- #498 of 617
-
2009 Murano Problems
by mom2gr8girl
-
May 15, 2009 (6:39 pm)
-
|
I was one of the 1st 09's on the road in my area. I have had 5 Nissan's in the past 3 years and have loved everyone of them. I have always wanted a Murano but the price was a little high.
In December 07 we were in a car accident and the lady that hit us head-on ended up supplying us with the funds for the Murano! 
I have had it 1 year and 3 months and I HATE IT!
I have had electrical problems after electrical problem. So bad that the Radio turns on by itself. The key being in the house! 
I am currently fighting with Nissan because they do not know what is wrong with it and I am tired of being stranded because this car that I have always wanted, will not start at times!!! 
Is anyone else having Electrical problems or is it just my dumb luck??
|
- #499 of 617
-
2009 murano fuel question
by jgraminski
-
May 16, 2009 (6:02 am)
-
|
|
I noticed the manual "recomends" 91octane. Has anyone noticed reduced performance with 87?
|
- #500 of 617
-
Re: 2009 murano fuel question [jgraminski]
by jayrider
-
May 16, 2009 (6:15 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: jgraminski (May 16, 2009 6:02 am)
Since I drive conservatively -- no fast starts or hard accelerations- I have no complaints with regular gas.
|
- #501 of 617
-
Re: 2009 murano fuel question [jgraminski]
by mom2gr8girl
-
May 16, 2009 (8:51 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: jgraminski (May 16, 2009 6:02 am)
I have noticed 4 more miles to the gallon on the highway. In town not a big difference.
|
- #502 of 617
-
Re: 2009 murano fuel question [jgraminski]
by reddevil4
-
May 17, 2009 (5:58 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: jgraminski (May 16, 2009 6:02 am)
I have used 87 octane in my 2009 Murano since the the start and I haven't notice any sluggish performance or pinging. I notice on one of the replies back to you that somebody said they got 4 more miles to the gallion by using 91 octane. So I have to make a trip to Utah next week so I am going to try a tank full of each octane and see if there is a difference.
|
- #503 of 617
-
Re: Wind Noise Revisisted... [pasell3]
by a1m1o1
-
May 17, 2009 (10:47 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: pasell3 (Mar 11, 2009 5:28 pm)
I also have the tapping sound coming from the bottom part of the windshield (2009 SL FWD). It's just about the only thing wrong with my car, but it drives me crazy. It seems to go away when the windshield is wet and the wipers are turned on a couple of times. If you figure out the issue, please post the answer. i'll do the same.
|
- #504 of 617
-
Re: Wind Noise Revisisted... [a1m1o1]
by kjsmitty
-
May 17, 2009 (6:04 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: a1m1o1 (May 17, 2009 10:47 am)
It is the black plastic part (on the outside of the window) down by the wipers that sits against the window. Many have just removed and strategically placed a few pieces of felt etc. I would point it out to the dealer and have them do it.
Cheers
|
- #505 of 617
-
Re: 2009 murano fuel question [reddevil4]
by jgraminski
-
May 18, 2009 (8:43 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: reddevil4 (May 17, 2009 5:58 am)
Let me know how that test goes. The reason I posted the question was becuase when I first purchased the vehicle it seemed to be a bit more responsive on that first tank from the dealer. The next fill I noticed a slight reduction in acceleration when I used 87. Maybe my imagination who knows. I also don't know what kind of gas they used at the dealer.
I am still on the second tank of gas and was thinking of trying 91 on my next fill up. I've owned the car now for just a few weeks.
thanks for your responce,
John
|
- #506 of 617
-
Re: purchasing new murano [Crochetlady]
by dennisg
-
May 19, 2009 (4:41 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: Crochetlady (May 01, 2009 5:48 am)
My wife and I just bought a beautiful new 2009 two days ago from a Nissan dealer near Tacoma, WA. It's an LE model, equipped with everything except nav. We paid $33k, and couldn't be happier with the car.
|
- #507 of 617
-
Re: 2009 murano fuel question [jgraminski]
by reddevil4
-
May 27, 2009 (9:49 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: jgraminski (May 18, 2009 8:43 am)
I just got back from my Utah trip and tried the 87 octane and 91 octane. I got one more mile to the gallon with the 91 octane thats all, but I have to admit by the time I tried the 91 octane i was in the middle of Nevada and driving at 80 miles an hour and not 65 miles per hour. Maybe if I would of drove both octanes at 65 maybe the 91 octane would have gotten 3 or 4 miles to the gallon. I'll be honest with you though I didn't notice any better pickup or performance with the 91 octane so I think I will just stay with the 87 octane.
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs 
