Sign In Join 



2008 Mazda CX-9

69 messages,  Last post on Jul 12, 2009 at 10:20 AM

You are in the Mazda CX-9 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mazda CX-9, SUV


Messages Page 2 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#10 of 69
Active Torque Split AWD by batman47
Nov 25, 2007 (1:39 pm)
Reply
The active split all-wheel drive is an option in the CX-9 brochure. Does the price MSRP $34,655 include this option or the dealer will ask me to pay another $1,000, for example to have this option on?
#11 of 69
Re: Active Torque Split AWD [batman47] by aviboy97
Nov 26, 2007 (3:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: batman47 (Nov 25, 2007 1:39 pm)

$34,655 is the MSRP of the Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring AWD, less any additional options, less $635 destination, and less any local, state, or dealer charges.
#13 of 69
Re: Blind Spot Monitioring System [topneuro] by c_bag
Dec 06, 2007 (7:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: topneuro (Nov 13, 2007 11:52 am)

I purchased a 08 CX-9 GT AWD the day before Thanksgiving, and have been driving the vehicle and noting the performance of the BSMS, and I would have to say that it's dead on, there are instances where the system can be a little cautious, but I'd rather it be proactive than not at all. The system hasn't thrown out any false alerts, additionally the BSMS is an option that can be deactivated via the button below the steering wheel to the left. I don't have the Nav option maybe someone else can answer that question for u. I will say one note about the integreted NAV system. The factory install Nav systems are predominately used for more than just NAV, many of these system are imbedded into the cars functionality ie, audio/visual controls, vehicle monitoring of convenience and critical functions, and many other functions. The problem with this is if that Nav display or the unit itself gets damaged then it places you at an expensive disadvantage, and you will be flying blind not having access to those functions controlled by the navigation system.
#14 of 69
2008 CX-9 Reliability by zippydriver
Dec 29, 2007 (9:58 pm)
Reply
does anyone know currently the reliability and resale issue of the Mazda CX-9?
I love the drive of the car and wish to purchase it but am concerned about consumer reports note about reliability and poor resale.
Did Mazda fix the sound system issue, Navi issue & long stopping distance on the 2008? and what is the resale of these cars?
 
is there a new model coming out in 2009 also, and if so, will this be much different and when will it come out?
 
love the car but don't want to buy something with a big headache. have a 2001 MB ML430 right now and have had nightmare repair issues. can't afford time nor money of another dud car.
 
please advise, hoping to decide by 1/2/08 for the 0% interest rate
#15 of 69
Re: 2008 CX-9 Reliability [zippydriver] by nxs138
Dec 30, 2007 (7:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: zippydriver (Dec 29, 2007 9:58 pm)

When it comes to braking distances, I'd rather look at magazines that do comparisons, since these tend to be on the same day/same conditions. So on Motor Trend, when they compared the 2007 CX-9 to the MDX and the Acadia, here were the numbers: (from 60 to 0 mph):
 
MDX: 121 feet
CX-9: 123 feet
Acadia: 138 feet
 
As far as reliability, truedelta.com is another useful source where owners have reported in on issues. Out of 100 vehicles, the 2007 CX-9 had 54 trips to the shop, the Acadia had 98, and the MDX had 48. So the Acadia was problem-prone in its first year, and the CX-9 was average.
 
If you look at the CR reliability data, you'll see that the CX-9 mostly gets full red circles (good), while the Acadia/Outlook get plenty of half circles (average). The CX-9 had only one black circle for Audio Systems, and that seems to drive the low reliability? I believe the issue here is the way CR weighs the black circles.
 
In any case, the audio system in the CX-9 is a bit funky. The voice-recognition on the NAV can be spotty, and you need a dealer-installed adapter if you want to run an iPOD on a satellite-radio equipped system (why couldn't they build it into the stereo system?) Apart from that, people seem to like the way the stereo sounds.
 
Resale value? Not sure. Mazdas in general tend to do okay in the last few years (the Mazda 3 holds 35% of its resale value after 5 years, which is industry average). The CX-9 did win the Motor Trend award, so that should help.
#16 of 69
Re: 2008 CX-9 Reliability [nxs138] by zippydriver
Dec 30, 2007 (7:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: nxs138 (Dec 30, 2007 7:28 am)

zippydriver, thanks for the info.
 
some think that's its not worth $ for navi system. currently have navi system in car (MB ML430) and like it fixed and not have to play around with it. do i have to stop to change destination always except for hospital? and if that is the case, would a cheaper hand held make more sense/be more use? I use it by putting in addresses to work related things usually and use it quite a bit.
 
ie do you think it's worth it for the navi system?
 
and in regards to reliability, does mazda give you a loaner if car goes in or do i have to wait for some time/halfday/etc at the shop for the repair? does anyone have any comments about how the service is at the local mazda dealers (I am by the Smithtown, NY one)?
 
and CR had the drive train as an issue, anyone know what this was for?
 
thanks
#17 of 69
Re: 2008 CX-9 Reliability [zippydriver] by unixxus
Dec 30, 2007 (9:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: zippydriver (Dec 30, 2007 7:56 am)

and in regards to reliability, does mazda give you a loaner if car goes in or do i have to wait for some time/halfday/etc at the shop for the repair?
 
Mazda provides you with a loaner vehicle if your car is in the shop for warranty related services as well as free road side assistance. I am not aware of any drive train issues relating to the CX-9. As far as resale value, the CX-9 has been on the market for less than a year making it harder to judge its resale value.
#18 of 69
Re: 2008 CX-9 Reliability [zippydriver] by ceric
Dec 31, 2007 (2:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: zippydriver (Dec 30, 2007 7:56 am)

I think CR should apologize to Mazda on the long stopping distance claim.
Everywhere you check with any automobile magzines, you will find them praise CX-9 for outstanding braking. CR is the only exception. Anyway, I only read CR for their reliability data. I don't know why people bother to read their "testing" or "reviews". If you were the expert in testing automobiles, which magzine would you work for? CR or CarAndDriver, MotorTrend, Automobile or RoadAndTrack?
 
On the issue with tranny, from what I read, it was a typical 1st year issue. Tranny fluid comes half filled from factory (I wonder why? Like they over-inflat the tires for transportation?). At the dealerships, they have to fill it up before sales. However, the new Aisin 6-speed uses special fluid than conventional. Some mechnics filled it with WRONG fluid causing the tranny to seize up.
 
Ford-Mazda 3.7L DOHC engine is very good. The Aisin 6-speed tranny is top notch. I wouldn't worry about the power-train, if Mazda had chosen Ford's tranny, I would be worried...
 
Reliability wise, 2nd year model sould be much better than the 1st. Almost every company have to recall their 1st year vehicle. My Prius has been recalled TWICE and it was a 2nd year vehicle (a 2005, 2004 being the 1st). Note also that the CX-9 is made in Japan (I am stating a fact. Take it for whatever it is worth to you...)
 
Resale: Well, I think you can't beat Honda in resale value. I don't know about Mazda.
 
I am one of the guys who is comparing Honda Pilot and Mazda CX-9. The new Pilot is coming out in May, 2008. Prototype to be shown in Detriot Autoshow in Jan, 2008.
#19 of 69
Re: 2008 CX-9 Reliability [ceric] by zippydriver
Dec 31, 2007 (10:15 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ceric (Dec 31, 2007 2:29 am)

Hi
 
I am also comparing the Mazda CX-9 to the hopefully new Honda Pilot in 2008. I looked at the Mazda when Honda did not release the new pilot in 2007.
 
my current car is not doing well (MB ML430 2001) so I have been looking elsewhere. I am considering possibly waiting for the new Honda Pilot or buying the Mazda CX-9 now. I test drove the Acura MDX (too much electronics and car for $), audi (too expensive) Honda CRV (too small and not enough power), subaru, INfiniti, etc and really really liked the drive of teh Mazda especially for the $.
 
thanks for the data on Honda, I spoke to dealer 2 days ago and they did not have release date. will continue to look, but will decide within next 2+/- months or less on what car. just put lots of $ in my current car (breaks, electronics,etc) and considering driving it to get out what I put in .

Messages Page 2 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement