You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
Inside Line Article Comments
Article Comments - Chrysler Does Some Pruning

31 messages, Last post on Aug 28, 2008 at 5:38 PM
You are in the Inside Line Article Comments Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
Chrysler Does Some Pruning, But Where Are the New Seedlings? - Chrysler announced last week that it is dropping from its product portfolio four slow-selling models. Going away in 2008 will be the Dodge Magnum and the Chrysler Crossfire, Pacifica and PT Cruiser convertible. These are the obvious models to clear away from among the overlapping models in Chrysler's line. (more)
|
I don't think the rebadged Mitsubishis were so bad back in the day (relatively speaking), but the real problems came when Chrysler started using Mitsubishi components in Chrysler cars. Stuff like the 2.6 "Silent Shaft" 4-cyl, or the 3.0 oil burner V-6. But I think the more recent Mitsu products are okay, and I think their engines are pretty good nowadays. I'd really like to see Chrysler come up with something decent to replace the Avenger/Sebring. I think these cars are just a mess inside and out, style-wise, and I don't think there's anything spectacular about the way they perform. The 300C/Charger are getting a bit outdated, and with the way fuel prices are, they're a bit of a throwback. But I still like them. It would be cool if Chrysler would keep them around, as sort of a niche product for those who want them, but then come out with something to replace the Avenger/Sebring that would be a good contender for the Accord, Camry, Malibu, Altima, etc market. |
|
|
Replying to: writer (Aug 25, 2008 2:15 pm) Chrysler is a very different company and so is Mitsubishi. What was done in the 80's and 90's cannot work with these two companies now. Plus Nissan has a wider reach and better technology to utilize. Either way, I still think Chrysler is destined to become a member of the Nissan/Renault family.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dtownfb (Aug 26, 2008 6:34 pm) I think that's the only way for Chryco to survive. Unless there's some super secret development going on from a depleted engineering dept, that's the best thing that can happen to them. It's a shame really. They were in good shape before Daimler stepped in with their so called "merger of equals. Daimler drained their, at the time, sizable cash on hand. They stuck Chrysler with old Mercedes parts. Then they blamed Chrysler for their own malaise. Unceremoniously, they dumped them. Jeep brand is one that's out of favor right now via their fuel economy. Dodge is putting out uninspired products, with the possible exception of the Challenger. Chrysler has aging designs, for the most part....300, PT. Sebring is relatively new, but who wants them. Without resources like what Nissan/Renault has, how do they possibly get out of this mess? A merger is their only way to survive.
|
|
|
Replying to: graphicguy (Aug 28, 2008 5:53 am) It's sad but American businesses (big business) tend to set their model based on the best years and not prepare for the lean years. And the Big 3 has no vision what so ever. they bet the farm on SUVs and pickups and allowed the imports to control the car market. Sad but I don't think Chrysler will be the only US automaker to go down. Every time I think GM is in the clear, their quarterly reports bring me back to reality. The next two quarters should be interesting...... |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
Inside Line Article Comments
Article Comments - Chrysler Does Some Pruning
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats