Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views GM News, New Models and Market Share
8511 messages, Last post on Nov 29, 2009 at 11:30 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: elias (Nov 10, 2009 2:15 pm) I see CTS, STS, Camaro, G8, Corvette as unique to each brand, but the others? |
|
|
Replying to: m4d_cow (Nov 11, 2009 3:04 am) The meta-question in this forum appears to be how uniqueness-to-a-single-GM-brand will affect new models and market share - what do you think about that? By having a Caddy version "Escalade" - doesn't GM make big-$ from folks willing to pay for extra plastic panels and shiny chrome-looking plastic bling on a Suburban?
|
|
|
Replying to: oldcem (Nov 10, 2009 9:01 pm) Same for me, no more Hondas  Riding German "horse" 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: elias (Nov 10, 2009 2:15 pm) The G5 and the Cobalt were badge engineering. The XLR and the Vette aren't. They use platform sharing. All unique body work for both models and all unique powertrain for both models. Wasn't the XLR only avaliable as a hardtop convertible? If someone thinks the XLR and the Vette are badge engineering then Audi and VWs whole line is also badge engineering by the same standard. Hey you could say some Bentleys are just badge engineered Audis using that standard. |
|
|
Replying to: oldcem (Nov 10, 2009 9:01 pm) I have some friends, a married couple, who were burned by a 1994 Civic. And I'm convinced that the reason the car was so bad was because I recommended it to them!  At the time, they wanted a small, economical car, and I figured it was the best thing going at the time. After about 4 years and 80-90,000 miles, it had blown two head gaskets and needed a/c work. They ended up replacing it with a Saturn S-series. This was in the fall of '98, so it could've been a '99 or leftover '98. I don't know how that worked out for them, though. I haven't seen them in awhile, but the last time I drove past their house, maybe a year or so ago, they had an '03-07 style Corolla. That might not have been an indication of the S-series being a bad car, though. As I recall, the replacement Ion was a bit of a disappointment, and turned off a lot of Saturn owners, so it could've just been that it was time for a new car, they didn't like the Ion, still felt burned by Honda over that Civic, so they tried a Corolla. How's that Aura been holding up for you? I liked 'em when they first came out, and would still consider one if I was in the market for a car.
|
|
|
It is amazing how most of the models drop in value 3 years down the road. Even Caddy's are cheap in the used market. After the bankruptcy and Obama giving the UAW a majority of the company over bonded share holders, I will drive a Kia or Hyundai before a GM. Also how the UAW leadership basically killed Saturn (a quality car line for years). |
|
|
Replying to: m4d_cow (Nov 11, 2009 3:04 am)
|
|
|
Dont forget toyota/lexus nissan/infiniti ford/lincoln/mercury nissan/suzuki Is there a carmaker that doesnt clone? I dont mean one offs....100k or more in sales....who doesnt share parts etc? GM took it to its lowest (highest?) level.......cloning everything. Caddilac Cimarron anyone??????? |
|
|
Replying to: cooterbfd (Nov 11, 2009 9:07 am) I think GM has usually been pretty good at differentiating their midsized and larger cars. It's smaller cars where they got bad with quickie badge jobs. You can probably blame that on Buick, Olds, and Pontiac dealerships crying for smaller cars in the 1970's. I think GM's first quickie badge-engineering job was the 1971 Pontiac Ventura II...a thinly disguised Nova. It used the same dashboard as a Nova, but Pontiac changed around some of the easy-swap items, like seat patterns, door panels, etc. And outside, the taillights and front-end. Chevy, Pontiac, Olds, and Buick all had strong sellers in the midsized and full-sized ranks, so it probably made more sense to invest the money to make more drastic changes among them. But nobody really bought Buick Apollos or Oldsmobile Omegas...if they wanted a compact they went with a Chevy Nova or, to a lesser degree, a Pontiac Ventura. Those compacts were probably put in the Buick and Olds dealerships with the sole purpose of upselling buyers into a Century, Cutlass, etc. I think where GM ran into problems in later years though, is that they'd make four different versions of the same basic car. And they'd all be different enough to suit a wide variety of tastes, but it's not like one was a definite step up from the other. For instance, a Lexus ES, while based on the Camry, is still a definite step up. However, when GM had the Impala, Grand Prix, Intrigue, and Century/Regal, there was just too much overlap. Now GM did a good job, IMO, of making the cars all look different. Much better than Ford did with the Taurus/Sable, for instance, or Mopar with the Status/Sebring sedans. I guess you could argue the Intrepid/Concorde as well, although here I DO see a difference...but maybe I just notice it because I have an Intrepid! But with Toyota, the Camry tops out in price about where the ES starts, so there's really not too much overlap. With GM, all four cars were in the same basic price point. They are doing a better job nowadays, though. For instance, the LaCrosse is a definite step up from the likes of the Malibu/Aura. And it's still the cheaper cars where the cloning is too obvious, like the Pontiac G3/G5. I think the Traverse/Acadia/Outlook/Enclave sort of fell back into that trap of offering four different vehicles in the same price range, though. Not necessarily badge-engineered, but still four vehicles doing essentially the job of one. Although at least here, the Enclave seems a definite step above the others. |
|
|
"In fact, from a demographic point-of-view I'm pretty well centered in the GMC Terrain's gun sights as far as target buyers go. And guess what? I could absolutely see myself buying one instead of the competition. Does that statement surprise you? Me too. It's interesting, because there's plenty of hard data to suggest GM is making progress. Market share seems to have finally leveled off, and the destructive combination of bloated inventory and incentive spending no longer drives pricing or vehicle sales." Is GM Actually Going to Pull Off a Successful Turnaround? (Karl on Cars)
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views GM News, New Models and Market Share
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
