Sign In Join 



GM News, New Models and Market Share

8375 messages,  Last post on Nov 24, 2009 at 7:14 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 809 of 839
1
...
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
...
839
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#8074 of 8375
a weekend in a Terrain by steve_ HOST
Nov 11, 2009 (10:27 am)
Reply
"In fact, from a demographic point-of-view I'm pretty well centered in the GMC Terrain's gun sights as far as target buyers go. And guess what? I could absolutely see myself buying one instead of the competition. Does that statement surprise you? Me too.
 
It's interesting, because there's plenty of hard data to suggest GM is making progress. Market share seems to have finally leveled off, and the destructive combination of bloated inventory and incentive spending no longer drives pricing or vehicle sales."
 
Is GM Actually Going to Pull Off a Successful Turnaround? (Karl on Cars)
#8075 of 8375
Re: a weekend in a Terrain [steve_] by cooterbfd
Nov 11, 2009 (1:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Nov 11, 2009 10:27 am)

"......It's interesting, because there's plenty of hard data to suggest GM is making progress. Market share seems to have finally leveled off, and the destructive combination of bloated inventory and incentive spending no longer drives pricing or vehicle sales."
 
What is also impressive is that the newer vehicles (Lacrosse, Equinox, Terrain, SRX, Malibu, CTS, and the Lambda CUV's) are all selling well. It is the holdovers like the DTS and Lucerne and Impala that need incentives to move.
#8076 of 8375
Re: a weekend in a Terrain [cooterbfd] by circlew
Nov 11, 2009 (4:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Nov 11, 2009 1:00 pm)

Look at the top sellers to see who is leading market share. The Impala and the Malibu are no. 12 and 15, respectively on the top 20 top sellers in October. The Chevy Traverse showed up on the list at No. 19 last month, which is impressive.
 
The Fusion and the Focus were 11 and 17 respectively. The rest are are the 3 trucks from F (#1 of 20) and GM (#2 and #16 of 20), the Escape, Dodge Ram, Jetta and Legacy.
 
The Asians round out the other 8 in 3rd through 11th place on the Top 20 list.
 
The Terrain and Equinox were never top sellers although the redesigns make the old models worthless, afaic. The CR-V (#7 of 20) and RAV-4 (#9 of 20) sold a combined 179,000 units YTD Oct. No chance that GM can come close to those numbers for quite some time.
 
That says that the U.S. manufacturers need to work extremely hard to make cars that people will buy regardless of the hot air blown at the consumers. The best cars are winning!
 
Regards,
OW
#8077 of 8375
Re: GM cars unique to one of their 4 brands [andre1969] by oldcem
Nov 11, 2009 (9:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 11, 2009 6:56 am)

Mine is an 08 Aura XE 3.5. I've put 41K business miles on her so far with no problems. She's a decent performer and gets excellent fuel economy as well.
 
Regards:
OldCEM
#8078 of 8375
Re: GM cars unique to one of their 4 brands [ingvar] by oldcem
Nov 11, 2009 (9:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ingvar (Nov 11, 2009 6:15 am)

I really like European cars as well. My Saturn's stablemate is a Jaguar S-Type 4.2.
 
Regards:
OldCEM
#8079 of 8375
Re: GM cars unique to one of their 4 brands [andre1969] by lemko
Nov 12, 2009 (6:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 11, 2009 6:56 am)

I had a friend who was burnt by a bad 2000 VW Jetta and traded it at a loss for a 2001 Saturn S-Series. Never heard a complaint about his Saturn.
#8080 of 8375
Re: GM cars unique to one of their 4 brands [elias] by m4d_cow
Nov 12, 2009 (6:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: elias (Nov 11, 2009 4:55 am)

Well, you're the one who brought this up again. GM does make money on Escalade. But is Escalade by itself a decent car? Not to many, there's more hype than actual worth in an Escalade. How much money they make isn't related to the fact that Escalade is Tahoe's clone with fancier dress and bigger engine.
 
To answer your other question, here's what I think:
1. For starter uniqueness will regain consumer confidence who're sick of clones, plus it will relieve GM from it's current image. Better consumer confidence leads to better sales.
 
2. GM can invest more money on creating worthy new products with the money it wastes on rebadging, re-skining, etc for it's clones. Sure, such money may not seem much at first, but with so many clones GM has I bet there'll be plenty of cash to spare if the clones are killed.
 
To me, all those points lead to better GM, better products, and better sales. What do you think?
#8081 of 8375
Re: GM cars unique to one of their 4 brands [cooterbfd] by m4d_cow
Nov 12, 2009 (6:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Nov 11, 2009 9:07 am)

Gee, and how is this different from the clones/twins at Toyota, Honda, or Nissan?? Or Hyundai/Kia??
 
Hmm? What makes you think it's any different?
 
Clones by itself can be an ok thing or a bad thing. OTOH the difference is already stated by Andre, and IMO there's either:
1. A substantial step up between the clones, like what you see from Camry-ES350 (although I still consider ES as borderline cloning)
2. The badge jobs aren't sold in the same market (or to be exact, in the same country).
 
In this case, I don't see Equinox being sold in Europe as Opel Captiva and in Korea as Daewoo Winstorm as a negative thing. But selling a guised up Equinox under the name SRX is a problem in my book. If, for example, Saturn is still alive and Gm sells another Equinox under the Vue name, that's a problem in my book as well.
 
OTOH I agree with british_rover, I don't see XLR as a Vette clone, a platform mate, I say.
#8082 of 8375
Re: GM cars unique to one of their 4 brands [lemko] by dieselone
Nov 12, 2009 (7:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Nov 12, 2009 6:31 am)

I had a friend who was burnt by a bad 2000 VW Jetta and traded it at a loss for a 2001 Saturn S-Series. Never heard a complaint about his Saturn.
 
Having owned a 2000 Jetta and have owned a SL-2 Saturn, all I can say is they are apples and oranges as a 2000 Jetta is 10x the car any S series could even dream to be. Anyone who can be satisfied with an SL-2 must have very low standards. What a horrible car. Now maybe if all you care about is getting from point A to B then it does the job. As far as reliability, maybe a 2000 S series is more reliable overall, but quality, fit-n-finish, ride, and handling are on a whole different level with the Jetta.
 
That said, my personal sample of friends and family that have owned both VW's and Saturns is quite high. In my sample their are about 5 vw's to 5 or so S and SC series Saturns. Not one Saturn owner purchased another Saturn after owing one, but all but one of the VW owners bought another VW, except for 1, who is me. I'd buy another VW in a heartbeat. My SIL and a good friend of mine both returned '98 & 00 SC-1 because of build quality issues. My SIL's had a trans leak Saturn couldn't fix after 3 tries and my friend's had that stupid 3rd suicide style door that leaked water into the car when ever it rained and sounded like the window was open when over 50mph and once again Saturn couldn't fix it. My MIL's '95 SL-2 started leaking trans fluid at 50k and she just lived with it since the repair was expensive. My wife's '92 SL-2 burned a quart of oil ever 250-500 miles by the time it had 65k miles on it and Saturn told me that was normal and they wouldn't do anything about, so much for the extended warranty and we never touched another Saturn. Guess we weren't alone.
 
 I'd rather drive a car I thoroughly enjoy even with reliability issues over a lousy designed car that is 100% reliable. I'd take a Jetta that was in the shop every few months over any S-series that was guaranteed to go 200k w/o a single problem.
 
traded it at a loss
 
LOL, Lemko, who are you kidding. GM is the king of trade in at a loss. The 2000 Jetta TDI I owned was purchased for $21k. I put 35k miles on it and sold it in 2001 for $17,500. That's pretty damn good in my book, what GM car in the last 10 years would even come close to that, maybe a few corvette models, but certainly not any Malibu, Impala, or any other lousy Saturn of that era.
#8083 of 8375
Re: GM cars unique to one of their 4 brands [dieselone] by lemko
Nov 12, 2009 (7:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: dieselone (Nov 12, 2009 7:11 am)

I'd rather have a crude car that gets me to work and back versus the most exquisitely built and best performing car that leaves me stranded or sits dead in my driveway. You must have a lot of time on your hands, let alone a lot of spare cash, if you could stand any car that would be in the shop that many times. If the car was so great, why did you trade it after a year? Either it was troublesome or you have enough cash to buy a new car every year. I will give the Jetta one credit - it had a much nicer interior than a Saturn of the same era.

Messages Page 809 of 839
1
...
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
...
839
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement