Last post on Feb 14, 2008 at 3:37 AM
You are in the Acura RDX
What is this discussion about?
Acura RDX, SUV
#16 of 20 Re: RDX v. Nissan Rogue [wwest]
Feb 12, 2008 (7:22 pm)
The Rogue was not tested. I also noted the video cut out the disclaimer about real world driving condtions versus the test. That being said IF I had to deal with snow and ice a Subaru would get a lot of consideration. I drive fwd in my area so the point irelavant to me.
#17 of 20 Re: RDX v. Nissan Rogue [furb21]
Feb 13, 2008 (9:37 am)
Since the Roque can never apportion more than 30% of the engine torque to the rear the video has importance.
#18 of 20 Re: RDX v. Nissan Rogue [wwest]
Feb 13, 2008 (1:03 pm)
Get your facts straight man....
2008 Nissan Rogue AWD
From a Stand Still: 50% Front and 50% Rear.
While Driving: Front Wheel Drive Only.
Cornering: 30% Rear and 70% Front.
The Video was hype. You must be a Subaru sales person......
#19 of 20 Re: RDX v. Nissan Rogue [mlmcgahee]
Feb 13, 2008 (7:23 pm)
No, retired, computer manufacturing/sales.
I thought that I got that directly from the Nissan site, I'll go back and look.
Lexus fan here.
And no, the video seems true to the facts to me.