You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Article Comments - Comparison Test: 2007-2008 Sport Sedans

475 messages, Last post on Jul 25, 2008 at 4:41 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
Comparison Test: 2007-2008 Sport Sedans - This is exactly why we gathered this group of sport sedans. That is, to find out if the 2008 Cadillac CTS, 2007 Infiniti G35 Sport, 2008 Lexus IS 350 or 2008 Mercedes-Benz C350 Sport can topple the Bavarian champ — the 2007 BMW 335i. In the spirit of the segment, each car in the test is outfitted with sport package hardware — usually a stiffer suspension and bigger wheels and tires — and an automatic transmission. (more)
|
Replying to: hondacura4 (Nov 05, 2007 3:22 pm) Agree that free maintenance BMW is offering is hard to overlook since no other cars in this segment (maybe MB does this but I am not sure) come with this. However, come to think of it, 4 years/50K miles for a BMW means 3 (at most 4) oil changes and probably 1 tune up. How much does BMW dealers charge for oil change now? |
|
|
Replying to: louiswei (Nov 05, 2007 3:32 pm) Also includes brakes and the "option" of upgrading your service (better oil etc.). Getting an appointment is sometimes harder than non-free maintenance because the service department makes more on customer paid service plus they might not have a loaner. Not that I've been through this or know any BMW mechanics - NOT! Both BMW and MB (especially MB) also give you the opportunity to spend some quality time in their service departments fixing warranty repairs. It's free except for their premium cafes and my time. |
|
|
Replying to: ashguy22 (Nov 05, 2007 12:57 pm) What if I want the best sports sedan for under $39K? I'm guessing that maybe a $50K car should probably be better than a $50K car!? There's only so much I'm willing to spend for that badge. |
|
|
Replying to: kdshapiro (Nov 04, 2007 5:28 pm) Now keep in mind I'm not talking about the extremely knowledgeable Edmund's forum authors! I'm referring to the average Joe (and Joanne) who buys a large majority of these cars.
|
|
I love both cars, but the GT-R is coming!
|
|
|
Replying to: louiswei (Nov 05, 2007 3:32 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: drtravel (Nov 05, 2007 4:04 pm) What is your perception of the American buying public's perception of these vehicles. Most peoples opinions are influenced by what they see, experience and read.
|
|
|
Replying to: matts2000 (Nov 05, 2007 4:48 pm) "Sedan" = 4 doors. G37 and GT-R don't qualify. And while we are off topic, I see that the GT-R is closer to my former Isuzu Trooper in weight than it is to my current 911 or previous 4 door Maxima. IMO, Nissan's 350Z is a grossly overweight and underwhelming sports car in the $30k range. They should fix that before trying to tackle the serious/exotic level with a nearly 2 ton, Mattel Toy inspired obese behemouth. Is anybody around that remembers the 240Z? That was a true ground-up winner of a sports car for its day. Now you just have high-HP, low-IQ muscleheads in charge.
|
|
|
Replying to: louiswei (Nov 05, 2007 3:32 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: drewsrx (Nov 05, 2007 1:58 pm) I think you are giving a lot of credit to manumatics where it isn't due. "Rev matching" on downshifts doesn't mean phoohey when there is still a noticable overall engagement hesitation on downshifts. That's the case with the SLK55 I drove last week - do you want to suggest something better I should try? And I may not be the best at articulating this, but I have never found even the better SMG's (M3) to give me the feel and direct control that I want and enjoy. I'm no Tiger Woods. But I'll go out on the course, play from the tips and take my score. It sounds like some folks would rather cart an "Iron Byron" robot onto the course to hit the ball for them. That's fine, and they might score pretty well, but that's simply not a "sport" by my definition. It takes every ounce of technology that Ferrari can muster to get an F1 SMG transmissioned 430 to nearly match the performance of their 430 6-speed manual. That's a transmission that costs about $10,000. Nothing that BMW, Mercedes/AMG, Infiniti or even Porsche currently has even comes close. So I respectfully submit that when we are comparing "sport" sedans or sports cars, the less expensive, but human controlled manual transmission is still the standard that should be used. If somebody then wants to replace "sport" with the "convenience" of a manumatic, that's their perogative. P.S. See my previous post about the GT-R. As a two ton 2-seater, it should not be used for validating anything, IMO.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Article Comments - Comparison Test: 2007-2008 Sport Sedans
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Cadillac CTS
2010 BMW 3 Series
2008 Infiniti G35
1991 Mercedes-Benz 350-Class
2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats