Sign In Join 



2008 Mazda CX-9

69 messages,  Last post on Jul 12, 2009 at 10:20 AM

You are in the Mazda CX-9 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mazda CX-9, SUV


Messages Page 4 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#22 of 69
Re: Short term road test review [pulleydog] by mdhutton
Jan 20, 2008 (3:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pulleydog (Jan 18, 2008 7:37 pm)

What an insightful post! Let's see...
 
Wind noise: I just can't say whether not having the rails on my car makes it any quieter.
 
You really told us a lot there.
 
Sound system: I also decided against the Bose / Moonroof package
 
Most CX-9 owners will opt for this package, so some information would be helpful.
 
Gas mileage: I do notice a significant drop in mileage when I am 'in-town'.
 
Yup...most cars do that.
 
Fit / Finish: I don't think I've read any complaints about the interior door handles on the CX9, but having known about the poor job Ford did with the door handles in the '06 Explorer (which is why we got the '07) I do think the front door handles could have been designed better.
 
Let's see...no real complaints, but Ford made a bad one at one time, so you found it necessary to offer a fix to a problem that doesn't exist.
 
I can just imagine what it would be like to have kids back there - swinging open those doors and hitting the cars parked next to them - yikes! Some type of protection for your doors (and for the cars next to you) would seem to be almost a necessity.
 
Or you could teach your passengers to be aware of their surroundings and be careful.
 
Driving Experience: I think the issue, therefore, is the overall suspension of this vehicle and not really related to the wheels/tires. If you want to call it a "Sport" ride, go ahead.... I will just call it simply UNCOMFORTABLE when hitting bumps, potholes, expansion joints, etc. The jolts come right through.
 
It IS a "sport" model, just doing what it's supposed to do.
 
I don't remember the test drives being so 'bumpy'.
 
Should have done a better test drive.
 
Acceleration is okay, but you can hear the engine when you put your foot down and I'd rather have a quiet car all the time.
 
Most cars get noiser when they rev higher. Been going on for years.
 
Miscellaneous: I brought my own Mobil-1 0W20 full synthetic oil to be used.
 
Wow! You paid for an oil change AND brought the oil. With the help you're giving the dealer's profit margin, seems they should have tried harder on your programming issues.
 
Keep doing this and you'll erase the $1800 you saved on the Bose/Moonroof package.
 
As I look out at my side mirror, I can always see the reflection of my interior side vent in the mirror. If this area was black, I probably wouldn't even notice it in the mirror. (The reflection is actually off the window) - minor, but annoying.
 
Again, a better test drive would have identified this.
#23 of 69
Re: Short term road test review [mdhutton] by nxs138
Jan 20, 2008 (4:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mdhutton (Jan 20, 2008 3:53 pm)

Wow! You paid for an oil change AND brought the oil.
 
Dealers will typically just let you pay labor if you bring in your own oil (i.e. they won't charge you for their oil). I do this all the time with my car, since the grade they use is not what I like. Of course, you do have to be careful with the bill, since they might charge you for their oil anyway!
#24 of 69
Re: Short term road test review [pulleydog] by etoileb
Jan 21, 2008 (1:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: pulleydog (Jan 18, 2008 7:37 pm)

Pulleydog,
 
Great bit of reviewing. Unlike the others, I'll say thank you for investing the time in keeping us informed. Other posters tend to blow hold or cold, so don't understand when a reviewer can find some middle ground, especially one that's an owner.
 
I have a 08 CX-9 GT, its not perfect by a long chalk for instance, there's something about its beautiful svelte like design that attracts mud. Compared to other black cars, mine always looks filthy even after a wash.
 
The mileage is not great, but hey, anyone buying a 4400 lb vehicle shouldn't have any illusions (I haven't even tried to calculate my MPG, as I know as I'll lie in bed at night breaking sweat trying to work out how to increase it). I'd love to see Mazda borrow Land Rover's 3.6 V8 diesel which (top selling Range Rover in Europe) before Ford sells the unit to the Indian's - then we would get performance with economy.
 
Against this are the countless aspects I love. No car is ever going to be perfect but the CX-9 is pretty darn close.
 
On balance, its a great car (so far) . The test of the pudding is my wife likes driving it against her initial prejudices
#25 of 69
Re: Short term road test review [pulleydog] by aviboy97
Jan 21, 2008 (8:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: pulleydog (Jan 18, 2008 7:37 pm)

I don't think I've read any complaints about the interior door handles on the CX9, but having known about the poor job Ford did with the door handles in the '06 Explorer (which is why we got the '07) I do think the front door handles could have been designed better.
 
These are not Ford door handles, so, I don't really follow you there. Mazda uses those door handles on most all Mazda models, with no complaints I can recolect. Remember, the CX-9 was designed by Mazda, built by Mazda in Japan.
 
I brought my own Mobil-1 0W20 full synthetic oil to be used. I don't know if that will have any affect on the gas mileage, but I'll find out.
 
Your salesman / service manager should have told you Mazda does not recommend full synthetic. I think you will be wasting your hard earned money on oil that only benefits Exxon/Mobils bottom line.
#27 of 69
CX-9 rear world experiences by rocco9
Jan 21, 2008 (3:57 pm)
Reply
Overall I am very please with my 2008 CX-9 Grand Touring AWD. I love the blind spot motoring for my wife. I have owned Lexus, Toyota's, and Ford's in the past. I have 3000 on the car without any issues. I was wondering if any other CX-9 owners have experience excessive water coming out of the mirrors after you wash the car. It makes it difficult to dry you car when water splashes down the side after you drive it. I have tried stick paper towel in behind the mirror, folding the mirrors and drying, even an air compressor to blow the mirror out. Any ideas?
#28 of 69
Re: Short term road test review [aviboy97] by msuvet
Jan 21, 2008 (4:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (Jan 21, 2008 8:53 am)

Your salesman / service manager should have told you Mazda does not recommend full synthetic. I think you will be wasting your hard earned money on oil that only benefits Exxon/Mobils bottom line.
 
Do you mind sharing what they do recommend?
 
No synthetic at all? Part synthetic?
 
Thanks
#29 of 69
Re: Short term road test review [aviboy97] by nxs138
Jan 21, 2008 (5:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (Jan 21, 2008 8:53 am)

You should be able to go much longer between oil changes with synthetic, since it tends to degrade at a slower rate since it has better shear stability and better thermal degradation. I've seen people go 10,000 miles between oil changes with no issues, and by "no issues" I mean that they have sent their used oil to Blackstone lab for analysis and the oil came out great in terms of wear, etc.
  
In any case, synthetic is probably best on a turbo car since that turbo spins like mad. My car is a twin-turbo, so I use synthetic as "insurance". For non-turbo engines that are driven normally, I would tend to agree that mineral oil is just fine.
#30 of 69
Mazda CX-9 VS. the competition by rocco9
Jan 21, 2008 (7:59 pm)
Reply
After looking at many different suvs for my family, I decided to get a CX-9. I originally liked the GMC Acadia, until I sat in one and gave it a once over. I have always enjoyed my Toyotas so I had to go look at the new Highlander. I liked it compared to the Acadia along with its long list of great features. When I saw the CX-9 in my car magazine, I had to go also look at that. After I test drove it, I was very surprised as to how nice a car like this could be. That same day I called my contact at Toyota and arranged a test drive in a Highlander. With my hopes high, I took it off the lot and drove it about one mile. What is Toyota doing? After owning four Toyotas in the past and one Lexus I could not believe how disappointing the Highlander is compared to the CX-9. Has Toyota lost there drive to keep trying since they are the Top Dog? I have never owned a Mazda and hope it is everything I think it will be. After 3000 miles the car is a dream with a few minor irritants. If anyone is thinking of buying one, you have to take a test drive and compare. If any other CX owners have found any great web sites or service issues I would love to hear about it.

Messages Page 4 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement