in, the worse your odds are IMHO! !
#12 of 14
Re: Santa Fe Limited AWD vs Rogue SL AWD w/Leather+Premium [bpizzuti] by corinnelyn
Dec 05, 2007 (1:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bpizzuti (Nov 21, 2007 11:45 am)

I am currently looking at the Outlander and the Rogue. What made you eliminate the Outlander?
#13 of 14
Re: Santa Fe Limited AWD vs Rogue SL AWD w/Leather+Premium [corinnelyn] by bpizzuti
Dec 05, 2007 (2:07 pm)
Reply

Replying to: corinnelyn (Dec 05, 2007 1:34 pm)

Wasn't very comfortable, and gets the same MPGs as the SantaFe (theoretically anyway)...yet the SantaFe has more power. Also, the Outlander's fuel tank is kinda small....I'd be filling up 3 times a week.
 
Just couldn't get the driver-seat/steering-wheel/gearshift relationship set up right...something was always either too close or too far away. Same thing with the Tuscon (the Sportage didn't have this problem, but there's no Kia dealers around here anymore).
 
Really a shame, because I like the Outlander's features. I might give sitting in one another shot, since I know that particular dealer doesn't get a lot of business, and may really want to move one.
#14 of 14
Re: Santa Fe Limited AWD vs Rogue SL AWD w/Leather+Premium [corinnelyn] by somedai1
Dec 05, 2007 (8:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: corinnelyn (Dec 05, 2007 1:34 pm)

i think for the same features the awd 3.3 limited santa fe had - the outlander's price was outlandish...
 
the outlander engine was kind of loud too..

Messages Page 2 of 2
1
2
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement