Sign In Join 



Nissan Rogue Real World MPG

100 messages,  Last post on Dec 05, 2008 at 6:34 AM

You are in the Nissan Rogue Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Nissan Rogue, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), SUV


Messages Page 8 of 11
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#66 of 100
Gas Guzzler by kenn2
Aug 12, 2008 (1:47 pm)
Reply
13000 miles on my Nissan Roug AWD
I have complained about the gas milage since the start, Nissan Service Dep. stated since there was no trouble light on the dash panel there was nothing wrong with the car.
Long story short, my Rouge is now at Nissan getting the transmition replaced.
#67 of 100
Re: Gas Guzzler [kenn2] by captain2
Aug 13, 2008 (6:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: kenn2 (Aug 12, 2008 1:47 pm)

stated since there was no trouble light on the dash panel there was nothing wrong with the car
how stupid this sounds! - we're degenerating into a bunch of mindless idiots that look to a silly computer for answers to everything - and your Nissan Service techs are apparently in front of the line!
Ultimately this sounds logical though - if your tranny is 'slipping' somehow (or if the tranny computer) is selecting gear ratios that are too high - FE would be effected. The question is, of course, why those 'trained' service techs wouldn't have been able to diagnose this with a simple test drive It's not like Nissan hasn't built a CVT before.
My Rogue (SL AWD) manages 25+ mpg overall (60% highway), runs great, and can turn as low as 2100 rpm at 70. Sorry to hear about your problems and would be interested to know if the tranny replacement is the real fix.
#68 of 100
Re: Gas Guzzler [captain2] by kenn2
Aug 13, 2008 (7:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (Aug 13, 2008 6:34 am)

I saved your reply and will let you know, I am hoping to get 25+ mpg as well.
#69 of 100
re:MPG by goroad1
Aug 22, 2008 (6:24 am)
Reply
With our 3 week old loaded SL AWD Rogue our worst Hwy mileage was 25mpg driving somewhat agressivly around 65-70 mph.
Driving in light traffic 55-60mph (DC Area) I averaged 29.2mpg,,keeeping the RPM's below 2k really made a difference in the mileage and possibly the engine and drive train breaking in as well.
#70 of 100
re:MPG [goroad1] by phil53
Aug 23, 2008 (2:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: goroad1 (Aug 22, 2008 6:24 am)

Thanks; that's good information. Around here (KC area), 65-70 isn't really seen as aggressive - unless you're in a 55 zone. 60 to 70 is the speed limit on most highways. Driving to work, I generally run 70 -75 on the highway portions of my commute. But 25 mpg isn't bad. That's about what I'm hearing about the Forester too.
#71 of 100
re:MPG [phil53] by captain2
Aug 25, 2008 (5:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: phil53 (Aug 23, 2008 2:52 pm)

I am also seeing 25+ mpg overall (SL AWD) - about 60% highway and also at higher (75+) highway speeds. The engine turns right at 2200-2300 rpm at 70. Have a friend with a 06 Forester and he averages about the same albeit with a higher percentage highway. Think that overall the Rogue does a bit better FE wise and is a bit quicker acceleration wise all probably because of the CVT.
#72 of 100
re:MPG by lindaw2
Aug 25, 2008 (8:45 am)
Reply
I've had my 2008 Rogue for about 2 weeks and do almost all city driving. I am getting 23MPG's. Maybe that is as good as it is going to get without the highway miles?
#73 of 100
re:MPG [lindaw2] by captain2
Aug 25, 2008 (12:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lindaw2 (Aug 25, 2008 8:45 am)

although your FE should improve very slightly as the engine 'loosens up' I would tell you that 23 mpg overall in the City is quite good.
#74 of 100
re:MPG [captain2] by phil53
Aug 25, 2008 (4:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (Aug 25, 2008 5:45 am)

That is quite interesting. This is actually the first time I've seen any evidence that the Rogue gets better fuel mileage than the Forester. I agree that, with the CVT (vs. the 4AT), the Rogue should get better fuel mileage than the Forester. I can tell you that it does seem to accelerate better and shifts (with the paddles) very quickly and crisply. The transmission is probably the Forester's weak point. Thanks.
#75 of 100
re:MPG [phil53] by captain2
Aug 26, 2008 (9:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: phil53 (Aug 25, 2008 4:50 pm)

an aside - it is that 'electronically controlled/ learning ' Forester tranny that he had to take back to the dealer to get reprogrammed - the car was developing a helluva hesitation problem. The TSB did work though, haven't heard any further complaints.

Messages Page 8 of 11
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement