Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views GM News, New Models and Market Share
8475 messages, Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 11:49 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: lemko (Jun 22, 2009 5:51 am) |
|
|
an email from local chevy dealer had a photo of it. All new inside and out. 2.2 N/A and 2.0 T engines retained at 160 and 260 HP. ESC added to base. All new interior looks to be a cross between new Malibu and it's Honda/Mazda competitors. I expect to see them at dealers on July 15th. The Malibu suits me fine for a next new car. Now that I commute less than 15 miles, 2.5L is small enough with $3 gas. I split my driving into 3 GM V6 and V8 cars and trucks and gas is $3.60-$4.85 a day ($2.72/g). The switch to a 4 cyl will get that under $3 a day. 32 mpg would get me to $2.50 a day. Is it going to be the 2010 Cobalt or Cruze?
|
|
|
|
|
The G8 V8 gets mileage like a Hummer, so it's not staying. Some forget that CAFE is going to 35mpg+. [And who is willing to pay big gas taxes, instead?] Camaros and Vettes get better mileage and GM should preserve them instead. Also, the G8 fans are only buying them after huge discounts, hardly a good business model. The fans want to see v8 cars, but then don't buy. Or wait 10 years. Dream cars have to make $$ not just entertain fans at auto shows. Blame Obama? Well, the GOP would have let all of GM die, so the G8 would still have been canned. [And Holden would be SOL] |
|
|
Replying to: dave8697 (Jun 22, 2009 7:57 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dieselone (Jun 22, 2009 10:03 am)
|
|
|
Buick's quality ranking did exactly what I thought it would once the old technology lackluster cars weren't around to boost the ratings. Many on here bragged about how Buick was up there with Lexus. No more. Buick is below average in the latest IQS study. Even below BMW, VW, Susuki, Kia, Hyundai and many others. Anyway, all is not bad, Cadillac did great coming in 3rd. Below Lexus and Porche.
|
|
|
Replying to: dieselone (Jun 22, 2009 1:55 pm) Sadly though, it's not true. The 3 offerings right now are the Enclave, Lacrosse, and Lucerne. 2 of those (the cars) aren't new technology - they ride on 10-12 yr old platforms. |
|
|
Malibu outsells Accord to fleets. Pontiac V8's are missing a highway gear. Buick didn't reinvent the platform anually. Porshe has better iq than Buick shame on everyone not driving a 35 mpg car. What was the Lacrosse predecessor in '97 as an all new platform?
|
|
GM has announced it will offer a 2.4L engine in the 2010 LaCrosse with direct injection and 182hp, the first 4-cylinder Buick since the SkyLark. A smart and bold move. Welcome to the new GM.
|
|
|
Replying to: torque_r (Jun 22, 2009 7:35 pm) 182HP, no turbo... Something like 140lb-ft torque. Mated to a stupidly tall gear ratio automatic that in normal driving only develops maybe 2/3 of that maximum HP and torque... All in a 3600 pound brick...  Fail.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views GM News, New Models and Market Share
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
