Jeep Liberty Power Windows

Replying to: ena1512 (Jan 13, 2009 7:13 am)

It's interesting that your link didn't mention one of Rand's inner circle, Alan Greenspan. He's said that Rand's theories have "come a cropper". (well, he didn't use those exact words).
 
But we digress.
 
I can't keep track of all the various make/model issues around here, but is your problem the recurring one with the plastic gizmo that keeps falling off the window track (or does it fall of the motor?), sometimes letting the window drop into the door? Revision J doesn't sound too encouraging.

Replies to this message:
• ena1512 (Jan 15, 2009 7:49 pm)

Replying to: ena1512 (Jan 13, 2009 7:13 am)

Hi ena1512,
The article you refer to is exactly, word to word, the substance of EU public debates.
Industry is fine, it's the bankers that have 'cold feet'. We now have public mediators to negotiate credit lines for companies that already have their production potential fully committed.
 
If I buy a Jeep Liberty Sport CRD today with a tag of 33,000 Euros, in addition I am penalized by more than 2000 Euros simply for CO2 tax. Many people have money to buy cars but the government discourages us from buying and thus puts the automobile industry in front of a dilemma: who do you want to keep? civil servants or industry workers?
 
I think revision "J" stands for "junk"

Replies to this message:
• ena1512 (Jan 15, 2009 7:56 pm)
  • caribou1 (Jan 16, 2009 1:06 am)

Replying to: steve_ (Jan 13, 2009 8:27 am)

Hello Steve,
 
Yeah, it's the recurring issue whereby the window mysteriously falls into the door. sometimes when the car isn't moving, and other times when your rolling down the highway, at a safe speed of course. But, according to Jeep, this isn't a safety concern, so it won't be recalled. Pretty interesting though.
 
As for the article, that was very interesting indeed. Although, one could certainly argue that the idea of Objectivism that Ayn was referring to, was never allowed to flourish. One of the fundamentals of her theory is the complete separation of politics and economics. Alan Greenspan's intervention throughout his term essentially put the kibosh on this part of the theory, at least I tend to think so. Not to mention we have special interest groups that are allowed to "sway" the "beliefs" of our elected politicians. I think this is one of the most detrimental aspects of our current political landscape. Essentially, we have made public office a mockery and have allowed ourselves to be ruled by folks that do not necessarily have anything further than their bank accounts in their best interests. Now, I digress . I appreciate the discourse Steve. Have a good one, and perhaps one day we will all be able to get rid of the cars that we probably paid too much for in the beginning anyway.

Replying to: caribou1 (Jan 13, 2009 9:02 am)

Replies to this message:
• caribou1 (Jan 16, 2009 1:06 am)

Replying to: ena1512 (Jan 15, 2009 7:56 pm)

When CO2 becomes a threat, we reduce everything that produces CO2; if we pay a CO2 tax, then it becomes a source of revenue.
 
We had an automobile tax proportional to the size of the engine; it was meant to assist elderly people. This tax was removed at the time life expectancy increased significantly
 
Perhaps removing the CO2 tax and helping people to upgrade their vehicles to use an equivalent to 'Blue-tech' (urea) technology could be a viable option. Our Jeeps could then run with their windows open (LOL)

Replies to this message:
• Fldragonfly (Jan 28, 2009 1:39 pm)
  • albayb (Jan 28, 2009 6:45 pm)
    • Fldragonfly (Jan 29, 2009 6:29 am) and 2 more...
    • felines (Feb 10, 2009 7:24 pm) and 1 more...

Replying to: techc (Jan 27, 2009 5:02 pm)

Replies to this message:
• albayb (Jan 28, 2009 6:45 pm)
  • Fldragonfly (Jan 29, 2009 6:29 am)
    • albayb (Jan 29, 2009 5:58 pm) and 1 more...
  • felines (Feb 10, 2009 7:24 pm)
    • tuffy3 (Feb 24, 2009 5:12 am)

Replying to: Fldragonfly (Jan 28, 2009 1:39 pm)

Replies to this message:
• Fldragonfly (Jan 29, 2009 6:29 am)
  • albayb (Jan 29, 2009 5:58 pm)
    • Fldragonfly (Jan 30, 2009 5:58 am)
• felines (Feb 10, 2009 7:24 pm)
  • tuffy3 (Feb 24, 2009 5:12 am)

Replying to: albayb (Jan 28, 2009 6:45 pm)

Replies to this message:
• albayb (Jan 29, 2009 5:58 pm)
  • Fldragonfly (Jan 30, 2009 5:58 am)

Replying to: Fldragonfly (Jan 29, 2009 6:29 am)

Unfortunately I don't have a physical address because I just went through the website, but here's the address that the response came from
customerassistrechrysler.com
 
Hope that helps!

Replies to this message:
• Fldragonfly (Jan 30, 2009 5:58 am)