Sign In Join 



GM News, New Models and Market Share

8270 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 5:01 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 679 of 828
1
...
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
...
828
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6776 of 8270
Re: Buick sales may rebound [lemko] by bpizzuti
Jul 02, 2009 (6:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Jul 02, 2009 5:44 am)

It blows my mind how "old people" are disdained in this country when they are revered and respected in others. Heck, those "old people" didn't get to live so long by being stupid. Heck, I'd rather be seen as a doddering old geezer driving a Buick, than a pretentious poseur valueless yuppie snob driving the latest overpriced imported ego-mobile.
 
Reinforcing the point that some people got old not by being smart but by being too mean and ornery to die.
#6777 of 8270
Re: 4x8? [lemko] by andre1969
Jul 02, 2009 (6:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Jul 02, 2009 6:18 am)

Look at it this way, anything's better than the dreaded 301!
 
Definitely true. Even there though, I think if I found an otherwise nice car that looked like it had been well-maintained that had the 301, I might be willing to take the chance. That caramel-brown '77 Grand LeMans sedan that was at the Carlisle GM show in 2007/2008 (but not this year) has a 301. Although maybe it finally blew, and that's why it wasn't at the show for 2009!
#6778 of 8270
Re: 4x8? [steve_] by buyamerican2
Jul 02, 2009 (6:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jul 01, 2009 1:05 pm)

Hey Steve, Fisher Body was like a division of GM. They designed assembled the bodies. Your 52 Buick frame and body were nothing like a Chevy or Cadillac. I own a '52 Chieftain and a '52 Caddy and the frames and body work are not the same at all. The only thing common are some nuts and bolts. The Cadillac is larger, more "heavy duty" and has a more sophisticated front suspension. That's what you got for the premium $$$.
#6779 of 8270
Re: 4x8? [andre1969] by fezo
Jul 02, 2009 (6:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Jul 02, 2009 6:11 am)

Yeah, if I had it to do over again, knowing what I know now, I might have bought that '79 Bonneville.
 
Too bad you didn't. You really need another car.
#6780 of 8270
Re: 4x8? [buyamerican2] by andre1969
Jul 02, 2009 (6:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: buyamerican2 (Jul 02, 2009 6:29 am)

I've always wondered how much more beefy the C-body from that era was, compared to the B-body? You could definitely see the difference between an A-body (Chevy/Pontiac) and B-body (Olds, smaller Buicks), as the B-body wasn't much bigger, but was a LOT heavier. But then the C-body, didn't seem that much heavier considering the size.
 
In 1957-58, I think Olds might actually have been the best-built of the GM cars. While Buick and Cadillac went to that wasp-waisted "X-frame" in '57, and Chevy/Pontiac joined for 1958, Olds sort of doubled up, using an X-frame, but with perimeter rails as well. Sort of an X within a box.
 
For 1959-64, I think Chevy/Buick went with an X-frame, while Pontiac/Olds went with a perimeter frame. I forget now what Cadillac did.
#6781 of 8270
Re: 4x8? [fezo] by andre1969
Jul 02, 2009 (6:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Jul 02, 2009 6:39 am)

Too bad you didn't. You really need another car.
 
Lessee, that was the summer of 1999. At that time, I had an '89 Gran Fury ex copcar as my daily driver, my grandmother's '85 LeSabre as a spare car, the DeSoto, the Catalina and a '67 Chrysler Newport hardtop coupe. So yeah, a '79 Bonneville would have fit in well.
 
I probably could have gotten it for a few hundred bucks. The owner was actually planning on donating it to a charity! He also had a 1988 or so Fiero GT, and a Chrysler 300M. Old guy, well into his 60's, but I think he had decent taste in cars.
#6782 of 8270
Re: 4x8? [buyamerican2] by gagrice
Jul 02, 2009 (6:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: buyamerican2 (Jul 02, 2009 6:29 am)

I had a 1947 Pontiac and a 1948 Cadillac. They were night and day difference. Though both good vehicles. My feeling is GM lost it in the middle 1960s. By 1964 Dodge was building tougher trucks. By the 1970s GM was building mostly dogs. They got back into the truck business with the 1988 PU trucks. Lost it again in 1999. And have not done much since.
#6783 of 8270
Re: 4x8? [bpizzuti] by cooterbfd
Jul 02, 2009 (7:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: bpizzuti (Jul 02, 2009 4:36 am)

"......But for a company with a bad rep, or one that needs to be built up, the perception is that they're using the cheap-brand components in the expensive brands...and it becomes a Malibu drivetrain in the CTS, rather than vice versa. See what I'm getting at?"
 
Absolutely, I do. Fair or not, it IS something GM has to work hard to overcome. Even though the original Lexus ES was a gussied up Camry, the perception is that the Camry was a toned down Lexus. Fortunately, all the car rags seem to agree that the 3.6L is a world class engine. Hopefully, the cars they get put in will someday soon be seen as world class, and it won't matter that they run the same engine, just like it doesn't matter for Chrysler, Ford, Toyota, Nissan, et al.
#6784 of 8270
Re: Buick sales may rebound [lemko] by cooterbfd
Jul 02, 2009 (7:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Jul 02, 2009 5:35 am)

"..... I'd be thundering through the streets in my massive 1958 Buick Limitied in an automotive expression of a huge upright middle finger to all those west coasters' import-worshipping elitism."
 
One caveat; we have to exchange the Limited's 364 Nailhead for a 425 w/ the 6x2bbl setup for more power and effect. Otherwise, the ultra rare Stage III 455 will do.
#6785 of 8270
Re: 4x8? [buyamerican2] by steve_ HOST
Jul 02, 2009 (8:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: buyamerican2 (Jul 02, 2009 6:29 am)

Your 52 Buick frame and body were nothing like a Chevy or Cadillac.
 
Sure, but impressionable kids like me noticed the Fisher logo on the sills in our Buick, and then I'd see the same logo in friends' Chevys. They should have used different badges there too.
 
It made me wonder "why bother" getting a Caddy or Buick if "parts are parts."
 
My father went from the '53 Buick to a Valiant to a Falcon. As much as he loved his Buick, I think it was the only one he drove. He was 36 when he got it and drove it for around 14 years, so he got his money's worth out of it.

Messages Page 679 of 828
1
...
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
...
828
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement